Belgium: First Islamic State in Europe?

In this mailing: - Giulio Meotti: Belgium: First Islamic State in Europe? - Majid Rafizadeh: The Love Affair with Syria's Dictator - Amir Taheri: Syria: The Defining Issue of Our Generation [] [Belgium: First Islamic State in Europe?]( by Giulio Meotti • April 22, 2018 at 5:00 am [Facebook]( [Twitter]( [Addthis]( [Send]( [Print]( - The leaders of Belgium's ISLAM Party apparently want to turn Belgium into an Islamic State. They call it "Islamist democracy" and have set a target date: 2030. - "The program is confusingly simple: replace all the civil and penal codes with sharia law. Period". — French magazine Causeur. - "The European capital [Brussels] will be Muslim in twenty years". — Le Figaro. Riot police guard a road in the Molenbeek district of Brussels, after raids in which several people, including Salah Abdeslam, one of the perpetrators of the November 2015 Paris attacks, were arrested on March 18, 2016. (Photo by Carl Court/Getty Images) The French acronym of Belgium's ISLAM Party stands for "Integrity, Solidarity, Liberty, Authenticity, Morality". The leaders of the ISLAM Party apparently want to turn Belgium into an Islamic State. They call it "Islamist democracy" and have set a target date: 2030. According to the French magazine Causeur, "the program is confusingly simple: replace all the civil and penal codes with sharia law. Period". Created on the eve of the 2012 municipal ballot, the ISLAM Party immediately received impressive results. Its numbers are alarming. The effect of this new party, according to Michaël Privot, an expert on Islam, and Sebastien Boussois, a political scientist, could be the "implosion of the social body". Some Belgian politicians, such as Richard Miller, are now advocating banning the ISLAM Party. [Continue Reading Article]( [] [The Love Affair with Syria's Dictator]( by Majid Rafizadeh • April 22, 2018 at 4:30 am [Facebook]( [Twitter]( [Addthis]( [Send]( [Print]( - Finally, a world leader, President Donald Trump, took a stance against the war criminal who rules Syria. Instead of supporting that action, however, many people have been attacking Trump for the clear message he sent Bashar Assad: He cannot use illegal weapons to target civilians and enjoy immunity. - Whoever appeases Assad and legitimizes his actions should be aware that they are complicit in crimes against humanity. Pictured: Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Ca.), then Speaker of the US House of Representatives, meets with Syrian President Bashar Assad in 2007. (Image source: AP video screenshot) Many people claim to champion the pursuit of justice and the defense of human rights around the globe. If there is an opportunity for them to make promises, they will. But when a true need arises, when their voices and rallying could make a genuine difference, many of those promises prove false. Recently, Syria's dictator, President Bashar Al Assad, attacked his own people with banned chemical weapons -- at least 50 times. The victims were mainly civilians. Innocent people -- men, women and children -- were suffocated by these attacks, but not before burning their eyes and drowning their lungs in fluid. Finally, a world leader, US President Donald Trump, took a stance against this war criminal. Instead of supporting that action, however, many people have been attacking Trump for the clear message he sent Assad: He cannot use illegal weapons to target civilians and enjoy immunity. [Continue Reading Article]( [] [Syria: The Defining Issue of Our Generation]( by Amir Taheri • April 22, 2018 at 4:00 am [Facebook]( [Twitter]( [Addthis]( [Send]( [Print]( - How could we not understand that in the anti-war coalition's Manichaean world, the role of evil was reserved solely for the Western democracies? - Over the past decade or so, Russia has waged war against Georgia in Ossetia and Abkhazia, attacked Ukraine, annexed the Crimean Peninsula, turned Chechnya into a pile of rubble and driven thousands out of their villages in Ingushetia and Dagestan without the "anti-war coalition" waving a single placard. - So what we have is a "lukewarm war" in which Russia's assets consist mainly of the anti-West constituencies inside Western democracies plus the veto power that Russia has in the United Nations Security Council. Pictured: Russian soldiers in Aleppo, Syria. (Image source: Russia Ministry of Defense/Wikimedia Commons) "We are here to protest against the bombing of Syria by Donald Trump and Theresa May," said the placard-waving young man sporting a ferocious beard. "Killing Muslims must be stopped," added the middle-aged lady dressed all in black with a demeanor of a diva. Our interlocutors were among a handful of activists from the "anti-war coalition," spending part of their weekend venting their hatred of Trump and America, and presumably of capitalism and imperialism in general, in front of the US Embassy in London. We asked whether they would also demonstrate in front of the Russian Embassy in Bayswater, a posher part of London? The answer was a chagrined look all around. How could we not understand that in their Manichaean world, the role of evil was reserved solely for the Western democracies? [Continue Reading Article]( [Facebook]( [Twitter]( [RSS]( [Donate]( Copyright © Gatestone Institute, All rights reserved. You are subscribed to this list as {EMAIL} You can change how you receive these emails: [Update your subscription preferences]( or [Unsubscribe from this list]( [Gatestone Institute]() 14 East 60 St., Suite 705, New York, NY 10022