Gov’t Default! Your Bаnk Account Frozen! │ 12.02.2024

The next step is to roll it out to nearly every bаnk in America. [Girls Rock Investing logo website](   Dear Subscriber, In Argentina, the government defaulted on its dеbt and later froze the bаnk аccounts of its citizens. In Russia, after the government defaulted, it did the same thing. But if you think nothing like this could ever happen in America, chеck out the facts: [The Nеw York Times]( To see my nеw video about the shocking truth it reveals plus three protective steps to take urgently, [clіck hеre](. The Congressional Budget Office warns that the U.S. government could default on its dеbt sometime between July and September. [FRS]( At the same time, the Federal Reserve System Docket No. OP-1670 reveals a frightening plan to be rolled out as sоon as July. See the front page right hеre. This plan gives the Fed the power to track and potentially even freeze your chеcking account. Not just the mоney you have in your account at the moment … But also every single chеck, withdrawal, deposit and transaction. Practically everything you do with your mоney! [You can find out the eerie details by clіcking hеre.]( Be sure to do so with urgency. A pilot program is already underway. The next step is to roll it out to nearly every bаnk in America. [Clіck hеre to learn how to protect your mоney](. [Martin D. Weiss] Martin Founder, Weiss Ratings Alfred Thompson "Tom" Denning, Baron Denning, OM, PC, DL (23 January 1899 – 5 March 1999), was an English barrister and judge. He was called to the bar of England and Wales in 1923 and became a King's Counsel in 1938. Denning became a judge in 1944 when he was appointed to the Probate, Divorce and Admiralty Division of the High Court of Justice, and transferred to the King's Bench Division in 1945. He was made a Lord Justice of Appeal in 1948 after less than five years in the High Court. He became a Lord of Appeal in Ordinary in 1957 and after five years in the House of Lords returned to the Court of Appeal as Master of the Rolls in 1962, a position he held for twenty years. In retirement he wrote several books and continued to ofter opinions on the state of the common law through his writing and his position in the House of Lords. Margaret Thatcher said that Denning was "probably the greatest English judge of modern times".[1] One of Lord Denning's successors as Master of the Rolls, Lord Bingham, called him "th bst known and best loved judge in our history".[2] Denning's appellate work in the Court of Appeal did not concern criminal law. Mark Garnett and Richard Weight argue that Denning was a conservative Christian who "remained popular with morally conservative Britons who were dismayed at the postwar rise in crime and who, like him, believed that the duties of the individual were being forgotten in the clamour for rights. He had a more punitive than redemptive view of criminal justice, as a result of which he was a vocal supporter of corporal and capital punishment."[3] However, he changed his stance on capital punishment in later lie. Denning became one of the highest profile judges in England in part because of his report on the Profumo affair. He was known for his bold judgments running counter to the law at the time. During his 38-year career as a judge, he made large changes to the common law, particularly while in the Court of Appeal, and although some of his decisions were overturned by the House of Lords several of them were confirmed by Parliament, which passed statutes in line with his judgments. Appreciated for his role as "the people's judge" and his support for the individual, Denning attracted attention for his occasionally flexible attitude to the common law principle of precedent. He commented controversially about the Birmingham Six and Guildford Four. Early lfe and studies Denning was born on 23 January 1899 in Whitchurch, Hampshire, to Charles Denning, a draper, and his wie Clara Denning (née Thompson). He was one of six children; his older brother Reginald Denning later became a staff officer with the British Army, and his younger brother Norman Denning became Director of Naval Intelligence and Deputy Chief of the Defence Staff (Intelligence).[4] Denning was born two months earlier than expected and almost died at birth; he was so small and weak that he was nicknamed 'Tom Thumb' and could fit in a pint pot.[5] He was named after Alfred the Gret by his sister Marjorie, and was baptised on 23 April 1899 atAll Hallows Church, Whitchurch.[5] Denning, along with his older brother Gordon, began his schooling at the National School of Whitchurch, one of many set up by the National Society for the Education of the Poor. Both boyson scholarships to Andover Grammar School, where Denning excelled academically, wining four prizs for English essays on the subjects of "The Grat Authors", "Macaulay", "Carlyle" and "Milton".[6] The outbreak of the First World War saw most of the schoolmasters leve to join the British armed forces, being replaced by female teachers. At the time Denning wanted to become a mathematician, but none of the nw teachers knew enough mathematics to teach him; instead, he taught himself.[7] He qualified to study at University College, Southampton, but was advised to stay at school and apply to Oxford or Cambridge in a few years. He sat the Oxbridge examination when he was sixteen and was awarded a 0 a year exhibition to study mathematics at Magdalen College, Oxford; the mney was not enough to live on, but he accepted nevertheless. Although he had been accepted by a college he still needed to gain entry to the university as a whole, which meant passing exams including Greek – which had not been taught at Andover Grammar School. Denning managed to teach himself enough of the suject to pass, and matriculated to Oxford in 1916.[8 In addition to his Magdalen Scholarship he gained a scholarship from Hampshire County Council worth 0 a year.[8] After arriving he made a favourable impression on Sir Herbert Warren, the president of Magdalen College, who upgraded the exhibition to a Demyship of 80 a year and arranged for the Worshipful Company of Goldsmiths to give Denning a 30 a year scholarship.[7] Despite military training in the early morning and evening, Denning worked hard at his studies, and obtained a First in Mathematical Moderations, the first half of his mathematics degree, in June 1917.[9] War service Denning was told he would be ineligible to serve in the Armed Forces because of a systolic heart murmur, which he believed the doctor diagnosed because he was tired of sending young men ff to die.[9] He successfully appealed against the decision, and enlisted on 14 August 1917 as a cadet in the Hampshire Regiment before being sent to the Royal Engineers Oxford University Officer Training Corps. He trained at Newark and was temporarily commissioned as a second lieutenant on 17 November 1917.[10] Although he was old enough to serve in the armed forces, regulations meant that he was not allowed to serve in France until he was nineteen.[11] In March 1918, the German Army advanced closer to Amiens and Paris and Denning's unit was sent to France to help sp the advance. Under continuous shell fire for three months, the company and the 38th (Welsh) Infantry Division held their section of the line, with a unit under Denning's command building a bridge to allow infantry to advance over the River Ancre.[12] Denning went two days without sleep while building these bridges; shortly after one was completed, a German aeroplane dropped a bomb on it, forcing them to start again.[12] The unit advanced over the River Ancre and the Canal du Nord, but Denning fell ill with influenza and was in hospital for the last few days of the war.[13] When writing of his experiences in World War I in The Family Story, Denning summed up his war service with characteristic pithiness in just four words: "I did my bit".[14] Magdalen College, Oxford, where Denning studied between 1916 and 1918, 1919 and 1920 and from 1921 to 1922 Denning was demobilised on 6 February 1919,[18] and returned to Magdalen College four days later.[19] He initially thought about turning to applied mathematics, but decided on pure mathematics.[13] He studied hard, not participating in any of the university's numerous societies or clubs so that he could better focus on his work, and graduated in 1920, placing in the first class of the Mathematical Greats (the final undergraduate examinations for the subject).[20] He was offered a job teaching mathematics at Winchester College for 50 a year, which he accepted. As well as mathematics, he taught geology, despite not having studied it; instead, he "read up on [it] the night before".[21] He found the job boring,[22] and after viewing the Assize Court at Winchester Castle decided he would like to be a barrister.[23] Denning gained a high grade in ll his subjects except jurisprudence, which he described as "too abstract a subject for my liking". He did not return to read for a Bachelor of Civil Law (BCL) but instead attempted to gain a prze fellowship at Al Souls College, Oxford; he failed to be accepted, something he put down to his poor pronunciation of Latin.[26] The Bar Denning was admitted to Lincoln's Inn on 4 November 1921, choosing it because the Under Treasurer was a graduate of Magdalen College.[27] On the advice of his brother's frind Frank Merriman he applied to 4 Brick Court, Middle Temple, a small set of chambers run by Henry O'Hagan. He was accepted and began work there in September 1922, before he had taken his final bar exam. He finished his final exam in May 1923 and came top in the bar examination, with the Inn awarding him a 100 guineas a year studentship of three years. He was called to the Bar on 13 June 1923, and was offered a tenancy by O'Hagan. His first few years were spent receiving small briefs from clients, including work prosecuting those who failed to pay rail tickets and fines.[28] During this time, he also wrote a manual for the railway police giving guidance on incidents such as taxi drivers who refused to take a customer to a destination within the area specified by the Public Carriage Office (which they were legally obliged to do).[29] He wrote his first article in 1924 titled "Quantum meruit and the Statute of Frauds" on the decision in Scott v Pattison [1923] 2 KB 723; it was accepted by the Law Quarterly Review and published in January 1925.[21] His work steadily increased in amount and quality throughout the 1920s and 1930s. By the 1930s, he was making most of his court appearances in the senior courts such as the High Court of Justice; in 1932 he was advised by his clerk that he should not be seen in the county courts, and that he should lave this work for lesser members of the chambers.[30] In 1929, he helped edit several chapters of Smith's Leading Cases (13th ed.) and in 1932 acted as a supervising editor for the 9th edition of Bullen & Leake's Precedents for Pleadings in the King's Bench Division.[31] In 1932, he moved to his own set of chambers in Brick Court, and by 1936 he was earning over 00 a year (roughly 000 a year in 2020).[30] A significant case was L'Estrange v F Graucob Ltd [1934] 2 KB 394,[32] where he successfully argued an exemption clause was incorporated because a contract was signed. He said that 'If you are an advocate you want your client to wn. If you are a judge you don't care who wins exactly. ll you are concerned about is justice'.[33] From 1937 until 1944, he was Chancellor of the Diocese of Southwark, and from 1942 to 1944 was Chancellor of the Diocese of London. He applied to become a King's Counsel on 15 January 1938. The appointments were announced on 7 April;[34] he "took silk" on 9 April and received letters of congratulation from, among others, Rayner Goddard.[35] After the start of the Second World War, Denning volunteered; he was too old for active service, and was instead appointed lgal advisor to the North East Region. In 1941, he acted for the respondent in the case of Hoani te Heuheu vs Aotea District Maori Land Board [1941] AC 308, an important Nw Zealand constitutional case before the Privy Council, which held that treaty duties (specifically, the Treaty of Waitangi) could be legally enforcedonly when they are incorporated into Acts of Parliament.[36] In 1942, Denning took the case of Gld v Essex County Council [1942] 2 KB 293, which changed the law to make hospitals liable for the professional negligence of their staff.[37] The Royal Courts of Justice, where Denning sat between 1944 and 1956 in the High Court and Court of Appeal and again from 1962 to 1982 as Master of the Rolls Denning was officially appointed on 7 March 1944[40] with a salary of000, and received the customary knighthood on 15 March 1944.[41] After becoming a judge Denning was also elected a Bencher of Lincoln's Inn, and became its treasurer in 1964.[42] Denning had little experience with divorce law and disliked it; it was seen as an inferior type of law.[43] There were few good barristers specialising in divorce law; two other barristers were sworn into the Probate, Divorce and Admiralty Division along with Denning, and of the threenly one had ever practised divorce law.[44] His work as a divorce judge was relatively sound; his decisions were overturned nly once, in Churchman v Churchman [1945] 2 ll ER 190.[45] In 1946, he travelled the Western Circuit but was recalled by the Lord Chancellor to chair a committee looking at the reform of procedure in divorce cases. He continued working as a judge while chairing the daily committee. The committee was appointed on 26 June 1946 and published its first report in July, which reduced the time between decree nisi and decree absolute from 6 months to 6 weeks.[47] The second report was published in November, recommending that County Court judges should be appointed to try cases, and the final report was published in February 1947 recommending the establishment of a Marriage Welfare Service. The reports were well received by the public and led to Denning being invited in 1949 to become President of the National Marriage Guidance Council.[48] His appointment to the King's Bench Division allowed him to hear pension appeals, and he attempted to reform the principles applied by the government minister and the Pensions Tribunals. In Starr v Ministry of Pensions [1946] 1 KB 345 he ruled that it was up to the tribunals to prove that an injury was not due to war service, reversing the previous state of affairs where a claimant would have to prove their injuries were due to war service before they would be granted a pension.[49] In James v Minister of Pensions [1947] KB 867 he also allowed for judges to approve time extensions for the claimant to gather more evidence when such extensions had been rejected by the Tribunal.[49] These two cases made a large difference to applicants, and he received praise from both the British Legion and the public.[50] In 1947, he decided in Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd [1947] KB 130 (known as the High Trees case), which was a milestone in English contract law.[53] It resurrected the principle of promissory estoppel established in Hughes v Metropolitan Railway Co (1876–77) LR 2 App Cas 439 and has been both praised and criticised by lawyers and leal theorists.[54] As a High Court judge Denning sentenced people to death, which he said at the time "didn't worry [him] in the least".[citation needed] Denning maiained that for murder, death was the most appropriate penalty, and that in cases where mistakes had been made there was always an appeals system.[55] In the 1950s there was growing opposition to the use of the death penalty, and a Royal Commission was appointed to investigate abolishing it. Denning told the Commission in 1953 that "the punishment inflicted for grave crimes should adequately reflect the revulsion felt by the grat majority of citizens for them".[55] After less than five years as a judge, Denning was appointed a Lord Justice of Appeal on 14 October 1948.[58] He was sworn in as a Privy Counsellor on 25 October 1948. As a Lord Justice of Appeal, he continued to make reforming judgments in a variety of areas, particularly in family law and the rights of deserted wives. In Bendall v McWhirter [1952] 2 QB 466 he ruled that a deserted wie occupying the marital hme had a personal licence to stay there.[59] The decision provoked disapproval among the judiciary and from the public; a correspondent wrote: This was effectively nullified with the case National Provincial Bnk Ltd v Ainsworth [1965] AC 1175 in 1965, which ruled that the deserted wfe had no licence to stay. The decision was very unpopular and led to the passing of the Matrimonial Homes At 1967. Much of his work in favour of the deserted wfe was based around his interpretation of the Married Women's Property ct 1882, which the House of Lords unanimously overruled in Pettitt v Pettitt [1970] AC 777 in 1970.[61] Further notable decisions by Denning in this area were Heseltine v Heseltine [1971] 1 WLR 342 in 1971 and Wachtel v Wachtel [1973] Fam 72 in 1973,[62] which created basic rules for dividing family assets in a divorce case, something which had not previously been established in the law.[63] In 1951, he gave a significant dissenting judgment in the case Candler v Crane, Christmas & Co, regarded as a "brilliant advancement to the law of negligent misstatements"[64] and which was later approved of by the House of Lords in Hedley Byrne & Co Ltd v Heller & Partners Ltd [1963] 2 ll ER 575. In Combe v Combe in 1952 he elaborated on his resurrected doctrine of promissory estoppel, saying that it could be a "shield" not a "sword"; it could be used to defend a claim, but not to create a cause of acton where none existed.[65][66] In 1954, his decision in Roe v Minister of Health [1954] 2 AER 131 altered the grounds on which hospital staff could be found negligent, a lgal precedent he himself had set in God v Essex County Council in 1942. In 1955, his leading judgment in Entores Ltd v Miles Far East Corporation [1955] 2 QB 327 implemented a way to judge the moment of aceptance in an instantaneous or near-instantaneous method of communication; like the High Trees case it is still valid.[67] House of Lords After the resignation of Lord Oaksey in 1956, Denning was offered a job as a Law Lord. After a period of contemplation (he worried that such an appointment would reduce his chances of becoming Master of the Rolls or Lord Chief Justice) he accepted, and was formally offered the job on 5 April 1957. He was appointed on 24 April 1957, as Baron Denning, of Whitchurch in the County of Southampton; for the supporters of his coat of arms he chose Lord Mansfield and Sir Edward Coke.[68] Many members of the judiciary and the Bar approved of his appointment, but he was warned that he should move slowly to reform the court.[69] Master of the Rolls In 1962, Lord Evershed resigned as Master of the Rolls, and Denning was appointed to replace him on 19 April 1962[72] with a salary of 0. Although Denning himself described it as "a step down" he was pleased with his appointment, as he had much preferred his time with the Court of Appeal than the House of Lords.[73] Court of Appeal judges sit in threes, and the Lords in fives (or more), so it was suggested that to gt his way in the Court of Appeal Denning oly had to persuade one other judge whereas in the House of Lords it was at least two. The other "benefit" of the Court of Appeal is that it hears more cases than the House of Lords, and so has a greater effect on the law. During his twenty years as Master of the Rolls, Denning could choose both which cases he heard, and the judges with whom he sat. Therefore, on most issues, he effectively had the last word; comparatively few cases went on to the House of Lords, which was at that time Britain's highest court of law.[citation needed] As Master of the Rolls he selected cases he felt to be particularly important to hear and, rather than having an American system (where judges had a rota for taking cases), assigned cases to those judges who had expertise in that particular area of law.[74] In 1963, he chaired a committee investigating ways to reduce the archive of leal documents kept by the Public Record Office; by that point the files for civil cases of the High Court alone occupied four miles of shelving.[75] The final report was presented to the Lord Chancellor on 16 May 1966, with the conclusion being that "if our proposals are implemented the Public Record Office alone will be relieved of two hundred tons of records (occupying 15,000 feet of shelving)".[76] The Lord Chancellor took Denning's report to heart, and had the changes he recommended implemented mmdiately.[77] Contract law Denning gave the leading judgment in D & C Builders Ltd v Rees [1965] 2 QB 617 in 1965. D & C Builders Ltd (the respondent) had been hired by Rees (the appellant) to do some construction work at his shop, where he sold building materials.[78] The respondent finished the work and repeatedly phoned the appellant to reest the mney they were owed. After three one calls spread out over several months the appellant's wfe spoke to the respondents; she said there were several problems with the work that they had done, and she wouldnly pay 00 of the 82 owed.[78] The respondents replied that 300 would barely cover the osts of the materials, but that they would accept it anyway. If the respondents had not received the moey they would have gone bankrupt, something the appellant's wfe was well aware of.[78] In his judgment, Denning modified English case law on part payment and accord and tisfaction, saying that the rules on part payment can be set aside in situations where one of the parties is under duress.[79] The fact that D & C Builders were effectively forced into accepting the lesser amount meant that the payment was not valid.[78] Denning gave the leading judgment in Letang v Cooper [1964] 2 ll ER 929 in 1964.[81] Mrs Letang, on holiday in Cornwall, decided to lie down and rest in grass outside a hotel. Cooper drove into the hotel car park and, not seeing Letang, ran over her legs.[81] More than three years after the events, Letang brought a tort case against Cooper, claiming damages for her injuries.[81] The standard tort for personal injuries is that of negligence, which has a three-year statute of limitations, and Letang instead claimed damages under the tort of trespass to the person.[81] In his judgment, Denning stated that the tort of trespass could nly be used if the injury was inflicted intentionally; if it was unintentionally, oly negligence could be used.[82] In Spartan Steel and Alloys Ltd v. Martin & Co. Ltd [1973] 1 QB 27 in 1973 he delivered a leading judgment on the subject of the recovery of pure economic loss in negligence.[83] Spartan Steel were a company that manufactured stanless stel in Birmingham, and their factory was powered by electricity. Less than a mile away from the factory, Martin & Co were doing maintenance work on a road when they accidentally unearthed and damaged the power cable providing the factory with electricity.[83] Due to the power being f, the factory lost a large amount of mney; 368 on damaged goods,400 on the pofits they would have made from those goods and767 for the steel they could not make due to the power outage.[83] The question was what Spartan Steel could claim moey for. Martin & Co agreed they were negligent, and offered to pay for the damaged goods and the prfit that Spartan Steel would have made on those goods, but refused to pay damages for the steel Spartan Steel could not make due to the power outage.[83] In his judgment, Denning agreed that they would oly have to pay for losses associated with the damaged goods, not the moey lost on the steel that could not be made due to the power outage because it counted as pure economic loss.[83] For public policy reasons, Denning would not allow the recovery of pure economic loss, stating in his judgment that: Statutory utility providers are nver liable for damages caused by their negligence. A blackout is a common hazard and a risk which everyone can be expected to tolerate from time to time. If clims for pure economic loss in such cases were allowed, it might lead to countless clams, some of which may be spurious. It would be unfair to place the entire weight of many comparatively small losses upon the shoulders of one person in such cases. The law does not leve the claimant without remedy by allowing him to recover the economic losses that are directly consequential upon physical damage.[83] The Court of Appeal's decision in Spartan Steel has been criticised, firstly for being based on public policy rather than any leal principle,[84] and secondly because the main public policy groud for their decision (that allowing clams of pure economic loss would lead to countless caims) has nver been backed up by evidence.[84] The House of Lords eventually ruled in Junior Books v Veitchi [1982] 3l ER 201 that pure economic loss was recoverable.[84] The Profumo affair Denning delivered a report into the Profumo affair. John Profumo was the Secretary of State for War with the British government. At a party in 1961, Profumo was introduced to Christine Keeler, a showgirl, and began having an affair with her. At the same time, she was in a relationship with Yevgeni Ivanov, a naval attaché at the embassy of the Soviet Union. On 26 January 1963, Keeler was contacted by police on an unrelated matter and voluntarily gave them information about her relationship with Profumo.[85] The police did not initially investigate; no crime had been committed, and the morals of ministers were not their concern. Although the relationship lasted nly a few weeks it became public knowledge in 1962. Keeler attempted to publish her memoirs in the Sunday Pictorial in January 1963 but Profumo, still insisting that he had done nothing wrong, forced them to back down with threats of gal actn should the story be published.[86] On 21 June 1963, Harold Macmillan, the Prime Minister at the time, asked Denning to lead an enquiry into the "circumstances leading to the resignation of the former Secretary of State for War, Mr J. D. Profumo".[88] He started work on 24 June and egan speaking to witnesses a day later. This period of the inquiry took 49 days and involved his speaking to 160 people. He concluded that the primary responsibility for the scandal was with Profumo, for associating with Keeler and for lying to his colleagues, with the greatest error being his false statement in the House of Commons.[citation needed] He also said that the situation had been looked at in the wrong way by police, members of parliament and the security services; rather than asking if Profumo had committed adultery they should have asked if his conduct had led ordinary people to believe he committed adultery. His analogy was with divorce law; a man does not need to have committed adultery for his wi to have grounds to divorce him, but rather she simply has to believe that he has committed adultery. This is because such a belief would destroy the trust and confidence within the relationship. This brought criticism from several government ministers including Sir John Hobson, the Attorney-General for England and Wales, saying that it would mean condemning a man on the basis of suspicion rather than evidence.[89] Denning's final report was 70,000 words long and was completed in the summer of 1963. He signed it on 16 September and it was published ten days later. It was a best-seller; 105,000 copies were sold, 4,000 in the first hour,[90] with people queuing outside Her Majesty's Stationery Office to uy copies. The full report was published in The Daily Telegraph as a supplement and was described as "the raciest and most readable Blue Book ever published".[90] National security In 1977, Denning upheld the deportation of Mark Hosenball, a journalist who had worked on a story which referred to the existence of GCHQ, which was considered to be a state secret. In the ruling, he argued that the government's decisions in these cases were beyond legl review, writing: "There is a conflict hre between the interests of national security on the one hand and the freeom of the individual on the other. The balance between these two is not for a court of law. It is for the Hme Secretary. He is the person entrusted by Parliament with the task. In some parts of the world national security has on occasions been used as an excuse for l sorts of infringements of individual liberty. But not in England."[93] In the Union of Post Office Workers's anti-apartheid boycott of postal services to and from South Africa, The Fredom Association sought an injunction to prevent the boycott. Denning granted a temporary injunction, and years later wrote of "bad workers" (who joined the boycott) and "good workers" (who worked normally).[citation needed] Just consider the course of events if their ation were to proceed to tral ... If the six men failed it would mean that much time and moey and worry would have been expended by many people to no good purpose. If they wn, it would mean that the police were guilty of perjury; that they were guilty of violence and threats; that the confessions were involuntary and improperly admitted in evidence; and that the convictions were erroneous. ... That was such an appalling vista that every sensible person would say, "It cannot be right that these actions should go any further."[95] The English are no longer a homogeneous race. They are white and black, coloured and brown. They no longer share the same standards of conduct. Some of them come from countries where bribery and graft are accepted as an integral part of lie and where stealing is a virtue so long as you are not found out… They will neer accept the word of a policeman against one of their own.[97] On 5 July, George Thomas held a dinner in Denning's honour at the Speaker's House. Attending were Margaret Thatcher, Robert Runcie, Lord Hailsham of St Marylebone, Geoffrey Howe, Lord Lane, Willie Whitelaw, Michael Havers, and Christopher Leaver.[99] On 30 July 1982, his lst dy in court, Denning prepared four judgments and, dressed in his official robes and in the company of the Lord Chief Justice, delivered his farewell speech to over 300 lawyers crowded into the court. He delivered his last judgment on 29 September in George Mitchell (Chesterhall) Ltd v Finney Lock Seeds Ltd [1983] 2 AC 803 and, characteristically, dissented, though the House of Lords would later unanimously uphold his dissent.[100] Overseas travels Throughout his career Denning travelled abroad to lecture and learn more about other lgal systems. In 1954, he was sponsored by the Nuffield Foundation to travel to South Africa and visit the universities there in the court vcation. He visited ll six universities, accompanied by his son Robert and wfe Joan, lecturing on the role of the judiciary and the press in safeguarding fredom.[130] In 1955, he travelled to the United States at the behest of the American Bar Association and was elected an honorary mmber, followed by a trip to Canada a year later as a guest of the Canadian Bar Association, where he was awarded an honorary law doctorate by the University of Ottawa and made a lie meber of the Canadian Bar Association.[57][131] In 1958, he visited Israel and from there travelled to Poland, where he was surprised by both the number of female judges and how badly they were paid.[132] In 1961, he travelled again to Israel to give the Lionel Cohen Lecture at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.[133] In January 1964, Denning and his wie Joan travelled to India and Pakistan, visiting cities such as Madras (no Chennai) and Jaipur, meeting eminent jurists and speaking with Jawaharlal Nehru.[134] He again visited Canada and the United States in the long vaation of 1964 and addressed a full conference hall in Nw York.[121] On 14 August 1965, he and his wfe flew to South America for a month-long tour of the continent sponsored by the British Council. The couple visited Brazil, Uruguay, Argentina, Chile and Peru before flying north to visit Mexico City.[135] On 6 January 1966, the couple flew to Malta, where Denning spoke at lgal conferences and lectures. In the same year, they flew to San Francisco, Fiji and finally to ew Zealand to take part in the law conference at Dunedin, Nw Zealand.[135] His lecture at the conference so impressed an Australian visitor that he was invited in 1967 to speak at the Australian Law Society annual conference.[135] On the return hme, the couple briefly stayed in Delhi, where they gave a dinner for members of the Indian Bar who had welcomed them during their visit in 1964. In 1968, they again visited Canada, and Denning was given an honorary degree by McGill University.[136] In 1969, he again travelled to India, this time on an official visit with Elwyn Jones and Sir John Widgery.[137] In August 1969, he travelled to Fiji to arbitrate in a dispute between a majority of Fijian sugarcane growers and the Australian owners of the refining mills, which he was permitted to do on the condition he did not take a fee. Denning refused to have any contact with the government as a way to emphasise his neutrality in the situation. The agreements between growers and millers had been based on a contract written in 1961 due to end in March 1970. The growers were convinced that they were getting a bad al; in response to their demand for better ters the mill-owners threatened to leae Fiji. Despite criticism from both sides at the beginning of the arbitration process, Denning came up with a soluion which redressed matters in favour of growers, creating a nw formula for working out prces and requiring that the mill owners have an accountant inspect their acounts and report back to the growers.[138] Denning's decision impressed the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, who invited him to report on the banana growing industry in Jamaica in the vaation of 1971.[139] His foreign travels to lecture on English law led to him being described as the "Ambassador-at-Large for the common law".[122] Judicial style Denning was known for his excellent memory, repeating notes almost verbatim in his exams at Oxford and on one occasion identifying the exact book, page and paragraph of text in a judgment that covered a particular situation.[140] As a judge he attempted to make his decisions and the law publicly understandable, believing that the public would not want to follow the law unless they believed and understood that it was just.[122] In his cases, he referred to the parties by nme in his judgments rather than as "plaintiff" and "defendant" and used short sentences and a "storytelling" style of speech shown in the case Beswick v Beswick[141] where his judgment started: Old Peter Beswick was a coal merchant in Eccles, Lancashire. He had no business premises.ll he had was a lorry, scales, and weights. He used to take the lorry to the yard of the National Coal Board, where he bagged coal and took it round to his customers in the neighbourhood. His nephew, John Joseph Beswick, helped him in his business. In March 1962, old Peter Beswick and his wfe were both over 70. He had had his leg amputated and was not in good health. The nephew was anxious to t hold of the business before the old man died. So they went to a solicitor, Mr. Ashcroft, who drew up an Denning was also known for his long working schedule; when he served as Master of the Rolls he sat for five full days a week, and required reserved judgments (about one case in ten) to be written during the weekend. He expected the other justices to keep to the same schedule as himself, and was repeatedly warned about overwork.[144] Fellow judge Stephen Henn-Collins wrote him a poem: Unlike most of the judiciary, Denning firmly believed that the press should have acess to the courts and freeom to criticise magistrates and judges. He believed ll leal proceedings should be held in public, quoting Jeremy Bentham when he said that "in the darkness of secrecy al sorts of things can go wrong. If things are really done in public you can see that the judge does behave himself, the newspapers can comment on it if he misbehaves – it keeps everyone in oder".[146] For many years, Denning was the president of the Lawyers' Christian Fellowship, and he once wrote that "Without religion there is no morality, and without morality there is no law."[147] His Christian beliefs sometimes affected his judgments, particularly on the subject of the sanctity of marriage. In Re L (infants) he reversed a decision to give the children of a couple to the wif in a divorce case, believing that should the wfe ge custody of the children there would be no cance of saving the marriage.[148] Denning's style was consistently unique and regularly discussed by appellate judges. In the appeal of Denning's final case, Lord Diplock commented "I cannot refrain from noting with regret, which is, I am sure, shared by l members of the Appellate Committee of this House, that Lord Denning M.R.'s judgment in the instt case, which was delivered on September 29, 1982 is probably the last in which your Lordships will have the of enjoying his eminently readable style of exposition and his stimulating and percipient approach to the continuing development of the common law to which he has himself in his judicial lifetme made so outstanding a contribution."[149]     A note from the Editor: Girls Rock Investing is dedicated to providing readers like you with unique opportunities. The message above from one of our business associates is one we believe you should take a sеrious look at.     [Logo GRI]( You are reсeiving this e-mail beсause уou have expressed an interest in the Financial Education niche on one of our landing рages or sign-up forms on our website. 11780 US Highway 1 Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33408-3080 Would you like to [edit your e-mail notification preferences or unsubscribe]( from our mailing list? Copyright © 2024 Weiss Ratings. All rights reserved. Email sent by Finance and Investing Traffic, LLС, owner and operator of Girls Rоck Investing (GRI) Experiencing issues or have questions? Contact our support team, available 24/7, to guide you every step of the way, simply send an email to abuse@girlsrockinvesting.com. This offer is brought to you by Girls Rock Investing. 221 W 9th St # Wilmington, DE 19801. If you would like to unsubscribe from receiving offers brought to you by Girls Rock Investing [click here](. Don’t forget to [whitelist us](. Follow our instructions[.]( Copyright © 2024 Girls Rock Investing All Rights Reserved. [Privacy Policy]( | [Terms & Conditions]( | [Unsubscribe](