Newsletter Subject

🌱Climate change management worse under Trump, study finds

From

gazette.com

Email Address

noreply@gazette.com

Sent On

Sat, Mar 9, 2019 05:04 PM

Email Preheader Text

This week's newsletter focuses almost exclusively on the human impact on the environment. Whether it

This week's newsletter focuses almost exclusively on the human impact on the environment. Whether it is overt - like the Trump administration's attempts to rollback climate and environment legislation - or not as explicitly intentional - like the human impact on West Coast killer whales - humans are proving to be the fifth element (credit to James Balog, for the term). What this newsletter also highlights is the human element of raising ourselves out of the problem that we have largely created. From grassroots efforts to players on the federal stage elevating the conversation to a voting issue, it seems as though people are motivated to act, not just talk and watch the situation worsen. As an environment reporter, it's easy to focus on the doom-and-gloom, especially in the past six months. In fact, there's even a growing amount of scientific literature on 'climate grief,' a mental health condition that is impacting people overwhelmingly concerned with the impacts of a changing climate. Though understanding the possible, dire implications of our trajectory is important, many argue such pragmatism must be balanced with the innovation and idealism that can mitigate those consequences. The Seattle Times most recent multi-media project details plight of the southern resident killer whales, which the newspaper says is one of "the most-enduring symbols of our region and most-endangered animals." The series looks at the role humans have played in their decline, what can be done about it and why it matters. [Read More +](  [White House plans disputing climate change ‘will erode our national security,’ 58 ex-military and intelligence officials warn]( A group of former military and intelligence officials are criticizing President Trump for creating a committee that will scrutinize the government's own findings on climate change. [Read More +](  [Climate change gets worse management under Trump, investigation shows]( Government Accountability Office comptroller told Congress that of the threats facing the federal government, climate change management has regressed and is exposing the government to fiscal risk.[Read More +](  [U.S. plans end to wolf protections; critics say it’s premature]( U.S. wildlife officials are trying to end protections for the gray wolf, "re-igniting the legal battle over a predator that’s running into conflicts with farmers and ranchers as its numbers rebound in some regions," AP writes. [Read more+](  [LISTEN: The promise and peril of the Green New Deal]( The New York Times's Coral Davenport breaks down the origins of the Green New Deal, where it went wrong and where it could go. [Listen +](  [Plan to combat drought in West hinges on California, Arizona]( As Lake Mead and Lake Powell fall to historically low levels, the seven states that use the Colorado River are trying to save their water resource. Arizona and California have caused an impasse in negotiations. [Read More +]( What else we're reading this week - Logging opponents offer [highest bid]( in Bozeman timber sale via The Bozeman Daily Chronicle - Op-Ed: A guide to why a [very small number of physicists]( are climate change skeptics via Medium - The 2018 Farm Bill is [surprising climate-conscious]( via Sabin Center for Climate Change Law at Columbia Law School - How federal disaster money [favors the rich]( via NPR  [Quote of the day:]( ‘‘Imposing a political test on reports issued by the science agencies, and forcing a blind spot onto the national security assessments that depend on them, will erode our national security. It is dangerous to have national security analysis conform to politics.’’ -Letter from 58 ex-intelligence and military officials on the White House's creation of a committee to analyze a climate change report Tip of the day: Drop the soda and opt for water. This is not only good for your health but also reduces your aluminum and plastic consumption, as long as you have a reusable water bottle.  [Subscribe now!]( A free weekly environment briefing that comes to you. No algorithms, clickbait or ads – just what's worth reading. I've got your back Hi, my name is Liz Forster. I am an environment reporter and have a particular interest in public land management, natural disasters, climate change and ecology, among other topics. I received a degree in Environmental Policy from Colorado College and have worked for a Colorado newspaper since. Subscribe and each week, I'll comb through newspaper's headlines and send you the latest, most pertinent environment news. Questions, comments, suggestions? Email me at liz.forster@gazette.com or follow me on Twitter at @lizmforster. You're receiving this email because you signed up for Environment Weekly emails [Click here to see a web copy of this email]( Sent to: {EMAIL} [Unsubscribe]( Colorado Springs Gazette, 30 E. Pikes Peak Ave., Suite 100, Colorado Springs, CO 80903, USA

Marketing emails from gazette.com

View More
Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

19/11/2024

Sent On

10/11/2024

Sent On

09/11/2024

Sent On

08/11/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.