America's 'Acute' Foreign Policy Disarray

In this mailing: - Pete Hoekstra: America's 'Acute' Foreign Policy Disarray - Lawrence Kadish: Political Mislabeling: Violating the Public Trust [] [America's 'Acute' Foreign Policy Disarray]( by Pete Hoekstra • October 26, 2022 at 5:00 am [Facebook]( [Twitter]( [WhatsApp]( [Telegram]( [Send]( [Print]( - Saudi Arabia is deeply concerned... that the Iran agreement will soon be back on the table.... The Saudis quite correctly believe that that the new Iran deal, rather than stopping Iran from developing nuclear weapons, would actually pave the way to nuclear weapons, in addition to giving Iran's despotic regime up to a trillion dollars -- if the mullahs would please just not use the nuclear weapons on the Biden administration's watch. - While the grisly murder of Osama bin Laden's close friend Jamal Khashoggi was far from acceptable, the sad reality is that the Kingdom is no more guilty of unspeakable behavior than are Iran, Russia, China, North Korea, Turkey Venezuela, Qatar or a number of other nations that the Biden administration and the international community are cozying up to. - Many onlookers believe that the Saudi move is a direct signal to Biden about Saudi Arabia's concerns over the "stalled" but apparently not-quite-ended-yet nuclear deal with Iran. - Although Biden supposedly will examine all aspects of the U.S.-Saudi relationship, he threatened the kingdom with "consequences" -- reportedly by suspending arms sales -- all because Saudi Arabia is trying to defend itself from being potentially obliterated by an openly hostile Iran. - The U.S. seeks to harshly punish any country opposed to U.S. efforts for a questionable nuclear agreement that would empower Iran, and vastly enrich it and its numerous terrorist proxies, including the Houthis, Hezbollah, Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad. Through them, Iran is already effectively in charge of four countries in addition to its own: Lebanon, Syria, Yemen and Iraq. - If the U.S. really believes Russia is an acute threat, the U.S. should act as if it is and stop propping up Russia's allies, such as Iran. - The U.S. should be working with countries in the Middle East to support efforts against Russia and Iran's regime. - No wonder questions are being raised as to just how "compromised" Biden might actually be. - The U.S. would do well to stop this foolish obsession with getting a new Iran nuclear deal. It is inconsistent with the rest of America's values, foreign policy and national security interests. Send a clear message to Russia, Iran's mullahs, Europe, the Middle East -- and, most importantly, to Iranian and American citizens -- that the Iran nuclear deal, finally, is dead. Saudi Arabia is deeply concerned that the Iran nuclear deal will soon be back on the table, as the Biden administration seeks to harshly punish any country opposed to U.S. efforts for a questionable nuclear agreement that would empower Iran, and vastly enrich it and its numerous terrorist proxies. Pictured: U.S. President Joe Biden and Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman at the Jeddah Security and Development Summit, in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, on July 16, 2022. (Photo by Mandel Ngan/Pool/AFP via Getty Images) The confusion and lack of clarity in the current administration's foreign policies are growing ever more dangerous for US national security. President Joe Biden's recently released National Security Strategy labels Russia as an "acute" threat to U.S. national security. Yet the administration continues, with the support and encouragement of the EU, its futile attempt to restart the Iran nuclear deal, using Russia as its proxy negotiator. One can only wonder how the Biden administration believes the U.S. can negotiate this type of agreement using a nation we actually recognize and label an acute threat to work out the details with a nation—Iran—we label as a "persistent threat." [Continue Reading Article]( [] [Political Mislabeling: Violating the Public Trust]( by Lawrence Kadish • October 26, 2022 at 4:00 am [Facebook]( [Twitter]( [WhatsApp]( [Telegram]( [Send]( [Print]( (Image source: Coolcaesar/Wikimedia Commons) Buried within the volumes of federal statues is a regulation that allows the Department of Justice to pursue those who mislabel a food product with a penalty provision that warns the guilty party "shall be imprisoned for not more than one year or fined not more than $1,000, or both." Federal prosecutors will surely go after you if you mislabel fruit as organic when it is not. In fact, state and federal law enforcement agencies have a blizzard of regulations they can harness when a manufacturer, company or individual engages in what can be described as deceptive consumer practices. It would appear, however, that the one area not particularly well policed is Washington's fondness for labeling things as they would like you to believe as opposed to what they are. Take the president's "Inflation Reduction Act." [Continue Reading Article]( [Facebook]( [Twitter]( [RSS]( [Donate]( Copyright © Gatestone Institute, All rights reserved. You are subscribed to this list as {EMAIL} You can change how you receive these emails: [Update your subscription preferences]( or [Unsubscribe from this list]( [Gatestone Institute]( 14 East 60 St., Suite 705, New York, NY 10022