Newsletter Subject

Thank You, Elon Musk

From

empirefinancialresearch.com

Email Address

info@exct.empirefinancialresearch.com

Sent On

Tue, Jul 11, 2023 08:32 PM

Email Preheader Text

Herb note: Today's Empire Financial Daily essay is my open letter to business magnate Elon Musk rega

Herb note: Today's Empire Financial Daily essay is my open letter to business magnate Elon Musk regarding Twitter, which he acquired last year after a lengthy, dramatic process. Dear Elon, I owe you a debt of gratitude. I've been on Twitter since 2008, well before Twitter was Twitter. I've been on LinkedIn and Facebook for […] Not rendering correctly? View this e-mail as a web page [here](. [Empire Financial Daily] []Herb note: Today's Empire Financial Daily essay is my open letter to business magnate Elon Musk regarding Twitter, which he acquired last year after a lengthy, dramatic process. --------------------------------------------------------------- Thank You, Elon Musk By Herb Greenberg --------------------------------------------------------------- [Why do hedge funds and billionaires pay this man up to $10,000 a month for his e-mails?]( It reads like a who's who of international finance and power. A billionaire Forbes once ranked among the 40 richest in the world... Two of the top 10 best-performing hedge funds of 2022... A billionaire in the alternative media space. They all turn to one man for his daily (and often uncanny) forecasts of the market. But now, he just went public with a new prediction that could have huge ramifications for the future of our country. [See it for yourself by clicking here by tomorrow, July 12](. --------------------------------------------------------------- Dear Elon, I owe you a debt of gratitude. I've been on Twitter since 2008, well before Twitter was Twitter. I've been on LinkedIn and Facebook for almost just as long, but Twitter became my primary go-to for news, ideas, and online social engagement. For years, it was my first scroll of the morning – replacing formal newspaper websites as the quickest way to see what I might have missed overnight. Whether sitting at my desk looking for a reason to procrastinate, standing in a checkout line waiting to pay for groceries, or even walking the dog, I would check Twitter throughout the day. It was a fantastic time-waster, and I enjoyed allowing myself to be sucked into the social media vortex... in the process, often learning something I didn't know in 280 characters or less. As a journalist and later as a stock researcher, I even used it to instantly post news and even a scoop or two... It was also an exceptional way to informally interact directly with my readers. In the process, it helped me expand my readership and personal "brand," so to speak... and not just in the U.S., but around the world. At my peak, I had nearly 400,000 followers, and didn't lose many when the company did a bot cleanse several years ago. I also had a legacy "blue check," which reflected my public persona. Twitter also helped me find new sources, and it linked me to stories in publications I ordinarily would not have seen... or everyday people whose views I felt were worth including in my orbit. More than anything else, as somebody who has worked in the silo of my home for the better part of a few decades, it provided a sense of community that pierced the isolation of being in an office of one. I also like to think I was an active player in Financial Twitter, or 'FinTwit' as it became known... FinTwit had a built-in audience to talk stocks, markets, and the economy. Above all, though, Twitter was the perfect place to "pop off" about something in the moment... or gripe about customer service that was subpar... or even to simply share a quick photo of a rainbow, sunset, an incredible meal, or something else that might have inspired me in that moment. And the platform seemed to work, warts and all. Even with its increasingly toxic dark side, Twitter was firmly entrenched in my personal, professional, and online social life. --------------------------------------------------------------- Recommended Link: [Imagine writing a $1 million check for your child on their wedding day...]( While everyone is focused on inflation or politics, one small company is tapping into what Warren Buffett calls “the best business in the world.” One investor saw what we call “Chaffee Royalties” turn every $1 he invested into $600… Another made so much money, he gave his daughter a $1 million check as a wedding gift... [Go here now to see how to profit from these “royalties” for as little as $16 a share.]( --------------------------------------------------------------- Then you came along, Elon... In a world that I would argue already was spiraling toward social media fatigue, the new Twitter left me exhausted. It's like your newfound "power" went to your head, and you believed your own press clippings or, put more simply, your own B.S. You had no filter, no editor, and nobody obviously willing to tell you, "No, please don't say that." You became polarizing... and instead of reeling in the toxicity that was turning Twitter into a cesspool, you seemed to relish in adding more arsenic and stink. It was like I was watching Back to the Future and Biff somehow had emerged as the hero. Twitter, instead of being a digital town hall, turned devolved into Dysfunction Junction. While all this was going on, things started to change... Suddenly, I realized Twitter wasn't my first read of the day... or even my second or third. Almost organically, I was back to first checking out the newspapers and e-mails I get from various news sites linking me to stories I might find interesting. At the same time, I realized I was spending considerably less time scrolling through my personally curated Twitter news feed. And I don't think I'm alone, because my chronological feed of the 1,056 people I follow has become a shell of its former self. That seemed to be confirmed by a post over the weekend on Threads – the new Twitter rival launched by Meta Platforms (META) – from Cloudflare (NET) CEO Matthew Prince... Source: Threads/real_eastdakota For me, obviously losing my blue check as part of the purge of legacy blue checks helped magnify what I was feeling. It meant that unless I posted something that organically went viral, Twitter's new algorithms would throttle back my potential audience. Indeed, the number of views for my typical post fell off a cliff – creating a natural disincentive for me to post and engage as much as I used to... Like anything else, this proved to me just how vulnerable Twitter is, because it turned me more into an observer than an active participant. One of the best explanations of what I've been seeing was a post from over the weekend on Threads by Box (BOX) CEO Aaron Levie... As part of a list of "Twitter's mistakes," he specifically called out the "removal of verification for a large swath of accounts that were a main source of the best content, replaced by some of the worst." Source: Threads/levie To be sure, Elon, it seems you realized almost immediately that the blue check purge was a mistake. Why else would you return the blue checks to users who had more than 1 million followers? You were no doubt counting on the rest of us to pay to get our blue checks back... But that assumed Twitter was the center of our lives, and guess what? It wasn't... Instead, as Levie went on to explain, it merely exposed Twitter for having "a confused business model of emphasizing a paid plan that only a fraction of users will ever care about." I certainly see no reason to pay... certainly not right now. I like the "edit" function, and would have paid for that alone before things got weird, but beyond that... why? I'm sure everyone who bought a blue check will make up for those of us who post less, and I'm also pretty sure our absence won't be noted. That said, I continue to post on Twitter, just not nearly as much as I used to... And as I'm sure will be borne out by your stats, I also continue to check out my news feed every now and then – again, much less than I used to. In the meantime, I'm also paying close attention to Threads, and have posted a few things there. (But I have almost zero bandwidth and it's clearly a work in progress.) And a few months ago, I put in a request in for a code to Bluesky. (I'm still waiting.) I tried out Mastodon. (That lasted about a week.) And early on, I also signed up for Post.news. (Never used it.) Beyond that, I'm still somewhat active on LinkedIn, where I have a good presence, and where the quality of my news feed inexplicably seems to be getting better. I post on Facebook occasionally, mostly limited to friends and family. (Yes, I'm in that age group.) And while I have an Instagram account, I haven't posted on it in a very long time. That's because I was all-in on Twitter... and you can only manage so many social media accounts. The truth is, at this point I'm not sure I want to recreate myself there or anywhere else because it takes work, and I've already put in my time... On the other hand, I've been around long enough to know you never know how things will evolve. Or not. If I've learned anything, it's to never say never. Threads may become the Twitter killer, especially if it creates a desktop version and lets you curate your own feed. Or maybe Twitter will regain its former glory. It is, after all, still Twitter. (But then again, Myspace was Myspace.) What I do know is that I no longer have the loyalty I once did. Thanks to your constant drama, following years of being beaten down by Donald Trump turmoil, aided and abetted by Twitter, I simply got burned out by anything that polarizing. That's why I'm thanking you, Elon... You helped me break my Twitter habit. By spending less time there, I learned something else... Life without Twitter is a still a life worth living... in fact, I would argue, a better one. Regards, Herb Greenberg P.S. I've written about you, generally critically, for years. Here's my confession: I got Tesla (TSLA) wrong. I should've realized that when I saw every other car that I was squeezed between in San Diego was a Tesla. There's no doubting your brilliance or your wealth. Your money sends people into space, after all. But brilliance and wealth hasn't prevented you from being tone deaf and certainly not from being infallible. Hopefully the new Twitter CEO Linda Yaccarino can fix this mess, assuming you let her. I keep an open mind. [Get a 60-day, 100% money-back trial to Empire Real Wealth by clicking here.]( --------------------------------------------------------------- If someone forwarded you this e-mail and you would like to be added to the Empire Financial Daily e-mail list to receive e-mails like this every weekday, simply [sign up here](. © 2023 Empire Financial Research. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from Empire Financial Research, 1125 N. Charles Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21201 [www.empirefinancialresearch.com.]( You received this e-mail because you are subscribed to Empire Financial Daily. [Unsubscribe from all future e-mails](

EDM Keywords (231)

years written would world worked work whole weekend week wealth want views verification users used us unless two twitter turned turn truth tried toxicity time threads think things thanks thanking thank tesla tell tapping sure sucked subscribed subpar stories stink still stats squeezed speak space something somebody simply silo shell share sense seen seems seemed seeing see second scoop say said royalties right return rest request removal relish regain reflected reeling redistribution recreate received reason realized readership readers quality put purge publications provided proved progress profit process prevented power posted post pop polarizing point please pierced peak pay part paid owe orbit one office observer number noted newspapers nearly myspace much month moment mistakes mistake might meantime meant mastodon market manage man make loyalty longer long lives little list linkedin linked like lets let less later lasted know keep journalist isolation invested instead inspired inflation home helped head hand guess groceries gripe gratitude going get gave future friends fraction follow focused fix fintwit filter felt feeling feed fact facebook explain expand exhausted evolve everyone even engage emphasizing emerged elon editor economy early doubting dog decades debt day daughter daily curate creates could continue confirmed confession company community code clicking clearly child check cesspool certainly center car built brilliance break bought borne bluesky billionaire beyond believed become beaten back audience arsenic around anything also alone almost adding added accounts absence abetted 2022 16

Marketing emails from empirefinancialresearch.com

View More
Sent On

07/11/2023

Sent On

06/11/2023

Sent On

04/11/2023

Sent On

03/11/2023

Sent On

02/11/2023

Sent On

01/11/2023

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.