Newsletter Subject

Hackaday Newsletter 0x4C

From

hackaday.com

Email Address

editor@hackaday.com

Sent On

Fri, Aug 26, 2022 04:27 PM

Email Preheader Text

Quantum mechanics -- the strangest theory -- came from some pretty pedestrian observations. Unpackin

Quantum mechanics -- the strangest theory -- came from some pretty pedestrian observations. [HACKADAY]( Unpacking the Stowaway Science Aboard Artemis I [Read Article Now»]( The Quiet Before the Storm? By [Elliot Williams]( My wife and I are reading a book about physics in the early 1900s. It’s half history of science and half biography of some of the most famous physicists, and it’s good fun. But it got me thinking about the state of physics 120 years ago. What we’d now call classical mechanics was fully settled for quite a while, and even the mysterious electricity and magnetism had been [recently put to rest by Maxwell and Heaviside](. It seemed like there was nothing left to explain for a while. And then all the doors broke wide open. As much as I personally like Einstein’s relativity work, I’d say the most revolutionary change in perspective, and driver of the most research in the intervening century, was quantum mechanics. And how did it all start? In the strangest of ways – with [Niels Bohr worrying about why hydrogen and helium gasses gave off particular colors]( when ionized, which lead to his model of the atom and the idea of energy in quantum packets. Or maybe it was [De Broglie’s idea that electrons could behave like waves]( or magnets, from slit and cathode-ray experiments respectively that lead to Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle. Either way, the birth of the strangest and most profound physics revolution – quantum mechanics – came from answering some ridiculously simple and straightforward questions. Why does helium emit pink, and how do TVs work? (I know, they didn’t have TVs yet…) Nobody looking at these phenomena, apart or together, could have thought that answering them would have required a complete re-thinking of how we think about reality. And yet it did. I can’t help but wonder if there are, in addition to the multi-bazillion dollar projects like the Large Hadron Collider or the James Webb Space Telescope, some simpler phenomena out there that we should be asking “why?” about. Are we in a similar quiet before the storm? Or is it really true that the way to keep pushing back the boundaries of our ignorance is through these mega-projects? From the Blog --------------------------------------------------------------- [I3C — No Typo — Wants to Be Your Serial Bus]( By [Al Williams]( Move over I2C, there is a new kid on the block. It is more flexible, but more complicated and less open. Al kicks the tires. [Read more »]( [How Resilient is the Natural Gas Grid?]( By [Dan Maloney]( What powers all of the infrastructure on gas pipelines? Would you believe, gas? [Read more »]( [Space-Based Solar Power: Folly Or Stroke Of Genius?]( By [Maya Posch]( The sun never sets in outer space, but does that make beaming power down to earth plausible? [Read more »]( [Hackaday Podcast]( [Hackaday Podcast 183: Stowaway Science, Cold Basements, and Warm Beers]( By [Hackaday Editors]( What happened last week on Hackaday? The Podcast will get you up to speed. [Read more »]( If You Missed It --------------------------------------------------------------- [Building A Spot Welder From 500 Junk Capacitors]( [PicoStepSeq Is Small But Perfectly Formed]( [Make Multi-Material Resin Prints With A Syringe (And A Bit Of Patience)]( [Everything You Didn’t Know You Need to Know About Glitching Attacks]( [Pi Pico Gives Its Life for Overclocking]( [Hackaday]( NEVER MISS A HACK [Share]( [Share]( [Share]( [Terms of Use]( [Privacy Policy]( [Hackaday.io]( [Hackaday.com]( This email was sent to {EMAIL} [why did I get this?]( [unsubscribe from this list]( [update preferences]( Hackaday.com · 61 S Fair Oaks Ave Ste 200 · Pasadena, CA 91105-2270 · USA

Marketing emails from hackaday.com

View More
Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

11/10/2024

Sent On

04/10/2024

Sent On

20/09/2024

Sent On

13/09/2024

Sent On

11/09/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.