And how it has resurged as an open-source project. [Read Online]( 3 reasons why Maybe failed ð And how it has resurged as an open-source project. [Nicolás Cerdeira]( [fb]( [tw]( [in]( [email](mailto:?subject=Post%20from%20Failory&body=3%20reasons%20why%20Maybe%20failed%20%F0%9F%92%80%3A%20And%20how%20it%20has%20resurged%20as%20an%20open-source%20project.%0A%0Ahttps%3A%2F%2Fnewsletter.failory.com%2Fp%2F3-reasons-maybe-failed) Hey â Itâs Nico. On Tuesday, I sent an email with a link to [2024 Failoryâs reader survey](. If you havenât filled it yet, itâd be amazing if you could take 3 minutes to do it. Between the people who complete the survey, Iâll be giving away 10 copies of my PMF eBook, 5 consultancy calls with me (30 min long), and 3 licenses of my Pre-Sell to Validate course. [Hereâs the link to the survey.]( Hereâs what I got today: - The reasons why Maybe failed, and how it has resurged ð - A puzzle where you have to identify which news is fake ð§© - An analysis of the unfortunate fate of Open Startups ð - Startup idea âGrander,â brought by On Deckâs founder ð¡ Presented by Athena [Athena]( The Secret to Success - Athena What do the founders of Product Hunt, Honey, OpenAI & 100s of others know that you donât? How to delegate. [They delegate with Athena](. Athena selects the top 1% of applicants, manages performance and continuously trains to keep you and your assistant on the cutting edge. As a member, you benefit from 100+ playbooks from other top performers from YC, a16z, Sequoia, Coinbase, Stripe, Airbnb, and many more. [Get a $1,500 credit on your first month â]( This Week In Startups ð Resources [7 actions to take]( if your startup is failing. [Y Combinator answers]( if technical founders need business co-founders. [CEO of Evisort shares]( some fundraising tips. [Hot takes on startup distribution]( and lessons on virality. ð° News Artifact, the news startup from Instagramâs founders, [is shutting down](. [US startup funding drops 30%]( in 2023 despite AI investments. [Finn raises $109M]( for its car subscription platform. UK insurance startup [Hyperexponential secures $73M](. ð® Cool Stuff The founder who crossed the Atlantic [donated his revenue]( for cleaning the ocean. [Amie created an amazing page]( recapping what they launched in 2023. [Startup Ratings is a new platform]( where employees review the startups they work for. Fail(St)ory [Maybe's story] From Raising $1M, to Shutdown, to Open Source Last Friday, [Josh Pigford tweeted](, âHere's what $1,000,000 worth of fintech software looks likeâ¦â followed by a link to a GitHub repo containing the code of his shutdown startup, Maybe. The tweet went viral, and the repo got trending. Josh took this chance [to reflect on Maybeâs failure]( and share why he thinks the project can be successful as an open-source project. What Was Maybe: Maybe was a âmodern financial planning & wealth management platform.â - Unlike other solutions in the space, they didnât charge management fees â they charged a monthly/annual subscription to access their suite of tools. - It was co-founded by Travis Woods and Josh Pigford. Travis is a CFP and CFA. Josh is an entrepreneur who previously founded Baremetrics, a B2B SaaS he sold for $4M. - Josh has a website where he displays [his past projects](. I love it cause itâs a perfect demonstration of Failoryâs mantra of failing to succeed. Backstory: - Maybe raised $1.45M from 1,300 investors in [a crowdfunding campaign on Republic](. - A team of 8 spent the following 18 months building the platform. When they launched, despite having a waiting list of 10,000+ people, only 50 became paying customers (with an average subscription price of $15/mo). - They reduced the team to 3 people and worked on improving the platform based on usersâ feedback. But they realized the economics of their model wouldnât work. - The decision: [They shut down Maybe]( and pivoted into building [Detangle](, a series of AI tools for understanding legal documents, using the funds they had left (~$240,000). Why Maybe Failed: In [a thread Josh published on Monday](, he explores three reasons why Maybe didnât make it. - Timing: Maybe surged in early 2021, along with the crypto and NFT boom. People were excited about being hands-on with their money, making fundraising easy. But when they launched, the market had crashed. The DIY approach to finances was now hard to sell. - Too much time developing: They spent 18 months to achieve something that just worked. Tools to which they integrated, like Plaid, promised a lot but didnât deliver. - Wrong focus: They spent a lot of time building the perfect product. They aimed to solve every edge user case, even though this didnât affect the majority of their users. Moreover, over the time they developed the platform, they didnât look much for user feedback â theyâd just make assumptions about what users needed and were willing to pay for. By the time they launched, they had a lot of burn and too much legacy code and processes to try to rework their product. The Future: Josh made Maybeâs code open-source as an experiment. The GitHub repo [quickly became trending](, and people [started contributing to the project](. Josh is optimistic that Maybe can now work because: - The overhead is almost zero. Only some infrastructure costs, but no wages. - Theyâve removed the human component, which removes the financial regulatory overhead (accounts used to have a certified financial advisor). - Personal finance app [Mint has shut down]( on January 1st. Thereâs a huge influx of demand (~4M users) for new solutions. - Maybeâs team is also building a set of B2B FinTech tools, so they have a new revenue source. Go Deeper: Read [Maybeâs shutdown announcement]( and [Josh Pigfordâs analysis of Maybeâs failure](. Puzzle Which News Is Fake? Three of these things happened this week. One did not. Can you guess the odd one out? - A unicorn [laid off a large part of its employees](. - A prominent tech CEO [announced plans to run for political office](. - A company [shut down a startup it acquired for $Bs](. - A well-known founder got into [controversy over the Palestine-Israel conflict](. Trend Radar [Open Startups] RIP Open Startups This weekend, I visited [Baremetrics Open Startups page]( after a while, looking for startups that were sharing their metrics openly. I immediately closed the tab with tears in my eyes. A look into Web Archive shows that the page used to feature 25-30 startups. It now only has 6. Then I checked [Open Startup List](. 30 startups, thatâs good! Then I checked their metrics page, and barely any were working. To me, itâs the end of an era. What Happened: - 3-5 years ago, if you were into Twitter, youâd know every startupâs revenue and main metrics. - Startups were transparent as a marketing strategy. - This has changed in recent years. Few founders are sharing their metrics openly. Why: [Danny Postma has recently tweeted]( about the reasons why he stopped sharing his revenue numbers. Then, many founders joined the conversation. The commonly mentioned reasons include: - Being open used to look like being candid. Now it looks like bragging. - Sharing metrics doesnât tell a businessâ full story. Thereâs way more besides the numbers. - Being transparent is a competitive disadvantage. Your competition knows your numbers â you donât know theirs. Plus, it attracts copycats. - Itâs unsafe from a personal perspective. There are lots of bad actors out there. Opportunity: Everything in life is a cycle. Now that no one is doing it, being an open startup might be a good marketing strategy once again. - Itâs good for growing an audience in social media. â[How to get 1k followers in 1 day: Say MRR 3 times.](â - If youâre selling to other founders, it can get you customers. - It helps to attract talent or [get acquisition offers](. Plus, itâs inspiring for others. My 15-year-old version was super motivated to start Failory because of other startups sharing their metrics openly. Go Deeper: Join the conversation on [Dannyâs tweet](, or see [what people say]( about sharing MRR numbers vs. not. Your Next Startup Fiverr for High-Value Tasks Erik Torenberg, co-founder of [On Deck]( and [Village Global](, [has tweeted a startup idea](. Idea: âGranderâ. Itâs like Fiverr, but for high-value tasks. Smart and talented people post their task offers; businesses pay $1,000+ to get these tasks done in 24 hours. Competition: - Fiverr has built this with [Fiverr Pro](, but I donât think the people and services offered there are of the standard Erik is thinking for âGrander.â - Some people in the comments mentioned [Catalant]( and [Replit Bounties]( (for dev work). - Some also mentioned Upwork, but it works differently. The business is the one that makes the job post, and the freelancers have to apply. Challenges: - This level of people Erik is thinking of prefers other working forms rather than the one proposed by Fiverr. They prefer to have longer-term clients. - Itâll be hard to motivate really talented people to join the platform. They probably have better ways to make money. - Fiverr works well because theyâre simple tasks. Outsourcing complex tasks is far more difficult and likely to fail. Refer Failory, Get Rewards Share Failory Chances are you have some more friends who would enjoy Failory as much as you do. Share Failory with these friends and cash in on premium resources and swag. You currently have 0 referrals, only 1 away from receiving the 2024 Startup Failure Report. [Share Failory â]( Or copy and paste this link to others: Help Me Improve Failory How Was Today's Newsletter? If this issue was a startup, how would you rate it? [ð Launches to the moon!](
[ð¤ Room for a pivot](
[ð Crashes and burns]( That's all of this week. Cheers, Nico Update your email preferences or unsubscribe [here]( © 2024 Failory 1309 Coffeen Avenue
Ste 1200, Sheridan, Wyoming 82801, United States of America [[beehiiv logo]Powered by beehiiv](