Newsletter Subject

Not All Rich People Are Voting For Donald Trump

From

investingchannel.com

Email Address

TheJuice@news.investingchannel.com

Sent On

Tue, Sep 10, 2024 06:30 PM

Email Preheader Text

There?s a coalition of wealthy CEOs and VCs supporting Kamala Harris Proprietary Data Insights Top

There’s a coalition of wealthy CEOs and VCs supporting Kamala Harris [View in browser]( [The Juice Logo] BROUGHT TO YOU BY: [Logo]( Proprietary Data Insights Top Mid-Cap Internet Content & Information Stock Searches Rank Ticker Name Searches #1 [UPWK]( UpWork 4,724 #2 [BILI]( Bilibili 3,538 #3 [CARG]( CarGurus 2,082 #4 [MOMO]( Hello Group 1,948 #5 [YELP]( Yelp 1,921 #ad [Unlock America's Uranium Potential]( Brought to you by [Behind the Markets]( [Three Overlooked AI Stocks Set to Soar]( [ Behind the Markets - Three Overlooked AI Stocks Set to Soar]( Your Second Chance to Profit from AI If you missed out on Nvidia, don't worry. A 244-year-old pattern is about to trigger a $25.6 trillion AI surge... …That could send three overlooked stocks soaring 1,000%+ [Get my new research on all three plays right now.]( Not All Rich People Are Voting For Donald Trump In July, The Juice told you about [the movement of ultra rich people, including Elon Musk](, getting behind Donald Trump’s candidacy for president: Of course, this support includes Elon Musk’s $45 million-a-month pledge to Trump’s campaign. (But) it’s not just Musk. Trump’s tech, VC and otherwise ultra-wealthy backers also include Marc Andreessen and Ben Horowitz, Sequoia’s Doug Leone, crypto billionaires Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss and Palantir Technologies (PLTR) co-founder Joe Lonsdale. And we gave our take on the basis behind their support: No doubt, Musk and the upper echelon of the Silicon Valley crowd have amassed fortunes. Fortunes they want to protect. So, when you see this support from these people, realize it’s not populist support. It’s not even about business. It’s about power. And It’s personal. It’s about their personal finance that, even with tight regulation and new taxes, is far more secure than that of the average and even relatively well-off American. Some of the 1% tend to be most concerned with one thing and one thing only: The condition of their pocketbooks. While we’re not making a judgment on a vote for Trump (or anybody else for that matter), we are saying that it’s kind of funny to see people whose money could literally last them dozens of lifetimes — even amid fast and loose spending — vote out of personal economic concern. That’s all. All of that said— As The Juice continues to sprinkle politics into our newsletter schedule between now and the election and beyond — (who’s watching the debate tonight!?) — we like to look at what’s happening around both candidates. So we thought it would be interesting to see who among the filthy (and not-so-filthy, but still) rich are actively advocating for Kamala Harris. We also thought it would be interesting to look at some of the names and, for a few, illustrate at least one component of their wealth — stock options. First, there’s VC (venture capitalists) for Kamala. Their [pitch](: We spend our days looking for, investing in and supporting entrepreneurs who are building the future. We are pro-business, pro-American dream, pro-entrepreneurship, and pro-technological progress. We also believe in democracy as the backbone of our nation. We believe that strong, trustworthy institutions are a feature, not a bug, and that our industry - and every other industry - would collapse without them. That is what’s at stake in this election. Everything else, we can solve through constructive dialogue with political leaders and institutions willing to talk to us. As we write this, 830 VCs have signed on. Including John O’Farrell, a general partner at Andreessen Horowitz, who breaks with Marc Andreessen, who has put his weight behind Trump. Maybe more interesting is the recent letter put out by a bunch of current and former big name CEOs of, primarily, tech, media and consumer companies who are supporting Harris. They include: former PepsiCo CEO Indra Nooyi, Barry Diller, chairman of IAC and former Paramount and Fox Inc. CEO, former Merck CEO Ken Frazier, Logan Green former CEO of Lyft, former GoDaddy CEO Blake Irving, former Ford CEO Alan Mulally, former Starbucks CEO Laxman Narasimhan and Dan Schulman, former CEO of PayPal; a handful of hedge fund and private wealth cats; and present-day CEOs, such as Aaron Levie of Box (BOX), Jeremy Stoppelman of Yelp (YELP) and Michael Lynton, chairman of Snap (SNAP). Let’s look at the last three. Most of us probably never heard of these dudes prior to this. But they’re still doing pretty well financially, thanks, in part, to company stock options. Consider Levie of Box. His company’s stock is up about 25% YTD. Levie isn’t Jeff Bezos or Musk, but we’re not sneezing at the $1.349 million in stock compensation proceeds he has cashed in since December, 2022. Then Stoppelman from Yelp. His stock is down 27% YTD. Dude might want to focus on something other than politics. Anyway, a crappy stock price (it’s basically flat over the last five years) hasn’t stopped Stoppelman from reaping more than $42 million in proceeds from Yelp stock since 2023. Wouldn’t it be nice if ordinary shareholders benefited as much from Yelp stock than its CEO does? Meanwhile at Snap, whose stock is down a hefty 47% this year. Lynton — poor guy — has only cashed in $738,000 from his company’s horrific stock since 2023. Stock-based compensation. It’s a wonderful thing. But it’s sort of a kick in the stomach if you’re a shareholder of a stagnant or falling stock. Maybe Kamala Harris will try to do something about the practice if she takes office? Or Trump? On both counts, we’re not holding our breath. [Stay Ahead of Election Shifts: Ensure Your Retirement Plan is on Track with Expert Help]( Choosing the right financial advisor is daunting, especially when there are thousands of financial advisors near you. We make it easy by matching you to 2 to 3 vetted advisors that meet your unique needs. Matched advisors are all registered with FINRA/SEC and provide a free initial consultation. There is no obligation to hire. [Click here to compare vetted advisors now.]([Ad] The Bottom Line: Rich people from Silicon Valley and corporate America. They won’t decide this election from their perches in places such as California or New York. Interestingly, it’s people in places such as Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan and Wisconsin who will. And The Juice has to think that these are some of the very same people who would take exception to the freakin’ CEO of Yelp barking about politics with his pen as his stock dives and his bank breaks to the tune of tens of millions of dollars. [-facebook-share]( [-twitter-share]( [-linkedin-share]( [-email-share](mailto:?body= https%3A%2F%2Finvestingchannel.com%2F%3Fp%3D628854?utm_medium=ic-nl&utm_source=121914 ) News & Insights Freshly Squeezed - [2 Housing Stocks Set To Soar In 2025]( - [Unlock Daily Stock Gems - FinPro Secrets Spilled!]( - [Use Any Weakness To Buy Nvidia’s Stock]( - [Check Out The Juice’s Favorite ETF Screener]( [News & Insights-facebook-share]( [News & Insights-twitter-share]( [News & Insights-linkedin-share]( [News & Insights-email-share](mailto:?body= https%3A%2F%2Finvestingchannel.com%2F%3Fp%3D628854?utm_medium=ic-nl&utm_source=121914 ) [We want to hear from you. Let us know your thoughts by clicking here]( [Pixel] [InvestingChannel Logo](#) Follow us on: [Facebook Logo]( [LinkedIn Logo]( [Twitter Logo]( [Instagram Logo]( To ensure delivery of all emails, [allow us on your list](. Manage your subscriptions with our [preference center](. [Unsubscribe here.]( View our privacy policy [here](. Copyright ©2024 InvestingChannel. All rights reserved. 1325 Avenue of the Americas, Floor 27 & 28 New York, New York 10019 Disclaimer: This is not investment advice. This InvestingChannel, Inc., newsletter is for information purposes only and is based on opinion. Futures, forex, stock, and options trading are not appropriate for all investors. There is a substantial risk of loss associated with trading these markets. Losses can and will occur. No system or methodology has ever been developed that can ensure returns or eliminate losses. InvestingChannel, Inc., makes no representation or implication that using any of the methodologies or systems in this newsletter will generate returns or insure against losses. Investors should be cautious about any and all investments and are advised to conduct their own due diligence prior to making any investment decisions. [Link](

Marketing emails from investingchannel.com

View More
Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

04/12/2024

Sent On

04/12/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.