Newsletter Subject

URGENT re: dangerous food additives

From

ewg.org

Email Address

ewg@ewg.org

Sent On

Tue, Nov 7, 2023 02:05 PM

Email Preheader Text

A few days ago, the FDA released a proposal to REVOKE authorization of brominated vegetable oil from

A few days ago, the FDA released a proposal to REVOKE authorization of brominated vegetable oil (or BVO) from use in food. [EWG] [EWG] [BREAKING: The FDA moves to BAN brominated vegetable oil Should the FDA BAN other harmful food additives?]( [YES]( [NO]( Astonishing news, friend - A few days ago, the FDA released a proposal to REVOKE authorization of brominated vegetable oil (or BVO) from use in food. While this is great progress, the FDA has known for years about the health dangers of BVO. Because of the lack of national action, major beverage companies and the state of California have already stepped up to remove BVO from food and beverage products. Take a look at some of the other food additives California recently banned that are still present in hundreds of packaged foods and allowed by the FDA: • Red Dye No. 3, found in over 2,000 packaged foods, including snack cakes, candy and bacon bits. Red No. 3 has been linked to cancer and harm to children’s brains! • Potassium bromate, found in 130 products, including breads and store-bought cookies, and linked to cancer. • Propyl paraben, found in 52 products, including tortillas and dessert frosting, and linked to endocrine disruption and harm to the reproductive system. That’s just the tip of the iceberg. Europe has also banned these chemicals and more from nearly all processed foods, but the FDA hasn’t even reviewed some of them since the 1970s. If these additives are too dangerous to be used in California and the EU, why are they still being used nationwide? We need 5,000 of our top supporters from across the country to help us show food and beverage corporations that Americans don’t want toxic chemicals in their food. [Can we count on you to show your support by completing our quick survey by midnight tonight?]( [Should the FDA BAN harmful food additives?]( [YES]( [NO]( – EWG Research Team [DONATE NOW]( KNOW YOUR ENVIRONMENT. PROTECT YOUR HEALTH. [UNSUBSCRIBE]( | [CHANGE OPTIONS]( Remember to add ewg@ewg.org to your contact list. This email was sent to {EMAIL}. To change your preferred email address, [click here.]( EWG's mission is to empower people to live healthier lives in a healthier environment. EWG is a non-profit and non-partisan organization. The EWG Action Fund, a separate sister organization ofEWG, is a legislative advocacy organization that promotes healthy and sustainable policies. EWG 1250 I Street, NW, Suite 1000, Washington, DC 20005 202-667-6982 | ewg@ewg.org [Contact Us]( | [Privacy Policy]( | [Terms & Conditions]( | Copyright © 2023, EWG. All Rights Reserved.

Marketing emails from ewg.org

View More
Sent On

23/02/2024

Sent On

22/02/2024

Sent On

20/02/2024

Sent On

19/02/2024

Sent On

18/02/2024

Sent On

16/02/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.