Newsletter Subject

Do We Need Tech or Structural Breakthroughs?

From

eftp.co

Email Address

eftp@eftp.co

Sent On

Tue, Sep 7, 2021 06:01 PM

Email Preheader Text

Breakthroughs, Adaptations, and the Future of Food When I used to think about the future of food and

[View this email in your browser]( Breakthroughs, Adaptations, and the Future of Food When I used to think about the future of food and the possible ways we can reshape our food system, I envisioned a transformation, led by breakthroughs that would push us past current patterns into better ones. But as time passed, I’ve grown to realize that this thinking was predicated on the assumption that the only way forward was to make giant leaps in how we produce, distribute and consume food. This required breakthroughs from a technological, structural and to a lesser extent, cultural (or consumer) standpoint to take our food system from where it is today (emitting a third of global greenhouse gas emissions) to one that drains less of our natural resources and hopefully contributes significantly less to the climate crisis. Let’s examine technological breakthroughs first. Plant-based and cultured meat, dairy and egg alternatives or vertical farming fall neatly into this category. But the food system isn’t like computer technology or the internet. It is a complex, interconnected system that has evolved over centuries and is deeply woven into the fabric of not only our economic systems, but also human culture, and the way we nourish ourselves and ensure our very survival on this planet. In other words, it is an essential system performing a critical planetary function at all levels of civilization. But technological breakthroughs don’t come easily. And even if they do, they take years, sometimes decades to truly transform into the norm from farm to what you get in the grocery store and what ultimately ends up in your refrigerator, pantry, and plate. This probably explains why after a decade of growth and billions in venture funding meat alternatives make up only 1.5% of total meat sales while traditional meat sales continue to rise. Milk alternatives have fared much better, making up 15% of the retail milk market, but the dairy industry shows no signs of slowing down its grasp on the food system. That’s why some experts argue that the time frames required for such breakthroughs to capture sizable market share and actually lead to a decline in production and consumption of animal protein are too long, while factory farming continues to ravage the planet and the climate crisis escalates. SO WHAT'S THE ALTERNATIVE? [Continue Reading]( [Twitter]( [Facebook]( [Website]( Copyright © 2021 Eat For The Planet LLC, All rights reserved. You are receiving this email because you opted in via our website. Our mailing address is: Eat For The Planet LLC 2355 Westwood Boulevard #1809Los Angeles, CA 90064 [Add us to your address book]( Want to change how you receive these emails? You can [update your preferences]( or [unsubscribe from this list](.

Marketing emails from eftp.co

View More
Sent On

19/08/2022

Sent On

16/11/2021

Sent On

03/11/2021

Sent On

01/11/2021

Sent On

21/10/2021

Sent On

11/10/2021

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.