Israel under Fire and The West's Pusillanimous Response

In this mailing: - Richard Kemp: Israel under Fire and The West's Pusillanimous Response - Amir Taheri: Iran: Replacing Khomeini with Clinton [] [Israel under Fire and The West's Pusillanimous Response]( by Richard Kemp • May 14, 2023 at 5:00 am [Facebook]( [Twitter]( [WhatsApp]( [Telegram]( [Send]( [Print]( - Neither Ukraine nor Israel has any territorial ambitions or aggressive intent against their attackers — both Ukraine and Israel are fighting purely defensive wars to protect their civilian populations. - There is another common factor. Islamic Jihad in Gaza is an Iranian proxy terrorist group, funded and directed from Tehran. Iran's hand is behind this conflict.... - I do not recall any Western government or international body suggesting moral equivalence between the aggressor and the defender in the Ukraine war, but that is exactly what we have seen repeatedly in this and previous conflicts between Israel and Gaza with the UN Secretary General calling on "both sides" to exercise restraint. - Unlike the immediate condemnation of Russian violence, we have seen only silence in the US and Europe since Islamic Jihad's rockets began to fall on Israel. The best we have heard from the White House is that "Israel has the right to protect itself", a statement of the blindingly obvious. None of this is good enough when what is needed is the strongest support for Israel and the most blunt condemnation of Islamic Jihad, along the lines we see over the Ukraine war. - The usual media suspects, such as the BBC and CNN, both cheerleaders for Ukraine's defensive operations, have predictably been doing their best to slant their coverage against Israel. - As we can see from the Western approach to Ukraine as well as wars everywhere, no other country that is unlawfully attacked by a foreign power is portrayed as the aggressor or at best on a par with the attacker.... The IDF takes the greatest possible care to defend its civilians while avoiding unnecessary casualties among civilians on enemy territory, frequently aborting attacks when there is the risk of killing innocent people.... - Gaza terrorist leaders, on the other hand, make sure their wives and children are nearby and ready to die whenever there is the risk of attack against them. They deliberately position their weapons stores, missile launch sites and fighters among the civilian population, including in schools, hospitals and occupied residential buildings. The IDF will frequently warn civilians to get out of the area when preparing an attack. Understanding how this undermines their policy of causing maximum casualties on their own civilians in order to achieve international condemnation of Israel, terrorists in Gaza have warned their citizens that anyone who complies will be punished. - In such circumstances it is impossible for the IDF to do the vital work of destroying offensive weapons aimed against their own population and eliminating the terrorist commanders who direct them without inflicting some civilian casualties. Despite the misguided or malign commentary of some journalists, politicians, academics and human rights groups, such collateral damage is not illegal or a war crime, provided all possible measures are taken to avoid it. - In the last five days, more than 1,234 rockets have been fired from Gaza, 976 of which have crossed into Israel – a country roughly the size of Victoria Island -- with the remainder falling short into Gaza itself. The nearest comparable bombardment against Western countries was in 1944, when the Germans fired rockets at Britain with a maximum rate of 100 per day. Britain responded with a bombing campaign of devastating force in which many civilians were unavoidably killed. - The question Western commentators so eager to condemn Israel should ask themselves is: how many rockets fired into their own countries would be tolerated? - The Ukraine war has focused European governments' minds on this issue and their current planning includes not just improving missile defences but also offensive capabilities to strike at the enemy in his own territory, just as Israel is forced to do today. The Israeli military takes the greatest possible care to defend its civilians while avoiding unnecessary casualties among civilians in enemy territory. Gaza terrorist leaders, on the other hand, make sure their wives and children are nearby and ready to die whenever there is the risk of attack against them. They deliberately position their weapons stores, missile launch sites and fighters among the civilian population, including in schools, hospitals and occupied residential buildings. Pictured: Terrorists fire rockets at Israel from within a densely populated residential area in Gaza City on May 13, 2023. (Photo by Mahmud Hams/AFP via Getty Images) When Russia invaded Ukraine last year, Western governments, international organizations, media and human rights groups quite rightly rallied round without hesitation, recognising the need to give unreserved moral support to a nation defending itself from violent attack. We see a very different picture today as Israel is assaulted by aggressors in Gaza, to all intents and purposes a foreign country. There is some commonality between the two conflicts, although they are on an altogether different scale. Russia and Gaza's Islamic Jihad both believe the countries they are attacking are illegitimate, have no right to exist and need to be destroyed in their current forms by violence. Neither Ukraine nor Israel has any territorial ambitions or aggressive intent against their attackers — both Ukraine and Israel are fighting purely defensive wars to protect their civilian populations. [Continue Reading Article]( [] [Iran: Replacing Khomeini with Clinton]( by Amir Taheri • May 14, 2023 at 4:00 am [Facebook]( [Twitter]( [WhatsApp]( [Telegram]( [Send]( [Print]( - In an editorial last Monday, Kayhan, believed to reflect the views of the "Supreme Guide", claimed that now that the Islamic Republic has defeated the American "Great Satan" in the Middle East, it must deal with hyperinflation as "the greatest threat to our revolution." - The new tune may be partly prompted by a desire to cast the current nationwide protests as rooted in economic grievances rather than a rejection of the system as a whole. - Having registered four consecutive years of negative growth combined with a dramatic fall in the value of the national currency, the Iranian economy resembles a half-broken ship in a stormy sea with no captain in charge. Last "Black Monday," the Tehran Stock Exchange registered an all-time historic collapse in share values, wiping out part of the savings of an estimated 2.5 million small and medium investors. - Right now over 5,000 public and private sector projects are on "pause" for lack of funds or skilled workers. At the same time, the overall economy is estimated to be losing an average of over 1,000 jobs each day. Part of this is due to a bilateral trade agreement with China, under which Beijing buys Iranian oil at a 44 percent discount per barrel and pays the price in yuans, which means massive imports from China -- imports that destroy local industries producing similar goods. - A prominent Iranian economist, Hassan Mansoor, says that in Iran the government is "one of several players" in the economic field, each pursuing its own agenda and protecting its own interests." - Economic failure is caused by bad politics, not the other way round. Having registered four consecutive years of negative growth combined with a dramatic fall in the value of the national currency, the Iranian economy resembles a half-broken ship in a stormy sea with no captain in charge. (Image source: iStock) Is Bill Clinton replacing Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini as the "Source of Emulation" (marja'a taqlid) of the leadership in Tehran? Posed by an Iranian satirist, the question cannot be dismissed as a tongue-in-cheek quip on the new discourse developed by the Khomeinist establishment. In July 1980, the late ayatollah who founded the Islamic Republic told a group of university professors that the new revolutionary regime should not waste time on economic issues. "We didn't give so much blood for economic reasons," he boasted. "Economics is of interest only to asses." These days, however, it is Clinton's first campaign slogan "It's the economy, stupid!" that is bandied around in Tehran's ruling circles in various forms. Supreme Guide Ali Khamenei has led the chorus by designating the current Iranian year (ending in March 2024) as "The Year of Production", insisting that achieving economic growth is his highest priority. [Continue Reading Article]( [Facebook]( [Twitter]( [RSS]( [Donate]( Copyright © Gatestone Institute, All rights reserved. You are subscribed to this list as {EMAIL} You can change how you receive these emails: [Update your subscription preferences]( or [Unsubscribe from this list]( [Gatestone Institute]( 14 East 60 St., Suite 705, New York, NY 10022