Newsletter Subject

Heroes, Hagiography, and Villainy and more...

From

feedblitz.com

Email Address

feedblitz@mail.feedblitz.com

Sent On

Mon, Oct 2, 2017 12:37 PM

Email Preheader Text

There was a time, and it was not so very long ago, that we wanted heroes who were flawless. We would

There was a time, and it was not so very long ago, that we wanted heroes who were flawless. We would look to the past to find people who had an outsized impact on our world and prepare biographies tipped well in the direction of hagiography. We might ... --------------------------------------------------------------- In This Issue... - [Heroes, Hagiography, and Villainy](#0) - [A La Carte (October 2)](#1) [] [Heroes, Hagiography, and Villainy]( There was a time, and it was not so very long ago, that we wanted heroes who were flawless. We would look to the past to find people who had an outsized impact on our world and prepare biographies tipped well in the direction of hagiography. We might read a thousand or two thousand pages on a great statesman or theologian and never encounter more than a cursory examination of their shortcomings. Even if we did, those flaws might be brushed aside as mere peripheral information, for we defined our heroes by their accomplishments. There wasn’t much we wanted or needed to know about their flaws and foibles, their sins and transgressions. Any failings we encountered were interpreted in light of their successes. It was the successes that loomed large in our memories and imaginations. Today we seem to have drifted in a very different direction. We look to the past to find people who had an outsized impact on our world and write biographies tipped far, far away from hagiography. These accounts of their lives may well discuss accomplishments, but they will focus equally on failings. If we used to demand hagiography, perhaps we now demand hagioclasm, biographies that smash and cut down our historical figures. We want to know everything we can about their flaws and foibles, their sins and transgressions. Any successes we encounter are interpreted in light of their failures. It is the failures that loom large in our memories and imaginations. The problem is, of course, that history is rarely so neat and tidy because people are never so neat and tidy. Unless our subject is Jesus Christ himself, we will always be left with messy sinners who at some times and in some ways are good and noble and at other times and in other ways are sinful and ignoble. Our choice is between flawed heroes or no heroes at all. The question is, can we admire them despite their imperfections? Or does such admiration necessarily downplay their flaws or make light of their sins? If we admire a flawed man, are we tacitly endorsing his sins? This question is rising to the fore when we discuss some of the men whose statues are being removed from American public squares today. This question is rising as we approach the 500th anniversary of the Reformation and consider the flawed Reformers. Robert E Lee has been praised as a man of great faith, but he also led an army dedicated to preserving the institution of slavery. Martin Luther launched and led the Reformation, but he was a man who had a shockingly sharp temper. So what do we do with such flawed men? Can we admire them? And if we do, must our admiration always contain an asterisk? Must we have a disclaimer on hand when we tell of the impact they’ve had on us or as we tell of their accomplishments? I continue to wrestle with this in my mind, but I think a key piece of the answer comes in the book of Hebrews. In one part of this letter, the author provides a kind of hall of fame or hall of heroes. Wanting to demonstrate the reality and power of faith in God, he describes some great believers of days gone by. In a line or two he describes the faith of Abel, Enoch, Noah, Abraham, Sarah, Isaac, Joseph, Moses, Rahab, then continues “Time would fail me to tell of Gideon, Barak, Samson, Jephthah, of David and Samuel and the prophets.” What stands out to me is that each of these people was deeply flawed. In some way each of these people was a woeful example of faith and life. Abraham was a bigamist, Sarah a doubter, Isaac a weakling. Gideon was a coward, Samson a philanderer, David a murderer. Yet here is how the author of this letter, and, indeed, God himself, remembers them: “who through faith conquered kingdoms, enforced justice, obtained promises, stopped the mouths of lions, quenched the power of fire, escaped the edge of the sword, were made strong out of weakness, became mighty in war, put foreign armies to flight” (Hebrews 11:32-34). As God and this author look back, they choose to focus on faith rather than dwell on depravity. It is not that those sins did not happen and not that they were unimportant. Rather, it is that these sins were forgiven in the sight of God. These people were defined not by their sin but by their faith. Abraham and Sarah, both of whom doubted, had faith to believe God’s promises and see them realized! Gideon, the coward, had faith to put a foreign army to flight! Samson the philander had faith to obtain God’s promises. In this greatest of all halls of heroes, their flaws are forgotten, their faith memorialized. If we want to have heroes, and the Bible seems to make it clear that we can and should, our only option is heroes who have sinned. And I believe we can laud those heroes for their faith, even while acknowledging their weaknesses. As one man has wisely noted, even the best of men are but men at their best. [Like on Facebook]( [Share on Google+]( [Pin it!](https%3a%2f%2fwww.challies.com%2fwp-content%2fuploads%2f2016%2f10%2f260x125_sidebar-ad.png) [Tweet This]( [Subscribe by email]( [Subscribe by RSS]( Related Stories - [What’s the Purpose of … the Church?]( - [Death to the One-Year Rule!]( - [A Day in the Mountains of Switzerland](   • [Email to a friend]( Hagiography, and Villainy;5790825) • [] [A La Carte (October 2)]( Today’s [Kindle deals]( include a whole collection of titles from John MacArthur. Christian Audio has an excellent freebie this month: [The Whole Christ]( by Sinclair Ferguson. You’ll find a few of his other books heavily discounted. [The First Tremor]( “More than three hundred years before Martin Luther was born, an unlikely reformer suddenly appeared in the city of Lyon in southeast France.” You ought to know about him. [Let’s Get Real About Women’s Discipleship]( This is a good one. “If Instagram is any clue, most Christian women think discipleship is limited to hosting thoughtfully curated Bible studies in tasteful homes where shrieking children and dirty dishes don’t exist. This glossy ideal sits like a yoke on many women’s shoulders rather than spurring them onward in Christ’s Great Commission.” [The Clay of Paganism with the Iron of Christianity]( Cornelius Van Til said it well: “Van Til argued that ‘Romanists mix a great deal of the clay of paganism with the iron of Christianity.’” [ACBC Conference Livestream]( The ACBC Conference is happening this week and streaming live. [Speaking Ill of Hugh Hefner]( This is an appropriately scathing article on the life and legacy of Hugh Hefner. “Hugh Hefner, gone to his reward at the age of 91, was a pornographer and chauvinist who got rich on masturbation, consumerism and the exploitation of women, aged into a leering grotesque in a captain’s hat, and died a pack rat in a decaying manse where porn blared during his pathetic orgies.” [7 Tips for Understanding Revelation]( ”Whether you find that intimidating or enticing, we need some guardrails to keep us from getting lost in Revelation’s prophecies, metaphors, and apocalyptic imagery. Here are some tips for studying Revelation from Scott Duvall…” [On Daughters and Dating: How to Intimidate Suitors]( Jen Wilkin on dads and daughters: “let’s talk frankly about what you need to do to guard her interests when it comes to dating. Instead of brandishing a shotgun or breaking out an application, you need to build a wall.” [Flashback: Persevere in PrayerÂ]( Satan knows he can undermine a church’s effectiveness by undermining a church’s prayer life. God is good not because he gives us answers but because he gives us himself. —Joni Eareckson Tada [Like on Facebook]( [Share on Google+]( [Pin it!](https%3a%2f%2fwww.challies.com%2fwp-content%2fuploads%2f2017%2f09%2fChalliesOcct1-7-01.png) [Tweet This]( [Subscribe by email]( [Subscribe by RSS]( Related Stories - [Weekend A La Carte (September 30)]( - [A La Carte (September 29)]( - [A La Carte (September 28)](   • [Email to a friend]( La Carte (October 2);5790825) • --------------------------------------------------------------- [Contact Us]( •[Past Issues](5790825/52189706/d62d44beb56668f6e06397b6487b7fed) •[Unsubscribe]( [Click here to safely unsubscribe]( from "challies.com - Informing the Reforming." [Click here to view mailing archives](, [here to change your preferences]( or [here to subscribe]( • [Privacy]( Email subscriptions powered by [FeedBlitz](), LLC, 365 Boston Post Rd, Suite 123, Sudbury, MA 01776, USA.

Marketing emails from feedblitz.com

View More
Sent On

24/10/2017

Sent On

23/10/2017

Sent On

22/10/2017

Sent On

21/10/2017

Sent On

20/10/2017

Sent On

19/10/2017

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.