Newsletter Subject

We don’t need another Ted Cruz in the Senate

From

elissaslotkin.org

Email Address

info@e.elissaslotkin.org

Sent On

Wed, Sep 18, 2024 11:21 PM

Email Preheader Text

?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ??

 ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ {NAME} — You may have already seen the headlines: yesterday, Senate Republicans, led by Ted Cruz, loudly proclaimed their support for protecting IVF — and then promptly blocked the Right to IVF Act in the Senate. The bill he blocked would have simply said individuals have a right to “receive fertility treatment from a health care provider” and “make decisions and arrangements regarding the donation, testing, use, storage, or disposition of reproductive genetic material,” like sperm, eggs, and embryos. But he couldn’t even bring himself to vote for it. Beyond Cruz’s sheer shamelessness, something caught our eye: our opponent, Mike Rogers, came out to celebrate Ted Cruz’s fight to “protect” IVF. [Mike Rogers Tweet]( Rogers’ support for IVF runs just about as deep as Ted Cruz’s. All you need to do is look at the actual voting record: Between 2005 and 2013, Rogers co-sponsored 4 (!) bills that defined embryos as persons from the moment of conception, just as the Alabama legislation that shut down IVF. Before that, Rogers supported a nationwide ban on abortion that could have also made IVF nearly impossible. In fact, Rogers and Cruz have essentially the same voting record on the issue of choice and IVF. So here’s the thing: either Rogers didn’t understand what he was doing when he signed on to all these bills, or he simply didn’t care what would happen to women, to families, and to our communities should his bills have become law. Michigan doesn’t need another Ted Cruz in the U.S. Senate. (Heck, Texas doesn’t even need the Ted Cruz they’ve got in the Senate!) And we certainly don’t need someone who has voted against women and families for two decades, then tries to swindle you into believing he’ll change and support your rights if elected to the Senate. Michiganders just don’t buy it. [So we’re asking: will you chip in $3 to make sure that Michigan’s next Senator isn’t a Ted Cruz 2.0?]( If you've stored your info with ActBlue, we'll process your contribution instantly: [Donate $3]( [Donate $25]( [Donate $50]( [Donate $100]( [Donate $250]( [Other Amount]( Thank you, Team Slotkin  PAID FOR BY ELISSA SLOTKIN FOR MICHIGAN P.O. Box 4145 East Lansing, MI 48826 This email was sent to [{EMAIL}](#). Email is a very important way we communicate with supporters like you, but if you want to, you can [unsubscribe here](. [Sign up here to receive fewer emails.]( Elissa Slotkin served in the Central Intelligence Agency and the Department of Defense. Use of her job titles and photographs during service do not imply endorsement by the Central Intelligence Agency OR the Department of Defense.

Marketing emails from elissaslotkin.org

View More
Sent On

07/11/2024

Sent On

07/11/2024

Sent On

05/11/2024

Sent On

02/11/2024

Sent On

01/11/2024

Sent On

31/10/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.