Newsletter Subject

Do You Need a Drink Too?

From

godesburgfinancialpublishing.com

Email Address

info@godesburgfinancialpublishing.com

Sent On

Thu, Sep 9, 2021 05:35 PM

Email Preheader Text

The U.S. government is going to allow e-cigarettes to endure… for now. But look for more regula

The U.S. government is going to allow e-cigarettes to endure… for now. But look for more regulation, more intervention, and more uncertainty in a handful of sectors. ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌   Do You Need a Drink Too? Dear Reader, I’m on day nine of this diet, workout routine, and shunning of the alcoholic spirit. This will be a 60-day effort. And the deeper I go, the better that scotch looks whenever I read the news. Momentum is negative again today, the result of a massive switch over the last 48 hours. The markets don’t want to pick a direction, and capital continues to pour out of the small-, nano-, and micro-cap space. With so much money flowing, it sure is a blessing that Janet Yellen and Joe Biden are now proposing a massive financial surveillance state that will monitor your every financial move so that they can raise taxes and ensure you’re being compliant with the IRS (you know… for the children). The story that didn’t quite make the radar for most people was the Food and Drug Administration’s decision to delay any ruling on the future of e-cigarette company Juul. To protect the children, the FDA could outright ban the sale of Juul e-cigarettes, a decision that would cripple the company and its investors like Altria (MO). Now, I have some pretty personal views about smoking. But I want to highlight something critical. Remember that e-cigarettes were originally supposed to be healthier and a better alternative than the pack. But the FDA is worried about the addictive qualities, the new health concerns around vaping, and… well… the children (always the children). That got me thinking about a wave of other companies in the world today that produced products that were supposed to be healthier for you. Yet, the deeper I dive, I find that they might actually be a real problem. Take Beyond Meat (BYND). This company was supposed to provide you with a much better, more sustainable alternative to meat products. Who doesn’t want a nice plant-protein-based patty to replace that steak on your plate? Sponsored Message ["Cheat Code" to MASSIVE Gains?]( Massive gains are simply not possible… Unless you had a number like this: [0001139685]( Consider it a ["cheat code"]( to the markets… Allowing you to potentially make higher gains than you ever thought possible. [Click here now to see all the details.]( Well, it turns out that Beyond Meat is pretty darn unhealthy. A 113-gram Beyond Meat patty has 250 calories, 18 grams of fat, 390 milligrams of sodium, and 20 grams of protein. And the volume of saturated fat is alarming. But what’s more hazardous to your health than the Beyond Meat pattie? Its stock. Beyond Meat is currently trading north of $111 per share. That’s above the Wall Street consensus, and there don’t appear to be any major catalysts to support the thesis. Not only do I think this is a fad, I think it’s a matter of time before someone in the government decides to issue a warning that this is not it’s all it’s cracked up to be. But if you’re looking for more concerns… look at the weak Piotroski score of 1 (signally a weakening balance sheet). Look at the dismal profit numbers and the stretched valuations. I have a friend who says that in today’s markets the fundamentals don’t matter. That is certainly true when we have mania as we did in 2000 and since the onset of the COVID-19 Bull market. But fundamentals matter when the markets are falling. With momentum in reverse, this is a stock that I worry about. It might not be enough to classify as junk food. But it’s a junk stock. Enjoy your day, Garrett {NAME} Chief Analyst, American Markets © 2021 Godesburg Financial Publishing, Inc. DISCLAIMER: COMMUNICATIONS FROM GODESBURG FINANCIAL PUBLISHING (GFP) AND EMPLOYEES ARE FOR EDUCATIONAL AND INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY – NOT INVESTMENT ADVICE: GFP and all the services it offers are for educational and informational purposes only and should NOT be understood to be securities-related offers or solicitations. None of GFP’s communications should be considered or used as personalized investment advice. GFP recommends that you speak with a licensed professional before making any investment decision. RESULTS PRESENTED ARE NOT NECCESSARILY TYPICAL OR VERIFIED: GFP communications may include information regarding the historical trading performance of gurus in their services (all verified by a third party), as well as testimonials of non-employees depicting profitable investments and trades that are believed to be true based on the representations of the persons providing the testimonial of their own free will. Please be aware that the claims regarding investing or trading results of non-employees are not tracked by GFP nor can they be verified. As always, past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. Therefore, results presented in this email should NOT be considered TYPICAL. Actual results can and will vary based on everything from experience, ability, risk mitigation practices, and market volatility... to the amount of money exposed in the investment or trade. Investing and trading are speculative and carry serious risk. You may lose some, all - or possibly more - than your original investment or trade. GODESBURG FINANCIAL PUBLISHING IS NOT AN INVESTMENT ADVISOR OR REGISTERED BROKER: GFP, including its owners and employees, are NOT registered as securities broker-dealers, brokers, or any sort of registered investment advisors with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, any state securities regulatory authorities, or any self-regulatory organizations. GODESBURG FINANCIAL PUBLISHING EMPLOYEES MAY HOLD SECURITIES DISCUSSED: If a writer holds any securities in a communication, it will be disclosed along with the information on the potential investment or trade. GFP, its owners or employees, have not been - or ever will be - paid by the issuer of a security mentioned in our services or communications. GFP, its owners and employees are paid entirely or in part from commissions based on sales of their services to subscribers. For more information, please visit [our disclaimer page here.]( Sent to: {EMAIL} [Unsubscribe]( Godesburg Financial Publishing Inc., 251 Little Falls Drive, Wilmington, DE 19808, United States

Marketing emails from godesburgfinancialpublishing.com

View More
Sent On

10/11/2022

Sent On

09/11/2022

Sent On

01/11/2022

Sent On

31/10/2022

Sent On

28/10/2022

Sent On

28/10/2022

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.