Newsletter Subject

The “Fallout” From Three Mile Island Is Still Spreading

From

energyandcapital.com

Email Address

newsletter@energyandcapital.com

Sent On

Mon, May 9, 2022 03:17 PM

Email Preheader Text

In most cases, the incident is referred to as the “Three Mile Island disaster.” It birthed

In most cases, the incident is referred to as the “Three Mile Island disaster.” It birthed the long-standing public fear of nuclear energy that still lingers today. In most cases, the incident is referred to as the “Three Mile Island disaster.” It birthed the long-standing public fear of nuclear energy that still lingers today. [Energy and Capital logo] The “Fallout” From Three Mile Island Is Still Spreading [Luke Sweeney Photo] By [Luke Sweeney]( Written May 09, 2022 America’s worst nuclear accident on record occurred at 4:00 a.m. on March 28, 1979. Deep within the labyrinth of piping and control mechanisms, a single malfunctioning valve failed to close — without notifying the control room. Thinking everything was fine, operators carried on as usual. By the time shrieking alarm bells warned of rising core temperatures, it was already too late. [1] The reactor suffered a partial meltdown, damaging the core and releasing a tiny amount of exhaust gases. The anti-nuclear media firestorm began almost immediately afterward. In most cases, the incident is referred to as the “Three Mile Island disaster.” It birthed the long-standing public fear of nuclear energy that still lingers today. Nowadays, the accident is usually mentioned alongside other large-scale meltdowns like Chernobyl or Fukushima — both of which are actually worthy of being called “disasters." In 1986, the nuclear reactor in Chernobyl, Ukraine, suffered a catastrophic meltdown, spewing nuclear material miles into the air and releasing a shock wave of radiation that was detected on far corners of the planet. Thirty-one people were killed, hundreds more suffered intense radiation poisoning, and some areas of Ukraine are still uninhabitable almost 40 years later. That’s what a real nuclear disaster looks like. “Lithium Crunch” Ahead: Buy THIS Stock Our exploding battery demand is causing a giant lithium crisis. According to the International Energy Agency, current lithium production will have to increase by 50x in the coming years... But one little-known company has figured out how to make high-performance batteries that require NO lithium whatsoever. This [patented technology]( was developed in cooperation with the University of Queensland and is starting to roll out as we speak. [Check out my free report on this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity.]( In 2011, in Fukushima, Japan, a massive 9.0-magnitude earthquake forced engineers to start an emergency shutdown of the reactors. The facility was successfully brought offline, but a sudden loss of power knocked out the critically important heat pumps. Temperatures started to climb until the concrete reactor shields themselves actually melted, spewing huge amounts of radiation into the nearby ocean. After a decade of round-the-clock work, the reactor is still releasing millions of tons of radioactive waste into the water. These events are true nuclear disasters — there’s no denying that. But the two worst accidents in the industry’s history had nothing to do with nuclear power itself. Chernobyl was the direct result of Soviet Union hubris. The facility was incredibly outdated, poorly organized, and under enormous pressure to become the crown jewel of the empire. With competent leadership and modern technology, the Chernobyl disaster could have been avoided and simply been another Saturday. Fukushima was built according to modern standards, and the Japanese government is more than competent enough to run it properly. But there was one fatal flaw: building a nuclear reactor next to the ocean in a country famous for its tsunamis — and on a fault line, no less. Engineers claimed that the facility could handle everything the country’s weather could throw at it. Unfortunately for the 50,000 civilians forced to evacuate their homes, that was a costly mistake. New Battery Is Quickly Transforming a $3.3 Trillion Market The "Newton Battery" is ushering in a new era in power storage. Using just gravity, it powers the grid better than any other battery on the market. The Newton Battery is cheaper to produce because it's only made of steel and concrete — and it poses no threat of fire or explosion. In short, it’s THE best solution to the world’s energy storage problem. And it’s a huge opportunity that spells colossal new wealth for early investors. The best part is that the mastermind company behind the Newton Battery just went public... [Be one of the first to see all the details.]( The Death Toll of Three Mile Island Will Definitely Shock You Thanks to the operators' quick thinking, Three Mile Island was practically over before it started. The end result? A few cubic feet of harmless gas, zero injuries, and not a single particle of radiation released into the atmosphere. If that surprises you, you're not alone. Considering how much hype the Three Mile Island incident gets, I expected at least a double-digit death toll. But even seven years before Chernobyl, top-notch engineering and management successfully prevented a major disaster. So if engineers could reliably prevent a malfunction from escalating to a catastrophe back in 1979, why isn't there a nuclear reactor on every street corner today in 2022? We have the tools to render fossil fuels, as well as most renewables, completely obsolete — especially in America, where engineering talent is abundant and tsunami risk is notoriously low. Strange Tech Will Kick-Start the 4th Industrial Revolution [twa electric glass finger]Take a look at this tiny little chip. It might be small, but according to PwC, this chip will soon kick-start "the fourth industrial revolution." And if you position yourself right, I expect you could have the chance to turn every $500 into exceptional gains of up to $131,600. [Click here to see the details of this historic opportunity.]( Unfortunately, the world’s political system is rife with nuclear naysayers. Most of them either have oil donor money in their pockets or simply fear what they don't understand. Personally, I think having anti-progress viewpoints should disqualify you from politics altogether. We can’t just ban nuclear reactors at the first sign of trouble — we have to make them better. To really get the skittish public on board with nuclear, we need to eliminate all of the safety concerns, not just the big scary ones. The world doesn't want empty promises — it wants a guarantee. So far, the best way to do that is simple: Completely redefine everything we know about nuclear reactors. Take the image below, for example. [This new nuclear fuel is the closest thing to a safe guarantee that the industry has ever seen.]( Its bizarre design resembles something out of a science-fiction movie. [2] [Angel Publishing’s senior tech analyst Keith Kohl managed to cover this tech months before it went viral. Check out his free presentation here for an in-depth breakdown.]( To your wealth, Luke Sweeney Contributor, Energy and Capital Luke’s technical know-how combined with an insatiable scientific curiosity has helped uncover some of our most promising leads in the tech sector. He has a knack for breaking down complicated scientific concepts into an easy-to-digest format, while still keeping a sharp focus on the core information. His role at Angel is simple: transform piles of obscure data into profitable investment leads. When following our recommendations, rest assured that a truly exhaustive amount of research goes on behind the scenes.. Browse Our Archives [Making the Internet Great Again]( [Is Charlie Munger a Communist Sympathizer?]( [Did You Buy the Wrong FANG?]( [What Do They Hate Now?]( [For Once, Musk Is Years Behind His Competition]( --------------------------------------------------------------- This email was sent to {EMAIL}. It is not our intention to send email to anyone who doesn't want it. If you're not sure why you've received this e-letter, or no longer wish to receive it, you may [unsubscribe here]( and view our privacy policy and information on how to manage your subscription. To ensure that you receive future issues of Energy and Capital, please add newsletter@energyandcapital.com to your address book or whitelist within your spam settings. For customer service questions or issues, please contact us for assistance. Energy and Capital, Copyright © 2022, Angel Publishing LLC. All rights reserved. 3 E Read Street, Baltimore, MD 21202. Your privacy is important to us – we will never rent or sell your e-mail or personal information. Please read our [Privacy Policy](. Neither the publisher nor the editors are registered investment advisors. Subscribers should not view this publication as offering personalized legal or investment advice. Read our [Details and Disclosures.]( ---------------------------------------------------------------

Marketing emails from energyandcapital.com

View More
Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

04/12/2024

Sent On

04/12/2024

Sent On

02/12/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.