Newsletter Subject

Junk science at the center of the abortion case before SCOTUS

From

goroffforcongress.com

Email Address

info@goroffforcongress.com

Sent On

Sun, Feb 18, 2024 10:36 PM

Email Preheader Text

{NAME}, Earlier this month we learned that the studies at the center of the mifepristone case before

{NAME}, Earlier this month we learned that the studies at the center of the mifepristone case before the Supreme Court were revoked by the journal that originally published them. Both studies, cited multiple times by the conservative, Trump-appointed federal judge who first ruled on the case, were found to be deeply flawed. As a scientist, I am not surprised by this development. Even before this controversial ruling, there were widespread reports about the lack of scientific basis for these studies, including a conflict of interest in who funded them to begin with. [A graphic featuring a headline from AP/Newsday which reads: “Studies cited in case over abortion pill are retracted due to flaws and conflicts of interest.” Included is a black and white photo of someone holding a mifepristone pill in their hand preparing to take the medication.]( Here are the facts: more than 99% of patients who have a medicated abortion have no serious complications. These sham studies were funded by anti-abortion extremists for the sole purpose of creating a legal framework to deny women safe abortions. Now, alarmingly, Donald Trump has announced his support for a federal abortion ban. Make no mistake, if Republicans are in control of the federal government, they will pass a national abortion ban. I’m running for Congress to make sure that doesn’t happen and to restore reproductive freedom nationally. To protect women’s rights, we have to take back the House majority, and the path to flipping the House runs through Long Island. Can I count on your support with a contribution of $50, $25, or $10 now? You can give directly here: [( The decision to have an abortion is an intensely personal one that should only involve a woman and her healthcare professionals. Partisan judges and lawmakers do not belong in that process. Unlike my opponent, who voted to punish doctors for providing reproductive care, when I serve in Congress I will work tirelessly to restore reproductive freedom across the nation. Thank you for your support for my campaign and for engaging on this very important issue. Together we can protect reproductive freedom for all. With my thanks, Nancy [Support Nancy today >>](   Follow Nancy's campaign on social: [Facebook]( [Twitter]( [Instagram]( [flickr](   ©2024 Goroff for Congress, all rights reserved Paid for by Goroff for Congress Goroff for Congress PO Box 215 East Setauket, NY 11733 United States If you wish to receive fewer emails from the Goroff for Congress campaign please click [here](. If you believe you received this message in error or wish to no longer receive email from us, please click to [unsubscribe](.

Marketing emails from goroffforcongress.com

View More
Sent On

24/04/2024

Sent On

22/04/2024

Sent On

20/04/2024

Sent On

19/04/2024

Sent On

18/04/2024

Sent On

17/04/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.