Newsletter Subject

Morning Distribution for Tuesday, April 2, 2024

From

fivethirtyeight.com

Email Address

newsletter@fivethirtyeight.com

Sent On

Tue, Apr 2, 2024 12:21 PM

Email Preheader Text

Morning Distribution Tuesday, April, 02, 2024 Your daily briefing from FiveThirtyEight -------------

[FiveThirtyEight]( Morning Distribution Tuesday, April, 02, 2024 Your daily briefing from FiveThirtyEight --------------------------------------------------------------- The Morning Story [Have Americans ever hated two candidates as much as Biden and Trump?]( [Have Americans ever hated two candidates as much as Biden and Trump?]( By [Nathaniel Rakich](/author/nathaniel_rakich) Shocking news: Americans are not jazzed about their choices in the 2024 presidential election. According to 538’s averages,* only 43 percent of Americans have a [favorable opinion of former President Donald Trump]( while 53 percent have an unfavorable opinion. And only 40 percent of Americans have a [favorable opinion of President Joe Biden]( 55 percent have an unfavorable one. It’s historically unusual for any major-party nominee to be this unpopular — let alone both of them. Using [538’s current polling-average methodology]( we went back and calculated retroactive favorability averages for every Democratic and Republican presidential nominee since 1980.** By late October before the election, only seven of the 22 candidates had negative net favorability ratings. Biden vs. Trump is one of history’s most unpopular matchups The average net favorability rating of each Democratic and Republican presidential candidate in late October* of presidential election years since 1980, based on 538′s current polling average methodology applied retroactively Year Democrat Net Fav. Republican Net Fav. Avg. 1980 Jimmy Carter -3 Ronald Reagan +18 +7 1984 Walter Mondale -9 Ronald Reagan +28 +9 1988 Michael Dukakis +25 George H.W. Bush +15 +20 1992 Bill Clinton +9 George H.W. Bush -9 0 1996 Bill Clinton +18 Bob Dole -1 +8 2000 Al Gore +15 George W. Bush +22 +18 2004 John Kerry +6 George W. Bush +5 +5 2008 Barack Obama +20 John McCain +9 +15 2012 Barack Obama +5 Mitt Romney +2 +4 2016 Hillary Clinton -12 Donald Trump -25 -18 2020 Joe Biden +5 Donald Trump -13 -4 2024 Joe Biden -15 Donald Trump -10 -12 *2024 numbers are as of April 1. Source: Polls If Trump’s and Biden’s net favorability ratings remain underwater through Election Day, 2024 will be only the second presidential election since at least 1980 in which Americans had a negative view of both candidates. The first was in 2016 — which also happens to be the only recent presidential election in which the two candidates were, on average, more disliked than Trump and Biden are now. It’s possible that, with most Americans [entrenched in their partisan camps]( and believing that the [country is on the wrong track]( we’ve entered an era of perpetually unpopular presidential candidates. Before 2016, no presidential nominee in at least 36 years was more than 9 percentage points underwater; since then, five of the six have been. Granted, that assumes that Trump and Biden will remain this unpopular all year long; there are still seven months until Election Day, which is plenty of time for Trump and Biden to improve their standings. However, three election cycles is just a blink of an eye in the grand scheme of American history, so this could just be a blip borne of this specific political moment (to wit: three of the five uber-unpopular nominees were/are Trump). That also raises a question: When both candidates are so unpopular, do their favorability ratings even matter? Let’s look again at our retroactive favorability averages for past presidential nominees — this time comparing each one to their opponent. Perhaps unsurprisingly, the candidate with the higher net favorability rating in late October went on to win the election eight out of 11 times. More popular presidential candidates usually win The difference between the winning presidential candidate’s and losing presidential candidate’s average net favorability rating in late October of presidential election years since 1980, based on 538′s current polling average methodology applied retroactively Year Winner Net Fav. Loser Net Fav. Winner’s Fav. Advantage 1980 Ronald Reagan +18 Jimmy Carter -3 +21 1984 Ronald Reagan +28 Walter Mondale -9 +37 1988 George H.W. Bush +15 Michael Dukakis +25 -10 1992 Bill Clinton +9 George H.W. Bush -9 +18 1996 Bill Clinton +18 Bob Dole -1 +19 2000 George W. Bush +22 Al Gore +15 +8 2004 George W. Bush +5 John Kerry +6 -1 2008 Barack Obama +20 John McCain +9 +11 2012 Barack Obama +5 Mitt Romney +2 +3 2016 Donald Trump -25 Hillary Clinton -12 -13 2020 Joe Biden +5 Donald Trump -13 +19 Source: Polls But this isn’t an ironclad rule. Three times, the candidate with the lower net favorability rating actually won (although one of those times, then-President George W. Bush versus then-Sen. John Kerry in 2004, they were effectively tied in favorability). And one of those times was 2016, the only other year Americans disliked both nominees. That year, Trump defeated former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton despite having a lower net favorability rating than she did (-25 points versus -12 points). It stands to reason that funny things can happen in the rare instances when Americans dislike both options. When one candidate is popular and the other candidate is unpopular, it’s pretty easy to predict what’s going to happen — the popular candidate is going to win. But when both candidates are unpopular, neither candidate can get to a majority without winning over some voters who dislike them. That means predicting the winner of the election isn’t as simple as just picking the less unpopular candidate. True, it’s mathematically easier for that candidate to get a winning number of votes, just because they have fewer “[haters]( to convert. But they still have to convert some, and that means forcing those haters to make a choice about who they hate less. That’s a different question than which candidate has a smaller number of haters, and it’s something a favorability rating can’t tell us on its own.*** Thankfully, some pollsters ask respondents not just whether they have an unfavorable view of the candidates, but also how strongly they feel that way. And on this score, Trump and Biden are more evenly matched. According to a simple average of polls conducted in March, slightly more Americans have a strongly unfavorable view of Trump (43 percent) than have a strongly unfavorable view of Biden (42 percent), despite the fact that Biden’s overall unfavorable rating is higher. Trump haters tend to feel more strongly than Biden haters Share of Americans who have an unfavorable and very or strongly unfavorable opinion of former President Donald Trump and President Joe Biden, in national polls conducted entirely in March Trump Unfavorable Biden Unfavorable Pollster Dates Pop. Strongly Overall Strongly Overall Emerson College March 5-6 RV 40% 52% 37% 50% YouGov/Yahoo News March 8-11 A 39 50 40 54 Lake Research/Tarrance Group/Georgetown March 9-14 LV 49 56 45 53 Echelon Insights March 18-21 LV 47 55 43 55 HarrisX/Harvard March 20-21 RV 34 45 38 51 Beacon/Shaw/FOX News March 22-25 RV 46 54 48 60 YouGov/The Economist March 24-26 A 48 56 45 57 Total 43 53 42 54 “LV” stands for “likely voters”; “RV” stands for “registered voters”; “A” stands for “adults.” When a poll released numbers among multiple populations, we used the broadest one. YouGov/The Economist released multiple favorability polls in March, so we just used the most recent one. Source: Polls This is, in a nutshell, why Biden is not necessarily doomed just because his net favorability rating is -15 points and Trump’s is -10 points. The candidate with the higher net favorability rating doesn’t always win the election — especially when both candidates are underwater, you have to consider how intensely those disaffected voters hate them. G. Elliott Morris contributed research. Footnotes *As of 9 a.m. Eastern on April 1. **Based on all the favorability polls we’ve collected in our database. For older election cycles, our database is not comprehensive, so we are very likely missing some polls; however, we have still collected enough that we’re comfortable generating an average. ***The same principle holds, in reverse, for elections in which both candidates are popular. If that ever happens again, maybe I’ll write about it outside a footnote! [Read more]( [FiveThirtyEight] [View in browser]( [ABC News]( [Unsubscribe](

Marketing emails from fivethirtyeight.com

View More
Sent On

09/05/2024

Sent On

09/05/2024

Sent On

07/05/2024

Sent On

03/05/2024

Sent On

02/05/2024

Sent On

02/05/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.