Newsletter Subject

Iran Deal - Reportedly "Off the Table" - Would Not Have Prevented a War

From

gatestoneinstitute.org

Email Address

list@gatestoneinstitute.org

Sent On

Sat, Sep 10, 2022 09:17 AM

Email Preheader Text

by Majid Rafizadeh ? September 10, 2022 at 5:00 am - In spite of the opposition from US allies in

[] [Iran Deal - Reportedly "Off the Table" - Would Not Have Prevented a War]( by Majid Rafizadeh • September 10, 2022 at 5:00 am [Facebook]( [Twitter]( [WhatsApp]( [Telegram]( [Send]( [Print]( - In spite of the opposition from US allies in the Middle East as well as many US Congressman -- both Democrats and Republicans -- the Biden administration appeared determined to reward the ruling mullahs of Iran whose policies and ideology are anchored in "Death to America" and "Death to Israel". - The Biden administration seemed to hope that if they could just "contain" Iran with a "deal" -- put Iran "in a box" even for a few years -- it would "free up" the US to deal other problems, such as China, Russia, North Korea, Venezuela and the Indo-Pacific, with one less distraction. If only. - "If the regime in Iran, the world's leading state sponsor of terror, has proven anything, it's that it can't be trusted. The IRGC has directly, or through its proxies, including Hezbollah, Hamas, Ansar Allah (Houthis), Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ), and scores of Shiite militias in Iraq, killed hundreds of Americans, and attacked our bases and our allies in the region." — Congressional bipartisan letter to US President Joe Biden, September 1, 2022. - It is estimated that the Biden administration's new nuclear deal would have provided $1 trillion to the Iranian regime over a decade, making the IRGC and its militia and terror groups vastly wealthier and a far more savage threat to the national security of the Iranian people, the US, its allies, and American people everywhere. - It is also mind-boggling that the Biden administration was trusting Russia to be the sole country to oversee the compliance of the nuclear deal and to keep Iran's highly enriched uranium -- and able to return it to Iran if the mullahs requested it. - Fifty bipartisan US lawmakers had asked the Biden administration "not to permit Russia to be the recipient of Iran's enriched uranium nor to have the right to conduct nuclear work with the Islamic Republic, including a $10 billion contract to expand Iran's nuclear infrastructure. We should not let war criminal Vladimir Putin be the guarantor of the deal or the keeper of massive amounts of Iran's enriched uranium." - If the Biden administration believed that a deal with the Iranians would "free up" America to focus on China, and that the Middle East would just have sat quietly while Iran kept enriching uranium, they were living in a dreamworld. The Americans would instead have found themselves with hot wars on three fronts: Ukraine, China and the Middle East. - If the report is true, kudos to the Biden administration for a most wise decision. It is also mind-boggling that the Biden administration was trusting Russia to be the sole country to oversee the compliance of the nuclear deal and to keep Iran's highly enriched uranium -- and able to return it to Iran if the mullahs requested it. Pictured: Russian President Vladimir Putin and Iran's President Ebrahim Raisi hold a meeting in Tehran on July 19, 2022. (Photo by Sergei Savostyanov/Sputnik/AFP via Getty Images) The new "Iran nuclear deal," it appears, is "off the table for the time being." Let us hope that the report is accurate. In spite of the opposition from US allies in the Middle East as well as many US Congressman, both Democrats and Republicans, the Biden administration appeared determined to reward the ruling mullahs of Iran, whose policies and ideology are anchored in "Death to America" and "Death to Israel." The Biden administration seemed to hope that if they could just "contain" Iran with a "deal" -- put Iran "in a box" even for a few years -- it would "free up" the US to deal other problems, such as China, Russia, North Korea, and Iran's growing influence in Venezuela and the Indo-Pacific, with one less distraction. If only. [Continue Reading Article]( [Facebook]( [Twitter]( [RSS]( [Donate]( Copyright © Gatestone Institute, All rights reserved. You are subscribed to this list as {EMAIL} You can change how you receive these emails: [Update your subscription preferences]( or [Unsubscribe from this list]( [Gatestone Institute]( 14 East 60 St., Suite 705, New York, NY 10022

Marketing emails from gatestoneinstitute.org

View More
Sent On

03/07/2023

Sent On

27/06/2023

Sent On

26/06/2023

Sent On

26/06/2023

Sent On

25/06/2023

Sent On

24/06/2023

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.