Newsletter Subject

đź§€ The Beautiful Mystery Of Rodgers & The Packers

From

foxsports.com

Email Address

reply@email.foxsports.com

Sent On

Thu, Mar 25, 2021 11:34 PM

Email Preheader Text

There are still more questions than answers surrounding Aaron Rodgers’ future with the Packers.

There are still more questions than answers surrounding Aaron Rodgers’ future with the Packers. [View in browser]( [FOX SPORTS INSIDER WITH MARTIN ROGERS] In today’s FOX Sports Insider with Martin Rogers: Aaron Rodgers and the Green Bay Packers have a football marriage that simply doesn’t play out in the usual ways ... we take a look at the rising legend of Gonzaga star Jalen Suggs ... and we are treated to a must-see postgame interview by Texas A&M’s Jordan Nixon. Aaron Rodgers’ relationship with Green Bay has been through all kinds of iterations; a triumphant tale, a fractured rollercoaster, a (Jordan) Love affair and, according to the MVP quarterback himself, a “beautiful mystery.” So here we are, with Rodgers at age 37, coming off one of the finest seasons of his career, yet with the Packers a decade removed and counting from their last trip to a Super Bowl. And, suddenly, with another puzzle surrounding how much of a future this QB-team pairing has left in it. It is a football marriage that doesn’t play out in the usual ways. It is a dance. Mostly, Rodgers is its choreographer, leading the organization and the fervent Green Bay fan base through a series of hot-stepping twizzles that often leave everyone wondering what the heck is really happening. Many of his most revealing comments come from his regular appearances on the Pat McAfee podcast, which adds a layer of intrigue to the entire process, given that McAfee’s show is designed to be light-hearted, and Rodgers’ remarks can be vague, making sure no one is ever quite certain if he’s saying what it seems like he’s saying. It’s the offseason, so there’s not even any of that to parse through at the moment. There’s just, for the inquisitive fan, attempts to decipher the maze of action – or inaction – this time related to the unique delicacies of the salary cap. [STORY IMAGE 1] A fresh spate of speculation and wondering sparked up this week, and it all began when it was widely reported that the team paid Rodgers a bonus that he was due. Yep, that’s it. In theory. “Sometimes it’s frustrating to be a sports fan in 2021,” [FS1’s Nick Wright said on First Things First](. “(You) have to worry about dead money and cap charges, but if you want to understand the Aaron Rodgers story – that’s what this is about.” Here is where it gets a little convoluted, so just hold tight and we’ll get through it together. In 2021, Rodgers is due to make $21.5 million from Green Bay – a lower figure than you might expect because he took a large chunk of his four-year, $134 million extension in 2018 at the front end. Of that number for this season, $14.7 million comes in salary, with $6.8 million allocated as a roster bonus, which is the part the Packers just paid. Had the team, instead of paying it out, been able to negotiate a restructuring that would give Rodgers the same amount of income – like happens so often around the league - they could have saved significant room under the salary cap, up to $16.34 million if two voidable years were added. [STORY IMAGE 2] So why would they not? They’re not saying, but it’s certainly got people talking. “If your attitude is, we’re all-in on Aaron Rodgers and trying to make it happen while he’s here, that restructure should have already been done,” [NFL Network’s Mike Silver, who is very tight with Rodgers, said](. However, a full restructure of Rodgers would create a drastic bump in dead money cost, more than $28 million, in the event the team wanted to trade him after upcoming season. This is where the Love factor comes into play. Love, selected 26th in the 2020 NFL Draft (much to Rodgers’ chagrin), was brought in for a reason – the Packers thought he was their QB of the future. In 2022, he’d be heading into his third season, following two years of learning behind Rodgers. Perhaps that was the plan all along. [STORY IMAGE 3] “Why pass up easy cap savings that are gone now?” [wrote the Green Bay Press Gazette’s Pete Dougherty](. “Is it because they’re still working through the details that will give Rodgers certainty he’ll be their quarterback in 2022? Or are they hedging their bets and keeping as much of his money as possible off future caps because they might want to turn to Love as early as 2022? “For that matter, does Rodgers even want to come back to the Packers this year without some assurance about ’22 or beyond?” Lots of questions, and the people who know the answers, well, they’re not saying. “Rodgers is showing no signs of slowing down,” [former All-Pro Brandon Marshall said](. “This dude is coming off an MVP year. Why are we having this conversation right now? I don’t know if it is from Aaron’s side or the organization’s side. There always seems to be some kind of discontent. Why can’t you guys get this right?” [STORY IMAGE 4] That’s the most mysterious part of it. There’s a lot going on, you can be sure of it. What should be one of the most stable quarterback situations in the league is anything but. It is, as it always seems to be, a struggle for leverage and position. It is hard to imagine Rodgers playing anywhere else and it is hard to imagine the Packers with someone else under center. Not long ago, we said the same about Tom Brady. Football moves rapidly, and, in certain situations, in the weirdest ways. Rodgers has been with the Packers for 16 years and it’s still, after all this time, a dance. And the dance partners, at least right now, are out of step. [STORY IMAGE 5] Here’s what others have said ... Emmanuel Acho, First Things First: “I think the Packers are going to have to choose between the prideful wrong answer or the humble right answer. The humble, right answer would be to say, 'You know what? I made a mistake. We made a mistake. We shouldn't have drafted Jordan Love as soon, as quickly or as early as we did, because Aaron Rodgers is still good.” Desmond Howard, College Game Day: “I think this may be the last season that we see of Aaron Rodgers in Green Bay. He doesn't have a problem with beefs. ... Aaron Rodgers is ice cold, man. So, if the Packers keep playing with him like this, and if it's because of them that the contract was not restructured, I believe that this will be his last season.” Mina Kimes, ESPN: “I view it as strange given he's coming off an MVP season. You see teams in the NFC like the Rams or the Bucs going all in on this season restructuring contracts ... pushing money down the road to win. Meanwhile, Green Bay has a Super Bowl caliber quarterback, but isn't really doing much to improve their roster around him. They could do that if they restructured his contract. I'd be frustrated if I was Rodgers. There's no way to read that other than Green Bay wants to keep their options open down the road.” Sarah Spain, ESPN: “Even the captain of the boat stuck in the Suez thinks the Packers are being steered wrong here. It doesn't make any sense. You've got a team that can compete and win now ... an aging quarterback who is probably about three years younger than he really is because of the time he sat early who's got a couple more years. He was just MVP. But instead you're already trying to figure out how you're not tied to him too long. It makes sense why Aaron Rodgers would want them to have cap hits later on because then it's not that easy for them to dispatch him and move on. None of this makes sense.” [IN OTHER WORDS] - To understand Jalen Suggs’ astonishing rise to stardom, [ESPN staff writer Myron Medcalf]( spoke to those who know him best. Medcalf details the rising legend of Gonzaga’s star freshman. - The Cavaliers have not played Andre Drummond in a game since February after announcing they would trade him. So why doesn't any team want the best rebounder in the universe? [Sports Illustrated’s Chris Herring]( explains why rebounders have little value in today’s NBA. - A change in his shot distribution is leading to the best statistical season in CJ McCollum’s career. [The Ringer’s Kevin O’Connor]( explains how McCollum took the second leap of his career. [THE INTERNET IS UNDEFEATED] [THE INTERNET IS UNDEFEATED]( March is a month filled with madness on the basketball court. That was certainly the case on Wednesday night when Texas A&M’s Jordan Nixon hit a game-winning shot in overtime to lead the Aggies to an incredible 84-82 victory over Iowa State in a second round matchup. Following the game, Nixon gave a very raw, emotional interview where she gave a ton of praise to her teammates. “I say it all the time. And it really just goes back to trust. They trust me,” Nixon said. “They trust me to make plays. They trust me to lead this team. Win, lose or draw, every single person on that bench is behind me. And it just makes these moments that much more special.” Great play. Great interview. Great teammate. [VIEWER'S GUIDE] Portland Trail Blazers at Miami Heat (TNT, 7:30 p.m. ET) Damian Lillard and the Portland Trail Blazers take on Jimmy Butler and the Miami Heat. Boise State Broncos vs. Memphis Tigers (ESPN, 9 p.m. ET) Landers Nolley II and the Memphis Tigers battle Boise State in a second round NIT matchup. Philadelphia 76ers at Los Angeles Lakers (TNT, 10 p.m. ET) Ben Simmons and the Philadelphia 76ers go up against Montrezl Harrell and the Los Angeles Lakers. [BET OF THE DAY] [BET OF THE DAY] Odds provided by [FOX Bet]( FOX Sports Betting Analyst Jason McIntyre went 29-18 in the opening four days of the NCAA Tournament. Here’s a look at J-Mac’s Sweet 16 picks in the South Region: No. 3 Arkansas (-11) vs. No. 15 Oral Roberts The worst defensive team left in the tournament is Oral Roberts. Arkansas has an explosive offense that has topped 80 points 15 times this season. Yes, this is a large spread, but Arkansas’ suffocating defense is relentless. And let’s be real: Oral Roberts needed an epic meltdown by Florida to get here, pulling off a miraculous 13-4 run in the final 4:35. Pick: Arkansas -11.5 No. 1 Baylor (-7) vs. No. 5 Villanova Villanova arrives after double-digit wins against offenses ranked outside the top 90 in efficiency. Baylor has the third-most efficient offense in the country, and if that doesn’t scare you, Villanova is poor defending 3-pointers (236th) and 2-pointers (204th). The only discernible edge is Villanova’s great coach, Jay Wright, but his guards will have problems with Jared Butler (16.9 PPG) and Davion Mitchell (14.1 PPG). Pick: Baylor: -7 [WHAT THEY SAID] “I know I'm capable of greatness, and I'm expecting to reach that level. ” — Aaron Rodgers [FOLLOW FOX SPORTS] [Twitter]( [Facebook]( [YouTube]( [Instagram]( Download FOX Sports App: [Fire TV]( [Roku]( [Google Play]( [App Store]( [Fire TV]( [Roku]( [App Store]( [Google Play]( Also available on these devices: [fireTV | AppleTV | ROKU | Google Chromecast | XBOX ONE | SAMSUNG Smart TV] [fireTV | AppleTV | ROKU | Google Chromecast | XBOX ONE | SAMSUNG Smart TV] Trademark & Copyright Notice: ™ and © 2021 Fox Media LLC and FOX Sports Interactive Media, LLC. All rights reserved. Please do not reply to this message. If you do not wish to receive emails like this in the future, please [unsubscribe](. FOX Sports respects your privacy. Click [here]( to view our Privacy Policy. Fox.com Business & Legal Affairs - Manager Digital Media P.O. Box 900 Beverly Hills, California 90213-0900

Marketing emails from foxsports.com

View More
Sent On

08/11/2024

Sent On

08/11/2024

Sent On

03/11/2024

Sent On

30/10/2024

Sent On

30/10/2024

Sent On

29/10/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.