Newsletter Subject

Using ETFs To Short The Magnificent Seven!?

From

investingchannel.com

Email Address

TheJuice@news.investingchannel.com

Sent On

Mon, Mar 18, 2024 06:30 PM

Email Preheader Text

That would be a bold, if not crazy move Nvidia 976,491 #2 Tesla 500,600 #3 Apple 465,394 #4 Amazon.c

That would be a bold, if not crazy move [View in browser]( [The Juice Logo] Proprietary Data Insights Top Stock Searches This Month Rank Ticker Name Searches #1 [NVDA]( Nvidia 976,491 #2 [TSLA]( Tesla 500,600 #3 [AAPL]( Apple 465,394 #4 [AMZN]( Amazon.com 306,632 #5 [MSFT]( Microsoft 255,196 #ad [Unlock Daily Stock Gems - FinPro Secrets Spilled!]( Brought to you by [The Alt]( [Diversify Your Portfolio: Beyond Stocks]( [ The Alt - Diversify Your Portfolio: Beyond Stocks]( Unleash the potential of your investments by exploring Alternative Assets! Real Estate, Private Equity, AI, NFTs… Discover new avenues and elevate your portfolio. [Sign up for The Alt for FREE today!]( Using ETFs To Short The Magnificent Seven!? Before we do anything, real quick … Holy crap! We refrain from showing you the top overall stock searches in Trackstar because they tend to be the same names. However, today seeing the usual suspects makes sense. For two reasons. In case you’re new around here, our Trackstar database measures the searches retail and professional investors make across our 100+ financial media partners, then ranks tickers based on this search interest. And, in something we don’t see all that often, Nvidia (NVDA) is nearing 1 million searches. At nearly double the interest of #2 Tesla (TSLA) and more than double that of Apple (AAPL), Amazon.com (AMZN) and Microsoft (MSFT), that’s just insane. We’ll let you know if NVDA hits a million searches. Let’s do a shot together if it does. In any event, all five of those names, along with Meta Platforms (META) and Alphabet (GOOGL), make up the fabled Magnificent Seven stocks. A formidable, market-crushing bunch. Which is why we were taken aback by the email we received from a Juice subscriber in response to a recent installment where we updated the performance of [our top stock and ETF picks for 2024](. The subscriber asked: Can you recommend an ETF that is a short position on the Magnificent Seven? Can we recommend one? Um, no. That would be crazy. However, we can answer the question of whether or not one exists. But first, some context. Basically a warning. Consider the YTD, 1-year and 5-year performance of the Magnificent Seven stocks. YTD 1-year 5-year NVDA +82.4% +241.4% +1,879.2% TSLA -34.2% -9.2% +827.3% AAPL -7.0% +11.4% +261.4% AMZN +16.3% +76.3% +97.7% MSFT +12.3% +49.0% +255.8% META +39.8 +147.5% +194.6% GOOGL +2.2% +38.9% +133.8% With the recent exception of TSLA, shorting any of these names would have likely rendered disastrous consequences, unless you’re a nimble day or swing trader. But we don’t recommend that profession or pastime for most people. With no exceptions, shorting this basket of stocks over any period beyond a moment in time would have been an unmitigated disaster. Simply put, it could have ended in insolvency. Of course, past performance doesn’t necessarily predict future results. But we’ll hold our head high if these stocks all collapse in the coming months (or even years). Because it’s just not a good idea to bet against these leaders. The trend, in this case, has been your friend. And, even if their (out)performance slows, we think the trend will continue to be your friend. So, don’t fight it. That said, an ETF that’s (kind of) a short position on the Magnificent Seven does exist. It’s called the Roundhill Daily Inverse Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGQ). As the fund company says in its literature: The Roundhill Daily Inverse Magnificent Seven ETF (the “Fund”) seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse (-1X) of the performance of the Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (the “Magnificent Seven ETF”). The return of the Fund for periods longer than a single day will be the result of its return for each day compounded over the period. The Fund presents different risks than other types of funds. The Fund is not suitable for all investors. The Fund is designed to be utilized only by knowledgeable investors who understand the potential consequences of seeking daily inverse (-1X) investment results, understand the risks associated with the use of leverage, and are willing to monitor their portfolios frequently. You could find any number of inverse or short leveraged ETFs that go up when the major indices (or some other index) goes down. If it’s a Nasdaq 100 or S&P 500 tracking ETF, it will be heavily influenced by the Magnificent Seven. That said … As we said in [a very popular Juice]( that bears repeating all of the time: A leveraged ETF uses debt or options to amplify the returns of a stock market index … The key word (associated with these types of ETFs) is daily. On any given day, TQQQ and SQQQ will generate the exact same return as QQQ, but times three. If QQQ is down 1.93%, expect TQQQ to be down roughly 5.79% and SQQQ to be up by right around the same amount. You can buy leveraged ETFs—long and short—to replicate two or three times the returns of not only indices, but even individual stocks. You can, but, in most instances, you shouldn’t. As a long-term investor, you might think if I’m bullish SPY or QQQ, why not buy an ETF that generates two or three times the performance? Because of the key word daily. The instruments used to achieve the amplifying effect function on a daily basis. They do not replicate long-term results. In fact, the typical holding period for a leveraged ETF, such as TQQQ or SQQQ, is one to two days. They’re meant for experienced traders and financial advisors (thus, their appearance in Trackstar, filtered to financial pros only), not new or long-term investors. In that Juice, we were referring to the ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) ETF and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) ETF. Fine and good. But the index doesn’t matter. Neither does looking at the performance because it’s irrelevant. If anything, these ETFs can act as short-term hedges in a portfolio. But only experienced investors should mess with this. If you want a hedge, buy a put. Even two of the big players in the space — ProShares and Direxion — warn that these are not suitable ETFs for buy-and-hold investors. Here again, even if you’re intent is to capitalize on downside, just buy a put. Inverse ETFs — or short or leveraged ETFs, however you see them classified — aren’t meant to ride the wave, in either direction, of a basket or index of stocks. To make it work, you really have to know what you’re doing and understand exactly how these ETFs function. This involved a complicated structure and a fair bit of heavy math. The Bottom Line: Put this one in the keep it simple department. While we would strongly advise against getting short — via options or by shorting the stocks themselves, especially — the Magnificent Seven, we have to ask why. Why would you want to do this when there are so many other good short opportunities and a ton of long opportunities out there? This ain’t Las Vegas. Particularly if you’re investing for retirement. Don’t look for some big home run by trying to get fancy. Invest in the market leaders consistently over the long haul. Be extra weary of betting against them. Just because they have gone up for a long time doesn’t mean they can’t continue to go up. [-facebook-share]( [-twitter-share]( [-linkedin-share]( [-email-share](mailto:?body= https%3A%2F%2Finvestingchannel.com%2F%3Fp%3D609785?utm_medium=ic-nl&utm_source=116903 ) News & Insights Freshly Squeezed - [12 Best Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stocks To Buy According to Financial Media]( - [Does This Pro Picked China Stock Make Sense?]( - [Down 34% YTD, What's Next for Tesla Stock?]( - [Check Out The Juice’s Favorite ETF Screener]( [News & Insights-facebook-share]( [News & Insights-twitter-share]( [News & Insights-linkedin-share]( [News & Insights-email-share](mailto:?body= https%3A%2F%2Finvestingchannel.com%2F%3Fp%3D609785?utm_medium=ic-nl&utm_source=116903 ) [We want to hear from you. Let us know your thoughts by clicking here]( [Pixel] [InvestingChannel Logo](#) Follow us on: [Facebook Logo]( [LinkedIn Logo]( [Twitter Logo]( [Instagram Logo]( To ensure delivery of all emails, [allow us on your list](. Manage your subscriptions with our [preference center](. [Unsubscribe here.]( View our privacy policy [here](. Copyright ©2024 InvestingChannel. All rights reserved. 1325 Avenue of the Americas, Floor 27 & 28 New York, New York 10019 Disclaimer: This is not investment advice. This InvestingChannel, Inc., newsletter is for information purposes only and is based on opinion. Futures, forex, stock, and options trading are not appropriate for all investors. There is a substantial risk of loss associated with trading these markets. Losses can and will occur. No system or methodology has ever been developed that can ensure returns or eliminate losses. InvestingChannel, Inc., makes no representation or implication that using any of the methodologies or systems in this newsletter will generate returns or insure against losses. Investors should be cautious about any and all investments and are advised to conduct their own due diligence prior to making any investment decisions. [Link](

Marketing emails from investingchannel.com

View More
Sent On

08/06/2024

Sent On

08/06/2024

Sent On

07/06/2024

Sent On

07/06/2024

Sent On

06/06/2024

Sent On

06/06/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.