Looking for the Next GameStop?

It's clear that narratives are partly driving the GameStop saga. But there is something more than narratives driving the mania... something less obvious. Why did the r/WallStreetBets subreddit choose GameStop as the first target for its short squeeze? It's clear that narratives are partly driving the GameStop saga. But there is something more than narratives driving the mania... something less obvious. Why did the r/WallStreetBets subreddit choose GameStop as the first target for its short squeeze? [Energy and Capital logo] Looking for the Next GameStop? [Luke Burgess Photo] By [Luke Burgess]( Written Feb 01, 2021 There are many narratives amid the GameStop (NYSE: GME) drama. Among them are narratives concerning the role of short sellers in the market. One narrative portrays short sellers as cold scavengers, always betting on companies to fail, and costing good old-fashioned hardworking Americans their jobs. Another narrative paints short sellers as a vital market function, separating the financially weak from the financially strong, and ultimately making the market stronger and more stable in the long run. The most perverse narrative in the whole affair, however, is one of “us versus them” — a David and Goliath story where the underdog is the victor. And the underdog in that narrative is Main Street... the everyman retail investor... the 99%. It's the same BS narrative that rallied the Occupy Wall Street movement and got Trump elected: The financial and political elite are actively oppressing you, so you have a duty (and a right) to stand up against them. Of course, that's not necessarily the case. The only investors who really benefited were those who owned GME prior to the short squeeze. And they just got lucky the Reddit community chose GameStop as its target for the short squeeze. R/WallStreetBets could have chosen any number of companies to target with a high short interest. Did This $3 Firm Just Make Tesla Obsolete? There will be 12 million electric cars on the road in five years. And believe it or not, [THIS]( strange liquid could power every single one. [gcs nene liquid]( Don't believe it? See the proof for yourself... [Click here.]( There was a story over the weekend about a 10-year-old boy who made “big bucks” from the GameStop squeeze. The New York Times reports... [jkkgd] Cute, right? And if you were trying to champion some narrative that the GameStop short squeeze was a win for the common man, this is a story you'd point to as a success. But read past the headline and you'll learn that the boy's mother bought him the stock way back in December 2019. Buying the stock had nothing to do with the r/WallStreetBets plan to short squeeze the stock. The truth is this kid's success (not unlike most others, by the way) was just a fluke. Boooo! Boooooooooo! Yeah, I know. You can't criticize any success in a child's life without facing criticism yourself, right? Well, that's the whole point in reporting the story in this way... You wouldn't be booing me if the person in The New York Times story were a 47-year-old father of three who worked for the IRS. Truth is, this kid was just one of thousands of people who owned the stock prior to the short squeeze. It's great that he got lucky. But The New York Times is very clearly trying to appeal to the “us versus them” mentality with this one. It's clear that narratives are partly driving the GameStop saga. In an interview with Yahoo last week, Jamie Catherwood, a client portfolio associate with O’Shaughnessy Asset Management, said: Yeah, I think to me this is, like, all kind of just a microcosm of a market that is being driven more by narrative than fundamentals. And I think we've seen this play out in a variety of ways, whether it's the rise of ESG [or], I think, like, the Capitol riots. But there is something more than narratives driving the mania... something less obvious. Why did the r/WallStreetBets subreddit choose GameStop as the first target for its short squeeze? Obviously, firms with high short interest have been the targets. And GameStop had a very high short position — as did other companies the subreddit focused on after GameStop. But r/WallStreetBets didn't simply go down the list of most heavily shorted stocks. Instead, it seemed to cherry-pick companies it liked from that list. What I'm getting at is there seem to be other factors, more than a company's short position, that play a role in r/WallStreetBets targeting it. Executive Order to Trigger Trillion-Dollar Boom President Trump launched an off-the-radar 5G project back in May 2020 when he signed Executive Order 13920. Investors who understand what this is about could make 7,899% on their money. Even the Democrats are behind it, with some pushing for even faster implementation. It’s no wonder... This once-in-a-century project is vital for our national defense, critical emergency services, and the economy. It’s expected to be as big as $1.5 trillion. And one tiny $8 stock will be the driving force making it all possible. For a limited time, you can get my full analysis on this opportunity free. [Click here to read it now.]( Consider, for a moment, the specific companies that are being targeted for short squeezes after GameStop. Those companies include AMC, BlackBerry, Nokia, and even Blockbuster. Even Dogecoin, a cryptocurrency intended as a joke, and now silver have also been swept up in the action. When I look at the companies being targeted by r/WallStreetBets, I see a common thread. At least a few other people have noticed this thread as well. They've mostly described it as “nostalgia.” TIME reports: Nostalgia, and its defense, may also play a very big role in the financial activism. Feeling targeted by predatory short sellers like Melvin Capital, Reddit users are trying to make them literally pay. And as of Wednesday, Reddit investment rallies have been formed to prop up AMC Theaters and the ghost of video rental stores Blockbuster. Yet while I do think nostalgia does play a partial role in which stocks are targeted for short squeezes, I still think there's more to it. That's because not all targets are things people could be nostalgic about. No one is nostalgic over Dogecoin. And it's unlikely Redditors are nostalgic over silver. So I think there's more to it. Another firm with a very large short interest is Virgin Galactic (NYSE: SPCE). Shares of SPCE have run up on speculation of a short squeeze. But a squeeze hasn't happened. There are similar stories with FuboTV (NYSE: FUBO) and Ligand Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ: LGND). Both have among the largest short interests on the market and mere speculation of short squeezes have moved prices somewhat higher. So why does the r/WallStreetBets choose to target AMC over Ligand Pharmaceuticals? Why favor Blockbuster over FuboTV? Well, like I said, I think it simply boils down to some businesses or assets being preferred over others. The most common Reddit users are ages 25–29. One in four Reddit users fall into this age range. That is the prime age range for interest in video games, movie theater attendance, and the target audience for assets like Dogecoin. What I'm getting at is I think it would have been highly unlikely the r/WallStreetBets subreddit would have chosen a deeply unpopular company to squeeze despite the company's high short interest. If Comcast had an extremely high short interest, would Redditors want to pump up its stock? Which do they hate more? Comcast or short sellers? Or what if one of the major banks like Wells Fargo or BOA had a high short interest? Would Redditors go out of their way to pump up its stock? I don't think they would. So it's not just companies that have a high short interest that have become targets. To be an r/WallStreetBets target for a short squeeze, a company must have a high short interest and there must be something about it that appeals to the liking of the r/WallStreetBets community... something that appeals to the 25–29 age range. Until next time, [Luke Burgess Signature] Luke Burgess As an editor at Energy and Capital, Luke’s analysis and market research reach hundreds of thousands of investors every day. Luke is also a contributing editor of Angel Publishing’s Bull and Bust Report newsletter. There, he helps investors in leveraging the future supply-demand imbalance that he believes could be key to a cyclical upswing in the hard asset markets. For more on Luke, go to his [editor’s page](. Browse Our Archives [3 Takeaways From the GME Army's Short Squeeze on Wall Street]( [The Greatest Short Squeeze Ever Occurred in 1922]( [How President Biden Is Single-Handedly Saving the Oil Industry]( [Check out These Blank-Check Companies]( [This Precious Metal Just Hit $20,000 an Ounce]( --------------------------------------------------------------- This email was sent to {EMAIL}. It is not our intention to send email to anyone who doesn't want it. If you're not sure why you've received this e-letter, or no longer wish to receive it, you may [unsubscribe here](, and view our privacy policy and information on how to manage your subscription. To ensure that you receive future issues of Energy and Capital, please add newsletter@energyandcapital.com to your address book or whitelist within your spam settings. For customer service questions or issues, please contact us for assistance. [Energy and Capital](, Copyright © 2021, [Angel Publishing LLC](. All rights reserved. 3 E Read Street, Baltimore, MD 21202. The content of this site may not be redistributed without the express written consent of Angel Publishing. Individual editorials, articles and essays appearing on this site may be republished, but only with full attribution of both the author and Energy and Capital as well as a link to www.energyandcapital.com. Your privacy is important to us -- we will never rent or sell your e-mail or personal information. Please read our [Privacy Policy](. No statement or expression of opinion, or any other matter herein, directly or indirectly, is an offer or the solicitation of an offer to buy or sell the securities or financial instruments mentioned. While we believe the sources of information to be reliable, we in no way represent or guarantee the accuracy of the statements made herein. [Energy and Capital]( does not provide individual investment counseling, act as an investment advisor, or individually advocate the purchase or sale of any security or investment. The publisher, editors and consultants of Angel Publishing may actively trade in the investments discussed in this publication. They may have substantial positions in the securities recommended and may increase or decrease such positions without notice. Neither the publisher nor the editors are registered investment advisors. Subscribers should not view this publication as offering personalized legal or investment counseling. Investments recommended in this publication should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company in question. ---------------------------------------------------------------