Newsletter Subject

Flat earth and space juice

From

everydayspy.com

Email Address

everydayspy@email.everydayspy.com

Sent On

Tue, Apr 30, 2024 01:00 PM

Email Preheader Text

“Nobody can prove we landed on the moon – it could have been a movie set. They had those b

“Nobody can prove we landed on the moon – it could have been a movie set. They had those back then, you know.” [Image](https://) Greetings Everyday Spy, My 4th of July celebration a few years ago with new friends in Maine turned into an awkward conspiracy conversation just after lunch. To be fair, the conversation wasn’t with me – it was between my son, Sina (8 years old at the time) and our friend’s son (12 years old). The two boys are both homeschooled, both kind and polite, and both exceptional readers with awesome imaginations. I was sitting with the two boys when Sina said that he was excited about our next big trip overseas. His friend told us to be careful that we don’t fall off the edge of the Earth. Sina and I both laughed, thinking it was a joke… but the boy’s face showed us he was quite serious. “Because the Earth is flat, you know. Some people think it’s round, but they’ve never proven that. And if it were round, people would be standing upside down on the other side of the planet.” My first thought was that the boy had his science mixed up – maybe he hadn’t started studying gravity yet in his home school studies. But Sina spoke faster than I did – and without a sense of social courtesy. “The Earth is round, dude,” he said. “Don’t you know that?” “The Earth is flat – you can’t prove it’s round,” the boy responded matter-of-factly. “And it's impossible to go into space because space is a liquid.” My son knew his friend was older than he by 4 years, but didn’t realize his friend was being serious. He laughed out loud again saying, “You’re crazy! Space is a vacuum, and we already had people visit the moon and travel around space, and we want to go to Mars!” “Nobody can prove we landed on the moon – it could have been a movie set. They had those back then, you know.” That was when it dawned on me our new friends were a family of conspiracy theorists. Or rather, the man-of-the-house was the conspiracy type and this boy was his parrot… I gave Sina a short squeeze on the left shoulder (our signal to, ‘let me take over – something may be dangerous’). I backed us out of the conversation by saying that the boy was asking good questions, and that proof was very important in science. Then I steered both boys into playing with Matchbox cars while I told my wife that it was time for us to get home, so the kids could recharge. 8 minutes later, we were saying cordial goodbyes and headed back to our summer rental home. Sina asked why his friend didn’t understand space, gravity, and the shape of the Earth. And I told him that he was learning from his dad, who may not have learned correctly when he was a kid. And for now, that answer was good enough for Sina… for now. [When you find yourself face-to-face with people who have strong beliefs contrary to your own, never challenge their opinions directly.]( If you do, you will trigger a cognitive defense mechanism that makes them dig deeper into their beliefs. While conflict and debate may be something you enjoy… That enjoyment rarely extends to others who will likely see your questions as accusations, judgement, and aggression. Instead, use the new information as a data point to help shape the way you engage that person in the future. Show your interest in their point-of-view, ask non-threatening questions, and put yourself in intel-gathering mode rather than teacher/fixer-mode. When you do, you will be better able to determine if what you are seeing is dangerous ideology, or simply innocent ignorance. And you will have every advantage over them in case they prove to be more of the first than the second. Godspeed, #EverydaySpy P.S. - [Beat conspiracy theories, media lies, and more with the same training every pro intel analyst gets with the Analyst Action Kit.]( Follow @EverydaySpy on Social Media! [Facebook]( [Twitter]( [LinkedIn]( [YouTube]( [Instagram]( Andrew Bustamante, Founder of EverydaySpy.com, is a former covert CIA Intelligence officer, decorated US Air Force Combat Veteran, and respected Fortune 500 senior advisor. Learn more from Andrew on his Podcast (The Everyday Espionage Podcast) and by following @EverydaySpy on your favorite social media platform. This email was sent to {EMAIL}. Don't want to receive these emails anymore? [Unsubscribe]( EverydaySpy, 411 Walnut St. #20309, Green Cove Springs, FL 32043

Marketing emails from everydayspy.com

View More
Sent On

13/05/2024

Sent On

13/05/2024

Sent On

13/05/2024

Sent On

13/05/2024

Sent On

13/05/2024

Sent On

13/05/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.