Newsletter Subject

1 ETF Set To Lose Its Crown

From

etfdailynews.com

Email Address

contact@etfdailynews.com

Sent On

Fri, Aug 5, 2022 04:17 PM

Email Preheader Text

August 5th, 2022 SPONSORED AD Lithium may have grabbed the headlines as a key material in building e

[ETF Daily News]( August 5th, 2022 SPONSORED AD [Far Beyond EVs]( Lithium may have grabbed the headlines as a key material in building electric vehicles (EVs). But so is copper. And copper's importance in the new green economy goes far beyond EVs. Copper is critical in building wind turbines and solar panels. It's key to power lines and upgrading the national grid. Analysts say we're facing a 10-million-ton shortfall if new copper mines are not found. [See How You Can Benefit From New Copper Discoveries.]( [1 ETF Set To Lose Its Crown]( Since 2017, the King of the Exchange Traded Fund world has slowly been losing ground to its closest competitors. The [SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY)]( the undisputed ETF King since ETFs became popular, is set to lose its crown within the next few years. Well, perhaps it would be better to say that it will lose one of its crowns or maybe one of its world titles while still holding a few others. Let me explain… The SPY ETF is and has been, with the exception of just a handful of months over the last 20-plus years, the largest Exchange Traded Fund in terms of assets under management. Currently, SPY has $365 billion under management. In contrast, the next closest competitor, [iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV)]( has $298 billion, and then there is the [Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO)]( at $264 billion in assets. [Start Your Free Options Boot Camp with Trader Travis]( The SPDR ETF has more than $65 billion in assets compared to the second largest ETF and more than $100 billion compared to the third largest ETF. So why are there predictions that its competitors will overtake it in the coming years? First and foremost, since 2017, it has been losing ground to IVV and VOO, and based on results from the first half of 2022, the trend doesn’t appear to be changing. VOO has added $29.2 billion in assets year-to-date, while IVV has added $15.7 billion. On the other hand, SPY has lost $22.7 billion. Also, it is essential to remember that these three ETFs we are comparing all due literally the same thing, track the S&P 500’s performance. It is not as if we are comparing a NASDAQ-focused ETF and a S&P 500 ETF, these three funds are all built the same. They own the 500 stocks that make up the S&P 500 based on a market capitalization weighting. That matters because this shows that the three fund’s asset changes are not based on performance but on investor preference showing that they are pulling money from one fund in mass and adding it to the others. Why is this shift occurring? Simple! Cost. Despite being the undisputed King of the ETF world, the SPY has one chink in its amour; it is expensive compared to the competition. Like really expensive. The SPY charges a 0.09% expense ratio. So in dollar terms, that would mean an investor with $10,000 in SPY pays $9.00 per year. But IVV and VOO only charge 0.03% or $3.00 for every $10,000 invested. SPY is three times as expensive as the competition, which offers a nearly identical product. It makes no sense for long-term buy-and-hold investors to stick with SPY and pay the higher fee. As for other types of investors, say those who trade or put on hedged positions or different complicated investing strategies, it does still make sense why they would use SPY instead of the alternatives. SPY still has the best liquidity. [Free Mini Options Boot Camp – Click Here!]( The current average daily volume for SPY is 93 million shares trading hands per day. IVV’s average volume is 6.2 million, and VOO’s is 5.6 million. Even these figures back the thesis that long-term buy-and-hold investors are buying… Continue reading at [INO.com]( SPONSORED AD [Privacy Policy]( | [Advertiser Disclosure]( Copyright © 2022 Mesh Publishing | All Rights Reserved [Unsubscribe]( [Privacy Policy]( [Terms & Conditions]( 146 W 29th St, Rm 8E, New York, NY 10001

Marketing emails from etfdailynews.com

View More
Sent On

29/02/2024

Sent On

27/02/2024

Sent On

23/02/2024

Sent On

21/02/2024

Sent On

19/02/2024

Sent On

15/02/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.