Newsletter Subject

ETFs You Should Buy Right Now

From

investingchannel.com

Email Address

TheJuice@news.investingchannel.com

Sent On

Fri, Jul 22, 2022 09:01 PM

Email Preheader Text

BROUGHT TO YOU BY: Proprietary Data Insights Top Sector-Specific ETF Searches This Month Rank Name S

[View in browser]( BROUGHT TO YOU BY: Proprietary Data Insights Top Sector-Specific ETF Searches This Month Rank Name Searches #1 SPDR S&P Biotech ETF 417 #2 Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund 333 #3 VanEck Vectors Gold Miners ETF 186 #4 iShares PHLX Semiconductor ETF 168 #5 U.S. Global Jets ETF 162 #ad [3 Immediate Threats to Your Wealth]( A Primer On How To Spot ETFs You Should Avoid As we continue [our series on ETFs]( (go here for the most recent one and links to the entire series), The Juice looks more closely at ETFs that organize around a sector or theme. It’s important to spot and understand the difference. To help illustrate the difference, let’s start with an ETF that could very well be worth your time - the U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS). You Know Exactly What You’re Getting With JETS First good sign. This ETF does not track the performance of the New York Jets. Rather, it gives you exposure to the global airline industry by attempting to mirror the movement of the U.S. Global Jets Index (JETSX). Whether you’re bullish or bearish the global airline industry is up to you. But if you are bullish, it might make sense to go long JETS. Because it’s super-focused. And, within that focus, nicely diversified. However, to achieve this diversification management follows a pretty strict playbook. Because, remember, it’s mimicking an established index. If you look at the holdings of JETS and the stocks that compose JETSX, they’re pretty much the same in name and position size. Source: [U.S. Global ETFs]( There you have the top five holdings in the JETS ETF. Here you have the top five names in the JETSX index. Source: [U.S. Global Indices]( Identical. It’s when terms are broad and poorly defined. When fund managers have too much subjective leeway over what to own. Over which companies actually fit their ETF’s theme. Or when the theme itself makes for a murky and unclear, if not downright bad investment opportunity. This is when you can run into problems, as The Juice will show, if you’d be kind enough to scroll with us. [Brought to you by Weiss Ratings]( [3 Immediate Threats to Your Wealth]( Three terrifying forces are converging to threaten your wealth. Force #1: The destruction of decent INTEREST you earn on your savings. Force #2: The rapid erosion of your PRINCIPAL through inflation and Force #3: The gut punch to your PORTFOLIO in the crashing stock market. I've prepared solutions to all these problems and more in my 7-step plan for 2022. [Click here for my 7-step plan for 2022]( ETF Investing ETFs You Should Buy Right Now Key Takeaways: - Some ETFs get too lofty. Others too specific, yet simultaneously vague. - ARKK and YALL highlight what we mean and illustrate why you should stay away from these types of ETFs. - It’s almost always better to go with straightforward and simple ETFs. Whereas JETS provides specific, though diversified exposure to a focused section of the stock market, other ETFs don’t just lack focus, they fall into the category of ETFs you probably should avoid. For example, last week The Juice briefly mentioned Cathie Wood’s ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK) in [our installment on making investing simple]( with ETFs: The fund focuses on tech stocks with the potential for “disruptive innovation”, which means companies with products and services with the potential to “change the way the world works.” That’s some lofty stuff! ARK’s performance: not so lofty. It’s down more than 60% over the last year. In this case, not only does the manager have to stock pick, but they do so somewhat arbitrarily. They have to define something that’s incredibly subjective. A quick look at how ARK describes itself tells you everything you need to know: Source: [ARK Funds]( That’s all over the place. And ARKK’s horrible performance reflects this lack of focus. It’s not to say you can never buy a fund where you put faith in a manager’s stock picks. Sometimes you can win. However, it adds another layer to your decision-making process. When you see a manager stock picking around a poorly-defined theme, consider this a reason to hesitate. You have to have considerable faith in the person, not just conviction in whatever broad idea they’re floating. Y’all Come Back Now, Ya Hear! Same probably applies to an ETF that has sent papers to the SEC. They want the ticker YALL. They want to be called the All-American ETF. And here’s how they [detail]( how they’ll pick stocks: The Sub-Adviser then screens out companies that, in the Sub-Adviser’s assessment, have emphasized political activism and social agendas at the expense of maximizing shareholder returns in the Sub-Adviser’s assessment. For example, the Sub-Adviser will generally exclude companies that make public statements about a then-current political hot button item unrelated to their business (e.g., companies that issue press releases in response to U.S. Supreme Court rulings). A side of politics with your investing? Probably not a good idea. The Bottom Line: Today’s installment ultimately comes back to a basic theme - keep it simple. If you were going to pick your first two ETFs ever today, it probably makes sense to [go as straightforward as possible]( with products that track established, broad stock market indices. So the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) or Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ). From there, you take it into sectors you want to own, via ETFs that methodically adhere to the names in, again, established indices. This might mean JETS or something else entirely. It’s just that when you’re taking the risk of going sector-specific, you don’t need to add the quality of your fund manager’s stock picking skills to your list of concerns. Any four of the names ahead of JETS on today’s Trackstar list of ETFs investors search for most make more sense than going rogue on an unfocused fund. That is, of course, if you like the sectors they run in. News & Insights Freshly Squeezed - [10 Best Value ETFs To Invest In]( - [Bite Into This $155B Money Pie (Ad)]( - [3 Consumer Discretionary Stocks Analysts Love]( - [‘Big Short’ Investor Michael Burry Says Nancy Pelosi’s Chip Stock Buy Should Be Illegal]( [We want to hear from you! Let us know your thoughts by clicking here]( # [submit to reddit]( [submit to reddit]( [submit to reddit]( [submit to reddit]( To ensure delivery of all emails, [allow us on your list](. Update your email preferences or unsubscribe [here](. View our privacy policy [here](. Copyright ©2022 InvestingChannel. All rights reserved. 1325 Avenue of the Americas, Floor 27 & 28 New York, New York 10019 Disclaimer: This is not investment advice. This InvestingChannel, Inc. newsletter is for information purposes only and opinion-based. Futures, forex, stock, and options trading are not appropriate for all investors. There is a substantial risk of loss associated with trading these markets. Losses can and will occur. No system or methodology has ever been developed that can ensure returns or against losses. No representation or implication is being made that using any of these methodologies or systems will generate returns or ensure against losses. Investors should be cautious about any and all investments and are advised to conduct their own due diligence prior to making any investment decisions. [Link](

Marketing emails from investingchannel.com

View More
Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

04/12/2024

Sent On

04/12/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.