Newsletter Subject

These EV Stocks Are Better than Tesla

From

energyandcapital.com

Email Address

newsletter@energyandcapital.com

Sent On

Sun, Oct 11, 2020 07:44 PM

Email Preheader Text

As EV automakers cool off, investors should look for enabling technologies of electrification. Edito

As EV automakers cool off, investors should look for enabling technologies of electrification. Editor Jason Stutman discusses some “pick-and-shovel” plays for the electric vehicle industry... As EV automakers cool off, investors should look for enabling technologies of electrification. Editor Jason Stutman discusses some “pick and shovel” plays for the electric vehicle industry... [Energy and Capital logo] These EV Stocks Are Better than Tesla By Jason Stutman Written Oct 11, 2020 As far as technology investors are concerned, the biggest thing happening in the stock market this year has, without a doubt, been the explosion in interest in electric vehicles. Tesla, Inc. (NASDAQ: TSLA) is obviously the standout story. The company has managed to eclipse the valuation of every other automobile company in the world, despite accounting for a small fraction of global car sales. As I write, the company is valued at ~$402 billion, more than Toyota (NYSE: TM), General Motors (NYSE: GM), and Ford (NYSE: F) combined. The fervor around electric vehicles, though, has not been limited to Tesla. We have seen wild rallies in emerging electric vehicle pure plays including Nikola Corp (NASDAQ: NKLA), Workhorse Group (NASDAQ: WKHS), and NIO Inc. (NYSE: NIO). It seems that investors are willing to speculate on virtually any automaker committed to electrification and, for the most part, those investors have made out quite well this year. As we’ve seen with Nikola Corp, though, not all electric vehicle makers are made equal, nor are they immune to precipitous drops in valuation or spikes in volatility. Accusations of fraud against emerging, unproven companies can be particularly devastating... as can ongoing legal disputes. Nikola investors unfortunate enough to purchase shares of Nikola back in June have watched the stock decline as much as 75%. Even Tesla investors have recently landed on shaky ground. After peaking at ~$500 a share shortly after its much-anticipated stock split, the company had lost a third of its valuation in just over a week. Fed’s Massive Liquidity Injection Equals Million Dollar Retirement? The Fed has injected a RECORD amount of money into the economy... $6 TRILLION and counting. The last time government spending of this magnitude happened, one overlooked sliver of the stock market ROARED. I showed readers how to bank profits of 3,000%... from just ONE trade. [Click here for details.]( Much of what we’re witnessing in the electric vehicle space right now is the inability of the market to efficiently value these emerging and competing companies. We simply do not know who will come out on top, with each company taking different approaches to electrification. Tesla, for instance, just revealed its battery strategy for the next three years, effectively telling the market it is going to stick to conventional lithium-ion batteries. Meanwhile, competing players like Volkswagen are embracing solid-state batteries which threaten to make even Tesla obsolete. That is, of course, if they can figure out how to effectively scale production. With all this uncertainty, the only thing we know for sure is that we don’t know who will be on top five or 10 years from now. That being the case, investors would be wise to diversify across these emerging electric automakers. Simply going all in Tesla, Nikola, or any other company carries too much risk. That all being said, there is also a way to avoid betting on the rat race between all these competing EV companies: stick to the picks and shovels that are the foundation of electrification. What Do All EV Makers Have in Common? When you look “under the hood” of a modern EV, you won’t find much more than trunk space, but metaphorically speaking, you will find commonalities between all modern EVs that are incredibly useful to consider as an investor. We’re talking about critical resources and technologies that will allow EVs to thrive in the first place. Take lithium for instance. The metal is going to be a critical component of batteries whether or not we advance to solid-state technology, so metals and mining companies with exposure to lithium are fantastic candidates for investors. Piedmont Lithium (NASDAQ: PLL) stands out as one timely example. The North Carolina lithium miner climbed from $6 to as high as $37 in September after signing a binding supply agreement with Tesla Inc. These are the kinds of companies you won’t hear about on CNBC until they make that kind of deal but the ones you should be paying attention to regardless. If you’re looking for just one lithium company above all others, Albemarle Corporation (NYSE: Albemarle) is the obvious choice, being the leading provider of lithium for electric vehicle batteries on the market. That said, it isn’t the only pick-and-shovel play you’ll want to consider for EVs. Lithium is a critical resource for EVs as much as charging infrastructure is a critical technology. Arguably, it is the single most important piece of the puzzle. One Molecule Offers Second Crack at 70,000% Gains... Early investors in cannabis earned up to 70,000% gains. Enough to turn $10K into $7 million. This new breakthrough could mean 10 times higher gains. Why? As the FDA sees, it could eradicate chronic diseases like opioid addiction, depression, and others, all with one or two doses of this breakthrough medicine. This breakthrough medicine — composed of a single “magic molecule” — could claim the lion’s share of this trillion-dollar treatment market. [Find briefing on this “magic molecule” here.]( After all, roughly half of the U.S. population does not have ready access to a parking pad, let alone a home charger. Without charging infrastructure, EVs are a difficult sell to a massive portion of the market. Even where EV stations are available, they are often overcrowded because: (1) charging takes a long time, and (2) there are not enough chargers per EV owner. Simply put, no one wants to wait 15 minutes for a charger then another 40 minutes or so to charge. This being the reality of EVs, charging infrastructure and capability is the biggest bottleneck between where we are today and mass consumer adoption. If you’re not thinking about this niche when investing in the EV trend, you’re missing out on a major opportunity. Aerovironment (NASDAQ: AVAV) has long been the only publicly traded company in this regard, but we’re also about to see ChargePoint IPO in the coming months, and I’m all in on that stock. If you want more details on that opportunity in the coming weeks, I recommend checking out the investment newsletter IPO Authority. Monica Savaglia does a fantastic job of running that service, and it is my go-to place for monitoring new public entries to the market. I’m sure she’ll be covering ChargePoint in the near future. You can get a risk-free trial through [this link here](. Until next time, [JS Sig] Jason Stutman [follow basic]( [@JasonStutman on Twitter]( Jason Stutman is Wealth Daily's senior technology analyst and editor of investment advisory newsletters Technology and Opportunity and Topline Trader. His strategy for building winning portfolios is simple: Buy the disruptor, sell the disrupted. Covering the broad sector of technology and occasionally dabbling in the political sphere, Jason has written hundreds of articles spanning topics from consumer electronics and development stage biotechnology to political forecasting and social commentary. Outside the office Jason is a lover of science fiction and the outdoors. He writes through the lens of a futurist, free market advocate, and fiscal conservative. Jason currently hails from Baltimore, Maryland, with roots in the great state of New York. Enjoy reading this article? [Click here]( to like it and receive similar articles to read! Browse Our Archives [Investing in Western Medicine and Biotechs]( [Nice Lithium Profits… If You Can Get Lithium]( [Spend, Spend, Spend]( [How Does the Universe Form Gold?]( [Trump Has COVID-19, Stocks Fall]( --------------------------------------------------------------- This email was sent to {EMAIL}. It is not our intention to send email to anyone who doesn't want it. If you're not sure why you've received this e-letter, or no longer wish to receive it, you may [unsubscribe here](, and view our privacy policy and information on how to manage your subscription. To ensure that you receive future issues of Energy and Capital, please add newsletter@energyandcapital.com to your address book or whitelist within your spam settings. For customer service questions or issues, please contact us for assistance. [Energy and Capital](, Copyright © 2020, [Angel Publishing LLC](. All rights reserved. 3 E Read Street, Baltimore, MD 21202. The content of this site may not be redistributed without the express written consent of Angel Publishing. Individual editorials, articles and essays appearing on this site may be republished, but only with full attribution of both the author and Energy and Capital as well as a link to www.energyandcapital.com. Your privacy is important to us -- we will never rent or sell your e-mail or personal information. Please read our [Privacy Policy](. No statement or expression of opinion, or any other matter herein, directly or indirectly, is an offer or the solicitation of an offer to buy or sell the securities or financial instruments mentioned. While we believe the sources of information to be reliable, we in no way represent or guarantee the accuracy of the statements made herein. [Energy and Capital]( does not provide individual investment counseling, act as an investment advisor, or individually advocate the purchase or sale of any security or investment. The publisher, editors and consultants of Angel Publishing may actively trade in the investments discussed in this publication. They may have substantial positions in the securities recommended and may increase or decrease such positions without notice. Neither the publisher nor the editors are registered investment advisors. Subscribers should not view this publication as offering personalized legal or investment counseling. Investments recommended in this publication should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company in question. ---------------------------------------------------------------

Marketing emails from energyandcapital.com

View More
Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

04/12/2024

Sent On

04/12/2024

Sent On

02/12/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.