Newsletter Subject

Today, I’m oversharing my LinkedIn analytics from month 1 of building in public: the good, the bad, and the ugliest...

From

groovehq.com

Email Address

alex@groovehq.com

Sent On

Wed, Jul 31, 2024 04:59 PM

Email Preheader Text

Welcome back to issue #5 of the Zero to $10M ARR newsletter. Today I’m oversharing my LinkedIn

Welcome back to issue #5 of the Zero to $10M ARR newsletter. Today I’m oversharing my LinkedIn analytics from month 1 of building in public. ​ I’m holding nothing back. Full transparency. We’ll be going in depth on the following: - My LinkedIn stats and metrics for month 1 - My best and worst performing posts from the month - Analysis and takeaways from month 1 - How we are iterating based on the data and the plan for month 2 ​ My aim with this issue is to give you a seat at the table for same conversations and analysis I’m having with my LinkedIn content manager. And if you dig it, [I’d love to hear your thoughts in the comments section on LinkedIn.](=)​ Quick context before we dive in: My goal for building in public is to share the “journeys within the journey”. This means being fully transparent about all of the components that that go into bootstrapping a startup from Zero to $10M ARR (in 3 years). In this spirit, I will be sharing my playbooks, analytics and takeaways for every aspect of building Helply. So, let’s dive into the stats, takeaways and analytics from month 1 of my Founder-Led Marketing LinkedIn strategy: Month 1 LinkedIn Metrics Follower Growth: As of this morning (7/31) we've added 1,001 followers going from 2,778 to 3,779 (25% increase from previous month) ​ That means in the 24 hours since I drafted this post we grew and took these screen shots we grew by another 65 followers. ​ Impressions: 97K (499% increase from previous month) Comments: 449 (490% increase from previous month) Engagements: 1,333 (259% increase from previous month) Likes: 866 (197% increase from previous month) Demos Booked: 48 (most important metric) ​ Best performing posts: ​ Worst performing posts: ​ For those who are interested, here are links to my 3 best performing posts on LinkedIn, and my 3 worst… ​[Best of post #1](=)​ ​[Best of post #2](=)​ ​[Best of post #3](=)​ ​ ​[Worst of post #1](=)​ ​[Worst of post #2](=)​ ​[Worst of post #3](=)​ Primary Takeaways: - Mediocre 1,000-word blog posts are DOA. It’s all about actionable, rich and in-depth long-form or TL:DRs, snippets and memes. ​ No in between. ​ Expand a thought into something valuable or compress it into a 1-tweet sized summary. ​ - Posts that utilize a slightly negative hook followed by actionable take aways have higher engagement. ​ - Posts that lead with a slightly negative / or conflict driven headlines and @ multiple parties (other companies, thought leaders, etc) and deliver actionable takeaways or lessons in the form of lists seem to achieve significantly farther reach and impressions. ​ - Posts that are published the same day as the newsletter have higher engagement. ​ This is (most likely) due to cross linking between the newsletter and the LinkedIn post, driving higher than average traffic. ​ - Post’s that feature an organic / DIY style picture with my face in it seem to be helpful, if it is accompanying valuable content. ​ - We tried to post a video with every single post for the first 2 weeks. there was no noticeable increase in engagement so we are using video more sparingly. ​ - Engagement from our ICP has been strong. The vast majority of new follows are CEOs, founders and operators. This is exactly what I want. ​ - I constantly ask myself, what content would I have killed to have 2 years ago (or even 10 years ago)? Create that. ​ - Go look at some of your favorite thoughtleader founders on LinkedIn, much of their engagement is driven by people who look at that founder as THEIR ideal target customer. ​ This is the opposite of what we’re trying to achieve. ​ I want the founders and operators to be having conversations and interacting in my comments. ​ So far, we are very much trending in the right direction. ​ - Top of funnel impressions are great but at the end of the day they don’t matter when you’re working in the B2B space. ​ What does matter? Are you achieving your core biz objectives. ​ If you’re a B2C or D2C company you may need 500k impressions to sell five $200 products. ​ This is simply not the case with B2B. ​ The real question is are you reaching the right people? ​ Is your pipeline growing? ​ Are you achieving the business objectives for that quarter? ​ You may only reach 100 people, but if they’re all operators and decision makers in your ICP, a dozen of those people could lead to a pipeline worth 6 figures in enterprise value, rather than hundreds of dollars or 5 figures in value for lower priced, volume driven B2C or DTC offerings. ​ So the real barometer becomes this: are we achieving our core objectives as a business with our top of funnel founder led marketing and content?​ ​ Concluding Thoughts From Month 1 Impressions and top line growth are great but only if it’s within your ICP and lead to real business outcomes.​ ​ ​I’ve ran the founder led marketing playbook before (albeit in the now antiquated medium of blogs) and it was the single most impactful marketing activity that took Groove from $0 to $5M ARR. My goal is the same with Helply. But this time with a much more sophisticated playbook (which I’ll be sharing completely and with full transparency in future newsletters as we create it and carry it out in realtime). Plans for Month 2 Iterate on what is working: - Actionable, rich and in-depth long-form from the trenches of building a startup - TL:DR Test out new formats: - Carousels - Curation posts (my takeaways from content I find valuable) - Deep dive profiles on successful SaaS founders and entrepreneurs with actionable takeaways - Relevant memes ​ The incredible thing about writing and publishing online everyday (especially on a platform like LinkedIn), is that the feedback loops are so tight. You watch what’s working and iterate with extreme efficiency. Few activities in life offer this opportunity for rapid improvement. As long you remain consistent and mindful about the nature of publishing online (i.e it is not going to be an always linear, up and to the right journey), success becomes inevitable. Alex CEO & Founder, [Groove](=) & [Helply]()​ P.S. I’ll also be posting on LinkedIn seven days a week, 365 days a year. I’d love to hear your feedback on the new newsletter in the comments of [my latest post.](=)​ ​ Let me know what you think in the comments. I read and reply to every single one. ​ ​ Don't want to hear from us? You can [unsubscribe here](.

Marketing emails from groovehq.com

View More
Sent On

09/10/2024

Sent On

02/10/2024

Sent On

25/09/2024

Sent On

18/09/2024

Sent On

11/09/2024

Sent On

04/09/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.