Newsletter Subject

Scaling To The Grave 🔥

From

failory.com

Email Address

nico@failory.com

Sent On

Thu, Aug 8, 2024 01:31 PM

Email Preheader Text

What Moxion Power teaches about the dangers of scaling to quickly.

What Moxion Power teaches about the dangers of scaling to quickly.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 [Read Online]( Scaling To The Grave What Moxion Power teaches about the dangers of scaling to quickly. [Nicolás Cerdeira]( [like]( [fb]( [fb]( [fb]( [fb](mailto:?subject=Post%20from%20Failory&body=Scaling%20To%20The%20Grave%3A%20What%20Moxion%20Power%20teaches%20about%20the%20dangers%20of%20scaling%20to%20quickly.%0A%0Ahttps%3A%2F%2Fnewsletter.failory.com%2Fp%2Fscaling-grave) In partnership with Hey — It’s Nico. Today’s issue takes 5 minutes to read. If you only have one, here are the five main things: - Moxion Power, a clean tech startup, shut down last week — read why below. - A list of [“software 3.0" ideas.]( - [Groq raises $640M]( to meet rising AI infrastructure demand. - [Judge declares Google]( as a Monopoly in US antitrust case. - Friend becomes one of the most bizarre product launches ever — read more below. Long time since I made this request: If you read today’s issue, can you give me your feedback by voting in the bottom poll? Also, if you feel kind today, please leave a comment after voting — I read them all 😄. Let’s get into it. Sidebar is the missing piece for your career. Have you ever tried to get a group of leaders like you together? It’s hard. Searching on LinkedIn, trying to meet people for coffee - it’s a headache. How can you uplevel your career and find your peer group when it’s so hard to do? Well, now there’s [Sidebar](. Sidebar takes the stress out of finding your people with perfect peer matching, expert facilitators, and more. It’s like your personal board of directors, there to help when you need it most. [Get Started]( This Week In Startups 🔗 Resources Differences between [building startups in boom vs gloom times](. A list of [“software 3.0" ideas.]( Ex-Uber Head of Product [shares scaling lessons](. How to improve the [growth mindset in your startup](. Understanding the [“build, measure, learn” method in startups](. 📰 News [Thrive Capital raises $5B]( across two funds to back early and late stage founders. Revolut tells staff [it’s launching $500M share sale](at $45B Valuation [Reddit acquires Memorable AI]( to boost advertiser performance. [Judge declares Google]( as a Monopoly in US antitrust case. OpenAI Co-founder [John Schulman joins rival Anthropic](. 💸 Fundraising [Groq raises $640M]( to meet rising AI infrastructure demand. [Bilt Rewards secures]( $150M to continue expansion plans. [Placer.ai]([raises $75M]( for business development and new features. YC-backed [Boostly raises $5.6M]( to boost restaurants with automated marketing. Fail(St)ory Rapid Expansion, Rapid Demise Last week, eco-friendly battery manufacturer [Moxion Power]( announced it was shutting down and laying off its last 248 employees. Two months ago, the company had already laid off a third of its workforce. Founded in 2020, Moxion Power aimed to revolutionize the market for temporary power solutions with its innovative, clean, mobile energy storage products. The company wanted to replace traditional, noisy, and polluting generators with their electric alternatives. Despite attracting substantial investment from major backers like Amazon and Microsoft and securing $110M in funding, Moxion could not obtain the additional financing required to endure the challenging clean tech industry. What Was It: Moxion Power developed mobile energy storage solutions for various sectors, including construction, transportation, events, film production, and telecommunications. Their mission was to aid industries that require temporary energy solutions and to provide a quieter and more environmentally friendly alternative to conventional generators. Moxion had ambitious plans to [construct a massive 200,000-square-foot]( factory at the Port of Richmond to scale production. Unfortunately, these grand plans contributed to their eventual failure. The Numbers: - 📅 Founded in 2020. - 💰 Raised $110M in funding over four years. - 🧑‍💼 At its peak, it had over 300 employees. - 🚀 In 2021, they went through Y Combinator. - 🔥 Burned through cash quickly, especially on infrastructure. Reasons For Failure: - Unviable Business Model: While the idea of replacing generators with clean batteries was promising, it proved difficult to implement. The high costs of their products made it challenging to compete unless regulations heavily favored them. This meant that their business model did not work in states without established regulations. - Ineffective Financial Management: Despite significant funding, Moxion struggled with managing its finances effectively. They invested heavily in building a large factory and scaling operations without a reliable, in-demand product, quickly depleting their cash reserves. - Overambitious Expansion: Moxion attempted to scale up too quickly, focusing on building a massive factory and increasing production before ensuring strong market demand. Many of the battery units they produced were not selling well, yet they continued to expand. - Economic Hurdles: The cost of Moxion’s units was significantly higher than traditional diesel generators. While their products were environmentally friendly, the economic benefits for customers were insufficient. Why It Matters: - Moxion Power is another example of the challenges that the CleanTech industry is facing. A month ago, I wrote about [Running Tide](, another CleanTech startup that had failed due to a lack of funding. - Sound business models and fiscal discipline are crucial. Careful management of finances and growth plans is essential for success. - Rapid scaling without a proven product is risky. Expanding too quickly can lead to significant financial difficulties. Trend A Successful Launch? Last week, Avi Schifmann launched [Friend](, an AI-powered necklace that is always listening and talks to you from time to time. The necklace is designed to act as an “imaginary friend” that understands your context, responds to what you’re doing, and reacts accordingly. [tw profile: Avi] Avi @AviSchiffmann [tw] introducing friend. not imaginary. order now at friend.com Friend no, I think you were vulnerable. there's a difference. 1:56 PM • Jul 30, 2024 12.9K Likes 1.13K Retweets 4.24K Replies The launch managed to get many people talking, although most of the chatter was negative. So, was this a successful launch? A Bold (and Costly) Move: When Avi Schifmann decided to launch [Friend.com](, he made a headline-grabbing choice by spending a whopping $1.8 million—75% of the company’s funding—on the domain name alone. This expenditure sparked immediate reactions, particularly on Twitter, where the decision was widely ridiculed. Many questioned whether this bold move was an indicator of genius or a sign of impending failure. In addition to this, The AI wearables space isn’t exactly known for its success stories. Just look at the recent [flop of the Humane Pin](. With that in mind, some are already predicting that Friend is headed for a similar fate. Critics have labeled the product as dystopian, sad, and ugly. Drama in the Developer World: As if the controversy surrounding the launch wasn’t enough, another developer, Nik Schevchenko, accused Schifmann of stealing his idea for Friend. How did he decide to handle this? By dropping a diss track on Twitter, of course. [tw profile: Nik Shevchenko] Nik Shevchenko @kodjima33 [tw] Congrats @AviSchiffmann for launching Friend 1:05 AM • Jul 31, 2024 3.89K Likes 199 Retweets 226 Replies The ensuing back-and-forth between the two developers escalated quickly, eventually leading to Schevchenko challenging Schifmann to a fight. [tw profile: Nik Shevchenko] Nik Shevchenko @kodjima33 [tw] Replying to@kodjima33 @MKBHD Many people suggested us to fight IM OFFICIALLY INVITING @AviSchiffmann TO FIGHT WITH ME DO YOU TAKE THE OFFER? 1:57 AM • Jul 31, 2024 482 Likes 10 Retweets 40 Replies While this drama might seem absurd, it undeniably added fuel to the fire, making Friend even more talked about. A Success: So, was the launch of [Friend.com]( a success? Well, that depends on how you define success. In terms of media coverage and public awareness, the launch certainly hit the mark, even if it was for all the wrong reasons. The product’s unique concept and Schifmann’s high-profile domain purchase generated significant media coverage. The bizarre dispute over who built Friend first only added fuel to the fire. The viral nature of the controversy has undoubtedly put Friend on the map, but whether this translates into a sustainable business is another matter entirely. Do you think this was a successful launch? [✅ If people talk about it, then it is a success.]( [❌ Not all publicity is good.]( Help Me Improve Failory How Was Today's Newsletter? If this issue was a startup, how would you rate it? [🚀 Launches to the moon!]( [🤔 Room for a pivot]( [💀 Crashes and burns]( That's all of this edition. Cheers, Nico Update your email preferences or unsubscribe [here]( © 2024 Failory 1309 Coffeen Avenue Ste 1200, Sheridan, Wyoming 82801, United States of America [[beehiiv logo]Powered by beehiiv]( [Terms of Service](

Marketing emails from failory.com

View More
Sent On

07/11/2024

Sent On

31/10/2024

Sent On

29/10/2024

Sent On

24/10/2024

Sent On

17/10/2024

Sent On

15/10/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.