Newsletter Subject

This New Oil Tech Still Makes Money Even If Oil Crashes

From

investingchannel.com

Email Address

insidermonkey@em.investingchannel.com

Sent On

Fri, Jun 9, 2017 01:09 PM

Email Preheader Text

This New Oil Tech Still Makes Money Even If Oil Crashes With oil price projections fluctuating among

This New Oil Tech Still Makes Money Even If Oil Crashes With oil price projections fluctuating among the experts, the only way oil producers can ensure their survival is to drive down their cost of production. Those that produce the cheapest, will survive the longest. No longer is quantity over quality acceptable, as the majors are backing away from world’s [most expensive sources of oil in the world.]( Meanwhile global supply has resumed strong growth, outpacing the increase in demand despite production cuts made by Opec and 11 non-Opec countries last year. The Harvard University professor who predicted oil’s 2014-16 downturn in 2012, is predicting another “[substantial fall](” unless oil demand growth rebounds to record levels in 2017. What that means is that the oil most expensive to produce, will be quickly phased out. Many of the world’s largest oil reserves currently go unproduced, because formation challenges make wells too complicated, and too expensive to produce. Petroteq Energy Inc. ([TSX.V: PQE]() ([OTCQX: PQEFF)]( is a small-cap oil and gas exploration and production company with an edge that even most majors can’t compete with. They can still make a profit at $25 per barrel. Not many companies could still survive if the price of oil dropped to less than half from where it is now. But armed with a new oil tech designed to unlock production from previously “inaccessible” oil reserves, and a sizeable position on a field with over 160 million barrels of oil in place [1], Petroteq could. Here’s how: #1 Shallow Depths Equal Shallow Costs The current average cost of drilling a well in the Permian Basin is between [$5 million and $9.33 million](. But that accounts for long horizontal lengths, which currently amount to a cost of [$970,000 per 1,000 ft](. Petroteq is the largest shareholder and a strategic partner of Accord GR Energy, Inc., that controls a 7000-acre lease in Edwards County, Texas, with potentially over 160 MM barrels of oil in the ground. It’s targets are in the underdeveloped Wardlaw Field. This is an extra-shallow heavy oil field. The average well depth of the top zone, the A-Zone, is at an extremely shallow depth, between 236 to 260 ft. Armed with a pair of innovative technologies that were proven to work last February, Petroteq and Accord’s strategy does not require lateral drilling. Instead, the company will be drilling a series of conventional vertical wells, that are expected to cost less than most MSRP prices on a new vehicle: approximately $25,000 per hole. This lower threshold for each hole further drastically reduces the company’s dry-hole risk, while affording Petroteq the ability to plan drilling programs of upwards of 40-wells per phase. The Wardlaw Field, which to-date has had over 134 production wells drilled since discovery, prior to Petroteq’s Accord was producing up to 20 bpd, which calculates into gallons per day on the per well basis. In over 70 years since the first oil was produced in the region, a little over than 117,000 bbls have come out of the Wardlaw. The reasoning, is that though there is a massive amount of oil in place, the field has no water, gas, or other drive mechanism. The formation’s pressure is abnormally low. Thus all of the other wells to-date have had a history of producing oil at extremely low production rates. The result is an oil field with swaths of land available for extremely low prices, waiting for a figurative Prince Charming to awake it from its slumber. Petroteq and its operational and technological innovation partners Accord and Galex Energy, took on the challenge with their pilot project last year, and proved that they’re the ones who will finally get it right. #2 Riding the Wave Through Accord, Petroteq has the rights to a proprietary technology called SWEPT, developed by Galex Energy Corp. SWEPT uses impulse waves to unlock the hydrocarbons the industry finds toughest to recover. It does so by loosening up rock filtration and fluid properties, which allow the fluids to flow more freely. In development for more than a decade, SWEPT is designed to be universally applicable to oil fields all over the world, and to resolve all types of complications oil producers may face. SWEPT handles: - Lack of pressure - High viscosity - Poor rock properties - High water content, low oil saturation And while SWEPT resolves challenges and/or improves less than desirable conditions, it has one major component that makes it even more appealing to other major players in the industry. It’s application is cheap. SWEPT doesn’t require expensive tools to be run down hole. Instead, it is run from the wellhead, which is calibrated specifically for the unique conditions of the target field. Wave treatments from the SWEPT wellhead cause changes to occur in the oil containing rock, as well as the oil contained in the rocks. These changes impact all physical levels of the system from the smallest molecular and micro-capillary to the macro level. The innovators of SWEPT [successfully proved the technology works last year on the Wardlaw Field.]( To remove any doubt, they carried out the tests on the most depleted section of the field. They chose an area where the “easy” oil had already been extracted, and only the most difficult oil trapped in the rocks’ “matrixes” remained. In essence, they chose to make the impossible possible, and did so with flying colors. This was an important test. Because this is exactly the type of trapped oil that makes up 90% of the Wardlaw Field’s reserves. SWEPT’s main objective is to trigger the field to release its oil with natural energy, and enhance oil recovery by more than 70% to produce at much higher rates. The technology is low-cost, easy-to-control, and universal. It involves light-weight equipment at the well-head, and can be fine-tuned and adjusted to the specifics of each field’s unique characteristics. It’s already shown itself to be incredible effective. But it’s a total powerhouse for production when combined with… #3 State of Transition The S-BRPT Process is the other proprietary technology (developed by partner Galex) will be used to maximize value on the Wardlaw Field. When combined with SWEPT, the S-BRPT will draw interest from majors looking to reduce their per-barrel production cost. While wells will only cost $25,000 to drill, it will only cost the company $40,000 to per well to complete and tie-in for production. That’s a total per-producing-well cost of $65,000. Or less than [one year’s worth of post-secondary at over 50 US colleges](. Adapted from a technology that began its use in the 1930s through to the 1980s, the S-BRPT method was developed to produce oil from vast reserves of extra-heavy oil, at extra-shallow depths. Unlike other methods that can be both financially and environmentally costly, the S-BRPT process is very low on energy and water consumption, and produces very low greenhouse gas emissions. The process involves altering the physical state of the hydrocarbons into a vapor/gaseous form underground, only to return it to a liquid state at the surface. This allows the hydrocarbons to flow more freely to the collection point at the wellhead. The carefully tailored for Wardlaw combination of both S-BRPT and SWEPT resulted in the new process S-BTF that will provide a 1500% increase in production on the testing, and proved well rates potential at 10 barrels per day or greater. It was obvious to all involved, that the combination of the two methods greatly improved the feasibility of the entire field. To the Accord/Petroteq team, it became clear… They’re ready to ramp up. BONUS #4 Back of Napkin Economics Petroteq’s Accord already has 7,000 acres in the Wardlaw, but given their unique ability to produce from it, the company will have sparse competition when it comes time to acquire more land for wells. But the key to their business model that separates Petroteq from majority of their oil patch counterparts is how low the price of oil can go before their program stops being economic. Even in a worst-case scenario, a well produces 10 barrels per day for a year. That’s 3,650 barrels of oil. That well will have cost $65,000 to drill, complete, and tie in. For the well to break even, oil could be as low as just under $16.50. At even $25 a barrel, the well remains economic and commercially viable. As we know, oil is currently hovering around $48 per barrel. And even heavy oil is getting near-par pricing to Texas sweet crude, thanks to a downturn in supply coming from Venezuela. Through Accord, Petroteq has found a way to make a profit at drastically low oil prices. They have the technology to not only improve their chances on each hole they drill, but to lure the interest of majors looking for ways to maximize their own production. The company has a field wide open and ready to be drilled, with many, many wells, to add up to a very profitable portfolio of extra-shallow, heavy oil wells. As word gets out of the effectiveness of SWEPT and S-BPRT, the majors will certainly take notice. If the price of oil does drop considerably, there will be plenty of juniors that aren’t Petroteq available for majors such as Murphy Oil [NYSE: MUR], ConocoPhillips [NYSE: COP], or Chevron [NYSE: CVX] to possibly snap them up. Another possibility would be for one of the largest major oilfield service providers such as Baker Hughes [NYSE: BHI], Schlumberger [NYSE: SLB] or Halliburton [NYSE: HAL] to outright buy out Petroteq and its subsidiary Accord’s interest in Galex’s technologies, and roll out the methods across North America and beyond. In the meantime, even with an expected price drop on the horizon, Petroteq has access to the technology and oil in place to ride the wave to profitability. G. Joel Chury -- [1] - Castaneda, F. & Paddock, R.E., 1984. Estimation of Original Oil-In-Place Glenrose Formation Wardlaw Field, Edwards Co., TX., Houston, TX: J.R. Butler and Company. Forward-Looking Statements This article [news release] contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Forward-looking statements can be identified by words such as “anticipates”, “intends”, “plans”, “believes”, “seeks”, “estimates”, “expects”, “guidance”, “suggests” and similar references to future periods. These statements include, but are not limited to, statements about future plans, expectations and objectives for the operations conducted by Accord GR Energy, Inc., an affiliate of Petroteq, and Galex Energy, the owner of the SWEPT technology and the S-BRPT technology and licensor of the technologies to Accord, and includes oil and gas lease positions, drilling plans, capital plans, estimated drilling, completion and tie-in costs for wells, well testing and production performance, pilot operations and studies, technology applications and performance, oil prices, and well payouts and profitability. While forward-looking statements are based on data, assumptions and analyses that Petroteq believes are reasonable under the circumstances, whether actual results, performance or developments will meet the company’s expectations and predictions depend on a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause the actual results, performance and financial condition of Petroteq and Accord, its affiliate, to differ materially from Petroteq’s expectations. As “Risk Factors” that could affect Accord’s operations, and the business of Petroteq, the operations conducted by Accord using the SWEPT technology and the S-BRPT technology (collectively, the “Technologies”) in the Wardlaw Field in southwest Texas are preliminary and obtained through pilot testing and the drilling and testing of three new wells in the Field. There can be no guarantee as to the number of additional wells that can be or will be drilled by Accord in the Wardlaw Field, that existing or new leases can be obtained by Accord or held by production, or that the initial results obtained by Accord – results that are dependent on the successful application and performance of the Technologies, drilling, completion and tie-in costs, and well production performance – will be achieved with additional wells that may be drilled by Accord in the Field. In addition, there can be no guarantee that Accord will be able to secure oil and gas leases in other fields and prospective areas or that it will be able, either from an operational or financial standpoint, to drill additional wells on any such new leases or that the application of the Technologies to any such wells, associated drilling and completion costs, and production that may be achieved from such wells will yield results that are substantially similar to (or better than) the initial results achieved by Accord in the Wardlaw Field in southwest Texas. Any forward-looking statements made by the author in this article, to the extent based on information provided by Petroteq, speaks only as of the date on which such statements are made through publication of this article. Factors or events that could cause the actual results or events to differ may emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for Petroteq to predict all of them. Neither the author of this article – nor Petroteq – undertake any obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information or events, future developments or otherwise, except as may be required by law. Cautionary Note to Investors The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) permits oil and gas companies, in their filings with the SEC, to disclose only proved, probable and possible reserves that meet the SEC’s definitions for such terms. The author of this article – based on information provided by Petroteq or Accord, its affiliate, may use certain terms in this article such as “reserves”, “recoverable reserves”, “estimated reserves” and other similar terms that SEC rules and guidelines strictly prohibit Petroteq from using or including in filings with the SEC. Use of such terms – though believed to be reasonable in nature – do not take into account the certainty, timing or cost of resource recovery, which is contingent on exploration, drilling and production success, the successful application of the Technologies and technological improvements, both in drilling and in production, commerciality, and economic feasibility and efficiencies and other factors, and are therefore not indicative of expected future resource recovery and should not be relied upon. Investors are urged to consider carefully any disclosures that may be made from time to time in Petroteq’s Annual Report filed on Form ____ with the ________________, available from Petroteq at www._______ or by writing Petroteq at : _________________________________ (Attn: Corporate Secretary). You can also obtain this Report from the SEC by calling 1-800-SEC-0330 or from the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Information This article contains certain forward-looking information and forward-looking statements as defined in applicable securities laws (collectively referred to herein as “forward-looking statements”). These statements relate to future events or the future performance of Petroteq or Accord GR Energy, Inc., its affiliate. All statements other than statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements. Often, but not always, forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as “plans”, “expects”, “is expected”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “estimates”, “continues”, “forecasts”, “projects”, “predicts”, “intends”, “anticipates” or “believes”, or variations of, or the negatives of, such words and phrases, or state that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “should”, “might” or “will” be taken, occur or be achieved. Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated in such forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements in this article speak only as of the date of its publication or as of the date specified in such statement. Specifically, this article includes, but is not limited to, forward-looking statements regarding: management’s outlook regarding future trends; sensitivity analysis on financial instruments, which may vary from amounts disclosed; prices and price volatility for oil and gas; and general business and economic conditions. Inherent in forward-looking statements are risks, uncertainties and other factors beyond Petroteq’s ability to predict or control. These risks, uncertainties and other factors include, but are not limited to, oil and gas reserves, price volatility, changes in debt and equity markets, timing and availability of external financing on acceptable terms, the uncertainties involved in interpreting geological data and confirming title to properties, the possibility that future exploration results or the validation of technology will not be consistent with the Company's expectations, increases in costs, environmental compliance and changes in environmental and other local legislation and regulation, interest rate and exchange rate fluctuations, changes in economic and political conditions and other risks involved in the oil and gas industry, as well as those risk factors listed in the “Risk Factors” section below. Readers are cautioned that the foregoing list of factors is not exhaustive of the factors that may affect the forward-looking statements. Actual results and developments are likely to differ, and may differ materially, from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements contained in this article. Such statements are based on a number of assumptions that may prove to be incorrect, including, but not limited to, assumptions about the following: the availability of financing for Petroteq’s (and Accord GR Energy’s) exploration and development activities; operating and exploration costs; Petroteq’s ability to retain and attract skilled staff; timing of the receipt of regulatory and governmental approvals for exploration and production projects and other operations; market competition; and general business and economic conditions. Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the Company's actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any of its future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements herein are qualified by this cautionary statement. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. The Company undertakes no obligation to update publicly or otherwise revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information or future events or otherwise, except as may be required by law. If the Company does update one or more forward-looking statements, no inference should be drawn that it will make additional updates with respect to those or other forward-looking statements, unless required by law.

EDM Keywords (292)

zone year www worth world words wells wellhead well website ways way wave wardlaw venezuela variations validation using used use urged upwards unlock universal uncertainties types type trigger transition time tie though therefore tests testing terms technology technologies targets take system swept swaths survive survival surface strategy statements state specifics series securities sec run roll rocks risks rights ride return retain result respect resolve required report remove release regulatory region reduce recover receipt reasoning reasonable ready readers ramp quantity qualified publication provide proven proved properties profitability profit production producing produces produced produce price pressure preliminary predict potentially possible possibility plenty place phrases petroteq performance pair owner operations operational opec ones one oil occur obvious obtained obligation objectives number neither negatives nature might methods meet means meaning may maximize many makes make majors majority made lure low loosening longest longer little limited likely licensor less law land key juniors involved investors interest innovators inference industry indicative increase including improve implied identified hydrocarbons hole history herein held half guarantee ground greater go given gas galex freely found formation form following fluids flow financing financially filings fields field feasibility factors extracted expressed exploration experts expensive expected expectations existing exhaustive exactly events even essence environmental ensure energy efficiencies effectiveness edge economic drive drilling drilled drill drawn downturn doubt disclosures disclose differ developments development developed designed dependent definitions defined debt date costs cost controls control contingent consistent complicated complete compete company come combined combination chose cheapest changes chances challenge cautioned carried calculates business btf brpt bprt beyond better believes began based barrel awake available availability author assumptions article armed area application appealing anticipated analyses already allows allow affiliate adjusted addition add acquire achievements achieved accounts account accord access able ability 90 70 236 2017 2012 1980s 1933 1930s

Marketing emails from investingchannel.com

View More
Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

04/12/2024

Sent On

04/12/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.