Newsletter Subject

Revealed: Britain’s ‘lost’ blueprint for fighting a coronavirus outbreak – written 16 years ago

From

independent.co.uk

Email Address

customerservices@independent.co.uk

Sent On

Fri, Aug 20, 2021 04:04 PM

Email Preheader Text

The Independent needs your support Make a contribution and help fund free-thinking journalism Hello

The Independent needs your support [The Independent]( [Contribute]( Make a contribution and help fund free-thinking journalism Hello {NAME}, We all need truly independent journalism now more than ever to counter disinformation and hold the powerful to account at a time of profound change. Please consider joining our Supporter Programme by [contributing today](. You will be directly funding additional special reports and investigations from a free-thinking, award-winning newsroom you can trust. With the above in mind, we wanted to share with you some of the incredible recent work that our Supporter Programme has made possible. [Contribute]( [Revealed: Britain’s ‘lost’ blueprint for fighting a coronavirus outbreak – written 16 years ago]( [Alternate text]( The Coronavirus Files: After Sars swept across the globe, the UK drew up a plan for fighting an airborne virus arriving in Britain from China. The 2005 document was filed away in Whitehall, and apparently never used. Now uncovered, its recommendations – from limiting travel to stopping ‘super-spreader’ events – are strikingly similar to the measures belatedly brought in to fight Covid-19. Former government advisers tell [Samuel Lovett]( that this guide to fighting an epidemic could have saved tens of thousands of lives. [Contribute]( Other supporter programme articles in this series: [I'm an image]( [It could have saved lives. So how did the coronavirus response plan go missing?]( [I'm an image]( [In full: The 2005 coronavirus plan that predicted outbreak response from ‘super-spreader’ events to travel]( Make a contribution today You can choose to support The Independent on a one-off or monthly basis from as little as £5. Every penny will fund the high-quality, public-interest journalism you value most. We really appreciate every contribution we receive, no matter how big or small. [Contribute]( [The Independent] [Facebook]( [Twitter]( Please do not reply directly to this email If you no longer wish to receive emails about exclusive offers, events and services from The Independent, please [unsubscribe](list_name=IND_Marketing_CDP). If you no longer wish to receive any newsletters or promotional emails from The Independent, you can unsubscribe [here](. This email was sent by Independent Digital News and Media Ltd, 2 Derry Street, London W8 5HF. Registered in England and Wales with company number 07320345 Read our [privacy notice]( and [cookie policy]( Read this email [online](

Marketing emails from independent.co.uk

View More
Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

08/11/2024

Sent On

08/11/2024

Sent On

03/11/2024

Sent On

02/11/2024

Sent On

30/10/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.