Newsletter Subject

European Scientists Empowering China's Military

From

gatestoneinstitute.org

Email Address

list@gatestoneinstitute.org

Sent On

Fri, Jul 8, 2022 09:17 AM

Email Preheader Text

by Judith Bergman ? July 8, 2022 at 5:00 am - "Western universities need to understand that Chines

[] [European Scientists Empowering China's Military]( by Judith Bergman • July 8, 2022 at 5:00 am [Facebook]( [Twitter]( [WhatsApp]( [Telegram]( [Send]( [Print]( - "Western universities need to understand that Chinese military scientists have only one client, and that is the People's Liberation Army." — Meia Nouwens, researcher at the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS), Politiken, May 19, 2022. - "[T]here is an attempt to take as much knowledge as possible from our research communities back to China. In my home country, the Netherlands, there are researchers who have been working on artificial intelligence with Huawei instead of with NATO. It's the world turned upside down." — David van Weel, NATO's Assistant Secretary General for Emerging Security Challenges, Politiken, May 23, 2022 - In one Danish case... a Chinese military engineer, saying that he came from a Chinese research institute that turned out to not exist, collaborated with Aalborg University in Denmark on advanced radar technology. The engineer was, instead, from the People's Liberation Army Information Engineering University.... [T]he university did not take steps to vet the Chinese engineer's credentials. — Politiken, November 30, 2021 - "If you look at... 40 years ago, [the CCP] had zero satellites... They had no ICBMs... They had no nuclear weapons... They had no navy.... Look at what they have today.... We're witnessing one of the largest shifts in global geostrategic power that the world has witnessed." — General Mark Milley, Chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, breakingdefense.com, November 4, 2021. - British universities have accepted £240 million from Chinese institutions, many with links to the military, including £60 million from institutions sanctioned by the US government for supplying the Chinese military with fighter jets, communications technology and missiles. In... just six years, the number of research collaborations between scientists in the UK and Chinese institutes with deep connections to the country's defense forces tripled to more than 1,000. — The Times, February 4, 2022. - [O]ne of the UK's "foremost" high-tech weapons experts, Professor Clive Woodley at Imperial College London – one of the British universities that has received the most funding from China -- had been freely working with China for years.... Most of Woodley's research has been funded by the Ministry of Defence.... He has advised the MoD about many of its key lethal systems." — David Rose, investigative journalist, Unherd, May 21, 2022. - "Adapting to a world affected by the rise of China is the single greatest priority for MI6" — Richard Moore, UK's spy chief, head of MI6, Sky News, November 30, 2021. New research has found that European scientists have "shared militarily sensitive knowledge with the Chinese army on a large scale." 2,994 scientific collaborations between Europe and China have taken place with the Chinese military, nearly half of which involved scientists affiliated with China's elite National University of Defense Technology (NUDT). Pictured: The NUDT campus in in Changsha, Hunan Province, China. (Image source: Huangdan2060/Wikimedia Commons) New research done by Follow the Money, a Dutch platform for investigative journalism, and ten other European media outlets, found that European scientists have "shared militarily sensitive knowledge with the Chinese army on a large scale." The project, known as the China Science Investigation, collected a staggering 353,000 scientific collaborations between Europe and China and found that, of these, 2,994 have taken place with the Chinese military, defined as, "studies where scientists from Western European universities collaborated with Chinese colleagues directly linked to an institute that is part of the Chinese army." [Continue Reading Article]( [Facebook]( [Twitter]( [RSS]( [Donate]( Copyright © Gatestone Institute, All rights reserved. You are subscribed to this list as {EMAIL} You can change how you receive these emails: [Update your subscription preferences]( or [Unsubscribe from this list]( [Gatestone Institute]( 14 East 60 St., Suite 705, New York, NY 10022

Marketing emails from gatestoneinstitute.org

View More
Sent On

03/07/2023

Sent On

27/06/2023

Sent On

26/06/2023

Sent On

26/06/2023

Sent On

25/06/2023

Sent On

24/06/2023

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.