Newsletter Subject

American Equity, by OpenAI's Sam Altman

From

hackernoon.com

Email Address

stories@hackernoon.com

Sent On

Tue, Dec 6, 2022 12:06 AM

Email Preheader Text

Any thoughts on this essay, {NAME}? Hello again, {NAME}! in 2017, Sam Altman, the founder/CEO of Ope

Any thoughts on this essay, {NAME}? [HackerNoon: How Hackers Start Their Afternoons]( Hello again, {NAME}! in 2017, Sam Altman, the founder/CEO of OpenAI, the creator behind [ChatGPT]( published an essay with HackerNoon titled [American Equity]( that sparked a lot of interest among our readers. We think it's time we resurface this extremely timely and important essay. [Click here to answer the question(s) at the end for a chance to be featured in our next HackerNoon newsletter to 254k humans]( [American Equity, by Sam Altman]( Sam Altman: I’d like feedback on the following idea. I think that every adult US citizen should get an annual share of the US GDP. I believe that owning something like a share in America would align all of us in making the country as successful as possible — the better the country does, the better everyone does — and give more people a fair shot at achieving the life they want. And we all work together to create the system that generates so much prosperity. I believe that a new social contract like what I’m suggesting here — where we agree to a floor and no ceiling — would lead to a huge increase in US prosperity and keep us in the global lead. Countries that concentrate wealth in a small number of families do worse over the long term — if we don’t take a radical step toward a fair, inclusive system, we will not be the leading country in the world for much longer. This would harm all Americans more than most realize. There are historical examples of countries giving out land to citizens (such as the Homestead Acts in the US) as a way to distribute the resources people needed to succeed. Today, the fundamental input to wealth generation isn’t farmland, but money and ideas — you really do need money to make money. American Equity would also cushion the transition from the jobs of today to the jobs of tomorrow. Automation holds the promise of creating more abundance than we ever dreamed possible, but it’s going to significantly change how we think about work. If everyone benefits more directly from economic growth, then it will be easier to move faster toward this better world. The default case for automation is to concentrate wealth (and therefore power) in a tiny number of hands. America has repeatedly found ways to challenge this sort of concentration, and we need to do so again. The joint-stock company was one of the most important inventions in human history. It allowed us to align a lot of people in pursuit of a common goal and accomplish things no individual could. Obviously, the US is not a company, but I think a similar model can work for the US as well as it does for companies. A proposal like this obviously requires a lot of new funding [1] to do at large scale, but I think we could start very small — a few hundred dollars per citizen per year — and ramp it up to a long-term target of 10–20% of GDP per year when the GDP per capita doubles. I have no delusions about the challenges of such a program. There would be difficult consequences for things like immigration policy that will need a lot of discussion. We’d also need to figure out rules about transferability and borrowing against this equity. And we’d need to set it up in a way that does not exacerbate short-term thinking or favor unsustainable growth. However, as the economy grows, we could imagine a world in which every American would have their basic needs guaranteed. Absolute poverty would be eliminated, and we would no longer motivate people through the fear of not being able to eat. In addition to being the obviously right thing to do, eliminating poverty will increase productivity. American Equity would create a society that I believe would work much better than what we have today. It would free Americans to work on what they really care about, improve social cohesion, and incentivize everyone to think about ways to grow the whole pie. Do you have any thoughts on this essay?Answer any of these questions (or add your own) for a chance to be featured in HackerNoon’s next newsletter to our 254k subscribers. [Simply submit a story to HackerNoon]( the headline Re: Sam Altman’s American Equity - What are your thoughts on giving every adult US citizen an annual share of the US GDP? - Many pointed out the incentive challenge of such a program. How do you think one could incentivize it? - China's social rating system looks the most similar to this system. Do you know of this system or any other historically or currently relevant examples? - Implementations seem to be of great concern. How do you think abuse could be mitigated, to the extent that it could? - Is GDP the answer? What could be some other long lasting source of wealth? - Is income inequality the right target? In other words, does “poverty” define the ultimate human’s misery? - How will this negatively or positively impact American’s standing in the world, considering the current political climate? - How could you apply this thinking to your country? - Could we achieve “global equity”? - How does tech play a role in this equation? Particularly, with the advance in the past few years of many technologies, such as AI, ML, and blockchain? Until next time, Keep on writing 💚 The [HackerNoon]( Editorial Team To unsubscribe from this type of Weekly/Biweekly Writer’s Note emails, click [here]( set email preference and/or unsubscribe from all other HackerNoon emails, click [h](. [Unsubscribe From This List]( | [Manage Email Preferences](

Marketing emails from hackernoon.com

View More
Sent On

13/12/2023

Sent On

13/12/2023

Sent On

13/12/2023

Sent On

13/12/2023

Sent On

13/12/2023

Sent On

12/12/2023

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.