Newsletter Subject

The milk companies need to chill out

From

eater.com

Email Address

newsletters@eater.com

Sent On

Sun, Jun 4, 2023 01:00 PM

Email Preheader Text

Got milk drama? Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Aubrey Plaza in a commercial f

Got milk drama?                   [View on web]( Aubrey Plaza in a commercial for Wood Milk, which is not real. | Milk Processor Education Program (MilkPEP) Usually, when a television commercial causes a stir, it’s because there’s something salacious or controversial about it. But right now, the commercial on the airwaves that’s inspired the most outsized response is... a joke about milk. The drama involves [a commercial for the USDA’s Milk Processor Education Program]( (MilkPEP) — which Vox describes as the “quasi-governmental dairy industry organization” that was responsible for the famous “got milk?” ad campaign — in which Aubrey Plaza plays the fake spokesperson for a nondairy brand called Wood Milk. The joke is that this brand of plant-based milk is made with wood, which means that it tastes gross. It’s a direct jab at alternative milks like oat and almond, both of which MilkPEP says are [nutritionally inferior to cow’s milk]( and taste worse. A [complaint]( filed in May by the nonprofit advocacy group Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, though, alleges that this latest pro-dairy campaign goes too far, perhaps in violation of federal laws intended to prevent the “disparaging” of competing products. But it’s an interesting position for the organization to take, considering that plant milk brands have often engaged in similar attacks on the healthfulness and sustainability of cow’s milk. At present, Oatly maintains [multiple pages on its website to bust “milk myths,"]( and has used its Instagram account to [criticize government subsidies that make dairy more accessible to schoolchildren]( than plant-based options in Europe. Silk’s new dairy-free offering Nextmilk[cheekily nodded to the organization’s “got milk?” campaign]( in its launch ads with a 2023 take on those classic milk mustaches. It makes sense that these companies are so dead-set on slamming their competitors given that they’re all vying for the largest share of a multibillion-dollar industry. But by and large, nobody wants to wade through this sea of aggressive ad campaigns when they’re wandering down the milk aisle. Whether you buy almond milk because you think it’s better for the environment, or stick to dairy because you prefer the taste, or choose your milk according to your medical circumstances or religious beliefs, there’s always going to be someone telling you that you’re making the wrong choice. It also doesn’t help that there are so many different companies, each pushing their own profit agenda. Their concerns about the environment and your health are largely performative. Of course, the [almond milk companies don’t want you to think about how much water is needed in drought-plagued California]( to grow its most essential ingredient, and the dairy industry doesn't want you to think too hard about [how it treats the animals that are its literal cash cows](. No one here has a whole lot of moral high ground, even as they insist that their product is the most virtuous. And whether or not the Wood Milk campaign is actually in violation of federal law, it is most definitely annoying. Plant-based milk tastes fine, it’s not overall any more or less nutritious than cow’s milk, and it’s perfectly reasonable to want to avoid the nightmare that is the American dairy production system. But it’s also fine to want to pour some regular old 2 percent into your coffee every morning and completely ignore these obnoxious ad campaigns intended to make you feel guilty about something as morally neutral as milk. — Amy McCarthy, Eater staff writer Related reading: - This Vox [explainer lays out the ongoing battle over calling plant-based substitutes “milk” and “meat.”]( - Curious about other milk-related stunts? Check out Fck Oatly, a [website created by the brand to address its haters in a weirdly aggressive tone](, and the [ensuing]( [spin-off]( [sites]( it inspired (but these ones actually do hate Oatly). - Finally, an explanation why [oat milk is still expensive](, via the Guardian. If you like this email, please forward it to a friend. If you aren't signed up for this newsletter, you can [do so right here](.   [Facebook]( [Twitter]( [Instagram]( This email was sent to {EMAIL}. Manage your [email preferences]( or [unsubscribe](param=today). View our [Privacy Notice]( and our [Terms of Service](. Vox Media, 1201 Connecticut Ave. NW, Floor 11, Washington, DC 20036. Copyright © 2023. All rights reserved.

Marketing emails from eater.com

View More
Sent On

08/11/2024

Sent On

04/11/2024

Sent On

01/11/2024

Sent On

22/10/2024

Sent On

17/10/2024

Sent On

16/10/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.