Newsletter Subject

Here's Why Twitter Made a Mistake Going Public... Also, Stock-Based Comp and an Update on My Newsletter's Portfolio

From

empirefinancialresearch.com

Email Address

wtilson@exct.empirefinancialresearch.com

Sent On

Tue, Apr 19, 2022 08:33 PM

Email Preheader Text

I was in the camp that social media giant Twitter was making a mistake going public well before its

I was in the camp that social media giant Twitter (TWTR) was making a mistake going public well before its initial public offering ('IPO') in 2013... I reiterated my thoughts in 2014, in a story headlined, "Is Twitter a Victim of Wall Street?" when I wrote... As a public company, it can't get from here […] Not rendering correctly? View this e-mail as a web page [here](. [Empire Financial Daily] Here's Why Twitter Made a Mistake Going Public... Also, Stock-Based Comp and an Update on My Newsletter's Portfolio By Herb Greenberg --------------------------------------------------------------- [Do you own these popular stocks?]( My stock market "early warning system" is flashing red right now. Just like when I called the 2020 crash three weeks early... Or when I predicted the demise of Peloton. Or the time I uncovered over 50 publicly-traded scam companies, on behalf of the FBI. Inflation is here... Interest rates are going up... And I believe there are 14 currently popular stocks all investors should get rid of immediately. If you [click here]( I'll give you the names of a few of those companies for free. --------------------------------------------------------------- I was in the camp that social media giant Twitter (TWTR) was making a mistake going public well before its initial public offering ('IPO') in 2013... I reiterated my thoughts in 2014, in a [story]( headlined, "Is Twitter a Victim of Wall Street?" when I wrote... As a public company, it can't get from here to there without the type of scrutiny – pegged to a stock price – that could demoralize executives and employees who are suddenly put on the defense when all they are trying to do is create and improve something they believe is great. A year later, as Twitter started to get pulled through the muck, I [tweeted](... While the link to that article posted on LinkedIn is no longer live, I wrote that... Companies caught in that bind of going public too early – especially if they're as highly used and high profile as Twitter – risk becoming the punching bag for investors, commentators and just about anybody and everybody else who has an opinion. (Yours truly, included.) For management, employees, and other stakeholders, the controversy over Twitter the stock becomes disruptive and distracting – just when disruption and distraction is needed the least. The reality is this: Twitter is an evolving enterprise that cannot be fixed in one quarter, two quarters, or three quarters. Its future business model is likely not to be its current business model. I added... It will always be compared with Facebook, even though they are two distinctly different businesses that happen to be in social media. There will be calls for its CEO's head, which is kind of silly because it's unclear anybody else could do a better job. There will be calls for an activist to arrive on the scene, which is absurd, because that's the last thing Twitter needs right now. (See above on distraction.) And there will be calls, such as mine, for the company to be sold in a friendly deal orchestrated by management. That's probably its best shot to create the strategy that ultimately will keep everybody's eye on Twitter the service as opposed to Twitter the stock. That latter point ­– the stock versus the service – is often missed in the message of Wall Street. All too often investors confuse the two, and in the case of Twitter it's too bad because I would hate to see the focus on the stock lead to actions that negatively impact the service. --------------------------------------------------------------- Recommended Link: [The Biggest Innovation of the 21st century – Steve Jobs (Hint: Not Apple)]( Just before his death in 2011, the founder of Apple said that the biggest innovations of the 21st century will be at the intersection of biology and technology. Exactly a decade later, one little known company is doing just that. The company already has million dollar deals with fortune 500 companies. And Steve Jobs' biggest rival, Bill Gates has already invested millions in this company, which has the potential to become "[America's Next Big Monopoly]( --------------------------------------------------------------- All of which gets us where we are today... On the plus side, despite a few rocky years, Twitter's share price today of less than $50 is considerably higher than the IPO price of $26, while annual revenue since then has more than quintupled. And by going public, the company raised cash to hire and grow. On the flip side, Tesla (TSLA) CEO Elon Musk's bid (real or not) has put the company in play. Since Twitter is public, as expected, its executives and employees now have the "fun" and possible demoralization of not only being distracted by a possible tug-of-war over control of the company, but also – more important – what a possible buyer thinks the service should be... and how many fewer employees it needs. I stand by what I said originally: Twitter never should have gone public. Given everything that has been going on, it very well might not be for much longer. Meanwhile, no sooner did I write [my essay last week]( on the effect of falling stocks on stock-based compensation than my friends at Kailash Concepts published their own [take]( and it's a doozy... From the report... As we can all agree: compensation expenses, including share based payments, are an operating expense. Despite the rule change, regulators inexplicably allowed these payments to be added back in the cash flow statement. This nonsense distorts financial statements' ability to explain a firm's actual profitability. Friends. This just is not that complicated. When a company issues stock to employees or the public it increases shares outstanding and dilutes earnings per share. Give the stock to the employee and the cash doesn't show up on the balance sheet. Robbing Peter to pay Paul. In broad daylight. Or... smoke and mirrors. That's certainly the case while stocks of these companies – many of them profitless – are rising. But when stocks are falling, it's just the opposite. This chart from Kailash shows what has happened to the market cap of firms with []stock-based comp of greater than 33% of their revenue... Speaking of stock-based compensation, here's a comment from the mailbag... As reader Keith M. writes... Not enough people consider, or write about, the impact on cash flows from the repurchase of shares that is necessary to prevent dilution from exercises of stock options. For example, over a 10-year period, UnitedHealthcare spent about $18 billion to buy back about the same number of shares they issued for options exercised during that period. The options exercised only brought in about $1 billion. That math is simple. Using options in lieu of cash can have a significant negative impact on cash flows, in the long term. Growth companies increasing the amount of cash compensation in lieu of options could be preserving cash flow, in the long run. That's an interesting way of looking at it, Keith... Thanks for the perspective! Finally, an update on the portfolio of my paid newsletter, Herb Greenberg's []Investment Opportunities... We launched with the initial portfolio just at the peak of the most recent cycle, with a goal of outperforming the market over the next two to five years. So it's no surprise that the Investment Opportunities portfolio has mirrored the market. But... despite the market's malaise over the past month, one of our stocks is up 20%, while another is up 11%. We're not looking for quick trades – in fact, we believe both stocks have more upside from here. But it's a reminder that even in long-term portfolios there can be short-term winners. If you're not already a subscriber, you can find out how to gain instant access to the full portfolio [right here](. As always, feel free to reach out via e-mail by [clicking here](mailto:feedback@empirefinancialresearch.com?subject=Feedback%20for%20Herb). And if you're on Twitter, feel free to follow me there at [@herbgreenberg](. My DMs are open. I look forward to hearing from you. Regards, Herb Greenberg April 19, 2022 If someone forwarded you this e-mail and you would like to be added to my e-mail list to receive e-mails like this every weekday, simply [sign up here](. © 2022 Empire Financial Research. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from Empire Financial Research, 601 Lexington Ave., 20th Floor, New York, NY 10022 [www.empirefinancialresearch.com.]( You received this e-mail because you are subscribed to Empire Financial Daily. [Unsubscribe from all future e-mails](

Marketing emails from empirefinancialresearch.com

View More
Sent On

07/11/2023

Sent On

06/11/2023

Sent On

04/11/2023

Sent On

03/11/2023

Sent On

02/11/2023

Sent On

01/11/2023

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.