Newsletter Subject

Millions  think they "prevent cancer" with this potentially deadly screening...

From

greenmedinfo.com

Email Address

info@greenmedinfo.com

Sent On

Sat, Feb 11, 2017 04:49 PM

Email Preheader Text

New to our newsletter? . Feb. 11th, 2017 Dear Reader, As many of our readers already know, we have b

New to our newsletter? [You can sign up here](. Feb. 11th, 2017 [View this email in your browser]( Dear Reader, As many of our readers already know, we have been speaking out about the dangers of x-ray mammography and breast cancer screening programs since our inception. For instance, back in 2012, I reported on the [Dark Side of Breast Cancer Awareness Month]( pointing out that this annual "awareness campaign" was actually created by the very drug industry that profits from the overdiagnosis and overtreatment of breast cancer. Additionally, a year before, I reported on literature indicating that [Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS) IS NOT cancer]( only to be validated by a [NCI report published]( two years later which concluded the same. GreenMedInfo.com also features an [x-ray mammography research portal]( convincingly reveals this diagnostic technology causes far more suffering than it prevents, and may even cause breast cancer in healthy populations. And please consider, breast cancer is not the only cancer where the problem of [overdiagnosis and overtreatment is rampant](. You also have [prostate cancer]( [ovarian cancer]( and [thyroid cancer]( with millions unnecessarily harmed every year around the world. Not to mention, GreenMedInfo.com also features one of the world's largest archives of research on natural/integrative approaches to cancer prevention and treatment, which you can now access in one convenient location on our newly redesigned [Research Dashboard](. In light of this concerning issue, I want to bring your attention to two recent studies that further confirm the extent of the problem. In Oct. 2016, [JAMA published]( a review that confirmed once again there is an extensive overdiagnosis of small tumors which would never cause harm if left untreated. More recently, a Jan. 2017 Danish review published in the [Annals of Internal Medicine]( found: "Breast cancer screening was not associated with a reduction in the incidence of advanced cancer. It is likely that 1 in every 3 invasive tumors and cases of DCIS diagnosed in women offered screening represent overdiagnosis (incidence increase of 48.3%)." How many more studies will be needed for people to wake up to the dangers of x-ray mammography screening? We hope you will continue to support our mission by spreading our information far and wide. And please do consider [becoming a member]( so we can continue to provide information the mainstream media is loath to report on. For one day only we'll be offering a special 40% off any membership level, in an attempt to cover our newsletter fees which are well over 1,000 dollars per month. Use the coupon code "THANKS40" if you wish to take advantage of this offer! And thank you for your support! Warm regards, Sayer Ji Founder of GreenMedInfo.com Featured Research [Millions Wrongly Treated for 'Cancer,' National Cancer Institute Panel Confirms]( by Sayer Ji A devastating new report commissioned by the National Cancer Institute reveals that our 40-year long 'War on Cancer' has been waged against a vastly misunderstood 'enemy,' that in many cases represented no threat to human health whatsoever. [Click to Read]( ['Cancer Screening Has Never Saved Lives' - BMJ Study Concludes]( by Sayer Ji Millions have marched for "cancer causes." Millions more have been diagnosed "early" and now believe screening saved their lives. But a new study confirms something we have been reporting on since our inception: In most cases, screening not only has not "saved lives," but actually increases your risk of dying. [Click to Read]( Special Membership Offer- One Day Only! Use the Coupon Code "THANKS40" for 40% OFF! Membership is the Heart and Soul of What Makes Our Resource Possible. Please consider becoming a member to support our ongoing maintenance and growth, as well as to help us provide an alternative and independent media platform. [Learn more about membership benefits here](. Download Your FREE Guide Now [Get The Free Guide of Chris Wark, Who Healed Cancer without Chemo/Radiation]( Food for Thought [Facebook]( [Facebook]( [Twitter]( [Twitter]( [Website]( [Website]( Copyright © 2017 GreenMedInfo, All rights reserved. You are receiving this email because you opted in at our website: www.greenmedinfo.com, tv.greenmedinfo.com, or our Facebook page Our mailing address is: GreenMedInfo 27499 Riverview Center Blvd. Bonita Springs, FL 34134 [Add us to your address book]( [unsubscribe from this list]( [update subscription preferences]( [MailChimp Email Marketing](

Marketing emails from greenmedinfo.com

View More
Sent On

10/11/2024

Sent On

07/11/2024

Sent On

06/11/2024

Sent On

05/11/2024

Sent On

04/11/2024

Sent On

28/10/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.