Newsletter Subject

Biden’s EPA Calls Cancer-Causing Plastic Waste a “Biofuel”

From

energyandcapital.com

Email Address

newsletter@energyandcapital.com

Sent On

Wed, Mar 15, 2023 06:08 PM

Email Preheader Text

There’s nothing more frustrating than government red tape holding back legislation that can hel

There’s nothing more frustrating than government red tape holding back legislation that can help people — but what comes after the regulations are clawed back can often be much worse. [Energy and Capital Header] Practical Investment Analysis for the New Energy Economy Biden’s EPA Calls Cancer-Causing Plastic Waste a “Biofuel” Luke Sweeney | Mar 15, 2023 There’s nothing more frustrating than government red tape holding back legislation that can help people. But what comes after the regulations are clawed back can often be much worse. Thanks to some unacceptably lax changes to the EPA’s Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) program, oil giant Chevron was recently given the green light for more than 30 “biofuels.” The only problem? Most of the approved fuels are neither renewable nor biological. In fact, nearly half of the proposed chemicals are confirmed to be made from highly toxic plastic waste. The rest have been kept secret from the public — they could be made from spent plutonium for all we know. According to the EPA’s own data, these chemicals also pose a truly unbelievable cancer risk. The previous regulation set a safety baseline of one case of cancer per million exposures. This new fuel is projected to potentially cause cancer in 1 out of every 4 workers who handle it frequently. Think about that for a minute. The EPA has suddenly decided to accept a risk that is 250,000 times greater than its previous standard. I’m not usually one to rely on the government for answers, but a little bit of red tape would be great right now. The Biggest Event in Our Company’s History For a limited time, we’re reopening access to the most popular presentation we’ve ever produced. Hosted by biotech expert Keith Kohl, this [urgent presentation]( shows you how to capture your slice of the $1.6 trillion global pharmaceutical market... And how to set yourself up for huge potential profits every single month as the FDA approves an unprecedented amount of new drugs. Over 10,000 people have viewed [the presentation]([...]( and we may have to take it down again soon... But as of right now, you can still get access. [Click here to tune in NOW.]( How Did We Get Here? Who's to Blame? Like every nicely paved road to hell, [this situation was created with the best intentions](. The Biden administration’s never-ending crusade against fossil fuels birthed this awkwardly written piece of legislation to help streamline the approval process for renewable fuel. Of course, by “streamline” I mean “water down the meaning and render useless.”  The language was carefully changed to prioritize “substitutes to petroleum-based fuels and fuel additives that use bio-based or waste-derived sources to produce biofuels.” The statement itself is contradictory — just because something is renewable does NOT make it a biofuel. But according to these new guidelines, even jet fuel made from toxic plastic byproducts qualifies as “green” fuel. It’s a problem that points to a much larger flaw with Biden’s liberal agenda. Even when he stumbles on to a good idea like promoting green energy, poor execution leads to disaster. Given half a chance, any company involved in petroleum-based products will continue to protect its investment. It’s not the oil industry’s job to determine how much cancer is too much. Chevron saw a loophole to turn its plastic waste into a profitable product and ran with it. After all, it’s a business designed to maximize profits, not a team of social workers. If Biden genuinely cared about the environment instead of just using it as a flag to wave at his voters, he would drop the hammer on these foul excuses for green fuel — especially considering we’ve already found some better alternatives. Biden’s Spending “Blitz” Set to Launch $5 EV Firm Over $9 billion in federal cash is set to rain down on one overlooked sector of the EV market... And this flood of government capital could send one $5 stock soaring in short order. This could be the biggest EV story of our lifetime. [Learn about the shocking EV company nobody’s talking about.]( Invest in the Ultimate Green Fuel — No Caveats I should start by mentioning that the REAL green fuel of the future poses zero cancer risks. I didn’t think I’d actually have to mention that, but here we are. It’s a simple compound that humans have been using for decades without any major catastrophes. No Hindenburgs, Chernobyls, or massive surges in cancer have been left in its wake. When burned, this green fuel releases plain nitrogen and water — plus a huge amount of energy. And thanks to a very recent advance in generation technology, it can be made using renewable electricity with a machine the size of a small refrigerator. That means it could work in the heart of a major city or in a remote field connected to solar panels. Major shipping vessels could theoretically house a mobile power plant and stay at sea indefinitely. It’s no exaggeration to say that this fuel is where the REAL money is. If Chevron wasn't already sitting on a cheap source of plastic waste, its cancer-causing fuel would never see the light of day. [The tiny companies behind this tech are currently trading at incredibly undervalued prices.]( I can’t say for sure how long they can stay in stealth mode once this news breaks. [Access our free research presentation here for details.]( To your wealth, Luke Sweeney Contributor, Energy and Capital [[follow basic]Check us out on YouTube!]( Luke’s technical know-how combined with an insatiable scientific curiosity has helped uncover some of our most promising leads in the tech sector. He has a knack for breaking down complicated scientific concepts into an easy-to-digest format, while still keeping a sharp focus on the core information. His role at Angel is simple: transform piles of obscure data into profitable investment leads. When following our recommendations, rest assured that a truly exhaustive amount of research goes on behind the scenes.. [Fb]( [Li]( [Tw]( This email was sent to {EMAIL}. You can manage your subscription and get our privacy policy [here](. Energy and Capital, Copyright © 3 East Read Street, Baltimore, MD 21202. Please note: It is not our intention to send email to anyone who doesn't want it. If you're not sure why you're getting this e-letter, or no longer wish to receive it, get more info [here]( including our privacy policy and information on how to manage your subscription. If you are interested in our other publications, please call our customer service team at [1-877-303-4529](tel:/18773034529).

Marketing emails from energyandcapital.com

View More
Sent On

30/05/2024

Sent On

29/05/2024

Sent On

29/05/2024

Sent On

29/05/2024

Sent On

28/05/2024

Sent On

28/05/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.