Newsletter Subject

When 175 Employees Is Not Enough 🔥

From

failory.com

Email Address

nico@failory.com

Sent On

Thu, Jul 25, 2024 01:31 PM

Email Preheader Text

Aaqua, the social media app that never was.

Aaqua, the social media app that never was.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 [Read Online]( When 175 Employees Is Not Enough Aaqua, the social media app that never was. [Nicolás Cerdeira]( [like]( [fb]( [fb]( [fb]( [fb](mailto:?subject=Post%20from%20Failory&body=When%20175%20Employees%20Is%20Not%20Enough%3A%20Aaqua%2C%20the%20social%20media%20app%20that%20never%20was.%0A%0Ahttps%3A%2F%2Fnewsletter.failory.com%2Fp%2F175-employees-not-enough) Hey — It’s Nico. Today’s issue takes 5 minutes to read. If you only have one, here are the five main things: - A [FT report comes out]( sharing the story behind Aaqua’s failure and £100mn lawsuit — read more below. - A founder shares some lessons from [building a VC-backed startup](. - [Menlo Ventures and Anthropic launch]( a $100M AI fund. - [Fei-Fei Li builds a $1B startup]( in 4 months and raises $100M from A16z. - People are using Claude 3.5 Sonnet [to build 6-figure startups]( — learn more below. Let’s get into it. Presented by FundraisingOS Get Failory’s Fundraising OS for $97 $297 90% of startups fail because they run out of cash. Fundraising is hard and a challenge all founders face. This is why [I’ve built Fundraising OS](, which has everything you need to raise funding for your startup. This includes: - 5 lists of 3,500+ investors. - 7 tools for tracking and talking with investors. - 18 templates for different emails to investors. - 3 learning resources. And as a thank you for being a Failory subscriber, I’m giving you a 67% discount. [Buy It Now For $97 👉]( This Week In Startups 🔗 Resources Lessons from [building a VC-backed startup](. List of [accelerators you can apply for](. [12 strategic 'edges']( for startups. [Network effects]( for AI startups. Coatue’s views on the [state of the markets](. 📰 News AI startup [Cohere cuts staff]( after raising $500M. [Meta won’t release Llama AI]( in Europe over unpredictable regulations. [Wiz walks away from Google’s]( $23B acquisition offer. Indian ed-tech giant [Byju faces total shutdown](. [Menlo Ventures and Anthropic launch]( a $100M AI fund. 💸 Fundraising ['Godmother of AI' Fei-Fei Li builds a $1B startup in 4 months]( and raises $100M from A16z. [Legal tech firm Clio raises $900M](, plans expansion into AI and fintech offerings. [Posh raises $22M]( to personalize events and gatherings. 17-year-old Eric Zhu’s private market data startup [Aviato raises $2.3M](. Fail(St)ory 2 Years, No Product A few weeks ago, the Financial Times published an [excellent report]( on what happened to Aaqua, a startup that closed in 2022. The company, which promised a revolutionary approach to social media, ultimately never delivered on its grand vision. What Was Aaqua: Aaqua aimed to create a social media platform focused on communities built around shared passions. Unlike other social media giants that monetize user data through ads, Aaqua pledged to use data only to suggest relevant content tailored to users' interests. The fundamental concept of Aaqua was to develop a "circular economy" where content and interactions would be organically generated, driven by users' genuine interests instead of profit-driven algorithms. This vision, and the high salaries they offered quickly drew top talent from the leading tech companies. In a short time, Aaqua had over 175 employees. However, despite having the greatest talent and significant funding, Aaqua’s app was never launched. The Numbers: - 📅 Founded in 2020. - 💰 Raised substantial funding from investors, including Candy Ventures. - 🧑‍💼 At its peak, it had 175 employees. - 🔥 Burned $1M+ every month initially, escalating to around $4M per month by the end of 2021. - 📉 Never launched its app despite the significant investment and resources. Reasons For Failure: - Legal Troubles: Aaqua's founder, Robert Bonnier, made grand promises about the platform's potential, including false claims that Apple and LVMH were backing Aaqua. These claims were critical to securing investment from Candy Ventures. When Candy Ventures discovered that Apple had never intended to back Aaqua, they sued Bonnier, resulting in a freezing order that prevented Aaqua employees from being paid in July 2022. - Poor Leadership and Transparency: Leadership issues plagued Aaqua, with Bonnier's confrontational management style contributing to internal strife. According to the FT report, Bonnier once publicly and aggressively fired a key employee, stating: “As founder and CEO of Aaqua, I hereby fire you on the spot... I have no idea what you ever did for Aaqua.” - Financial Mismanagement: Aaqua was burning through cash at an unsustainable rate. Their large workforce meant they were spending millions per month just on salaries. This could have been acceptable if Aaqua had something to show for all this money, but in its two-year lifetime, they never released even a prototype of the app. - Lack of a Viable Product: Despite the grand vision and substantial funding, Aaqua never developed a market-ready product. The inability to launch an app meant the company could not generate revenue or validate its business model. Why It Matters: - Aaqua’s journey reflects the importance of transparency and realistic goal-setting in startups. - It is another example of the great difficulties of building a new social media app. - It highlights the importance of building an MVP before hiring hundreds of employees. Go Deeper: Check [Financial Times’s report](. Trend Coding with Sonnet A few weeks ago, [I talked about Anthropic's newest model](, Claude 3.5 Sonnet. This week, I noticed many people discussing how they're using Sonnet to quickly build software businesses. Surprisingly, many seem to prefer Sonnet over GPT for coding. Why It Matters: - Developers say Sonnet makes them 10 times more efficient. - People without coding experience have created complex projects (see examples below). - As AI improves, more people can build cool things without being expert programmers. Some Examples: - Pietro Schirano made [EverArt]( with the help of Sonnet. The app is now making $100K per month. [tw profile: Pietro Schirano] Pietro Schirano @skirano [tw] $100k monthly revenue in 9 months. First-time founder. Sonnet 3.5 changed everything. [tw profile: Garry Tan] Garry Tan @garrytan Underrated trend 7:12 PM • Jul 20, 2024 7.56K Likes 419 Retweets 86 Replies - The [Otto]( team wrote half their code using Sonnet. [tw profile: Sully] Sully @SullyOmarr [tw] 50% of our code base was written entirely by LLMs expect this to be ~80% by next year With sonnet we’re shipping so fast, it feels like we tripled headcount overnight Not using Claude 3.5 to code? Expect to be crushed by teams who do (us) [tw profile: Garry Tan] Garry Tan @garrytan Underrated trend 9:39 PM • Jul 20, 2024 3.47K Likes 289 Retweets 179 Replies - Riley Brown made a working note-taking app without coding experience. He just kept asking Claude questions until the app was finished. [tw profile: Riley Brown] Riley Brown @rileybrown_ai [tw] OMG!!!!! 6 Days Ago I had never written a line of code in my life. But I just deployed my first note taking web app with a back end that stores the data, using Claude, Replit, and Google Firebase. Just brute forced asked Claude questions alternating between 2 accounts to get… x.com/i/web/status/1… 7:57 AM • Jul 18, 2024 2.28K Likes 226 Retweets 83 Replies - Min Choi shared a list with [several other examples](. Why Sonnet: When Sonnet was released, I mentioned that benchmarks showed its coding abilities were better than Gemini, Llama, and even GPT-4. We know benchmarks don't always reflect how people actually use the model. But in this case, it seems these tests were right. Many developers say Sonnet is much better than GPT for coding. I'm not completely sure if this is true, but what I do find very useful are Sonnet's artifacts, which let the model run JavaScript code right in the chat. This has many uses, but one I find really interesting is this idea by Pietro Schirano. [tw profile: Pietro Schirano] Pietro Schirano @skirano [tw] One of my favorite new hacks has been asking Claude to create a detailed graph of my scripts using Artifacts and then pasting those results directly into the README of the repo. 6:04 PM • Jul 19, 2024 1.37K Likes 97 Retweets 24 Replies Have you used Sonnet to help you code? [✅ Sonnet is literally building my new startup!]( [❌ AI code is still unreliable...]( Help Me Improve Failory How Was Today's Newsletter? If this issue was a startup, how would you rate it? [🚀 Launches to the moon!]( [🤔 Room for a pivot]( [💀 Crashes and burns]( That's all of this edition. Cheers, Nico Update your email preferences or unsubscribe [here]( © 2024 Failory 1309 Coffeen Avenue Ste 1200, Sheridan, Wyoming 82801, United States of America [[beehiiv logo]Powered by beehiiv]( [Terms of Service](

Marketing emails from failory.com

View More
Sent On

07/11/2024

Sent On

31/10/2024

Sent On

29/10/2024

Sent On

24/10/2024

Sent On

17/10/2024

Sent On

15/10/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.