Newsletter Subject

The Supreme Court: Beyond accountability?

From

dfa-af.com

Email Address

info@dfa-af.com

Sent On

Sun, May 14, 2023 05:02 PM

Email Preheader Text

If Chief Justice Roberts will not testify voluntarily about ethical lapses at the Supreme Court, the

If Chief Justice Roberts will not testify voluntarily about ethical lapses at the Supreme Court, the Senate Judicial Committee should subpoena him. [Democracy for America Advocacy Fund](#) {NAME}, As significant ethics violations of Supreme Court justices have continued to emerge in recent weeks, it has become increasingly clear: There must be means to hold Supreme Court justices accountable. Testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee is one such means. But when Chairman Dick Durbin invited Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts to testify before the Committee -- voluntarily -- on May 2, Chief Justice Roberts refused, saying that for a Chief Justice to give such testimony is “exceedingly rare.” But Chief Justice Roberts is presiding over a court in which serious ethical violations have been anything but rare. In recent weeks, concerns have arisen involving Justices Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, Samuel Alito, Brett Kavanaugh, Amy Coney Barrett, and even Roberts himself. If Chief Justice Roberts does not see fit to address these concerns before Congress voluntarily, then the Judiciary Committee must issue a subpoena to compel him to testify under oath. [Add your name to call on Chairman Dick Durbin to subpoena Chief Justice Roberts and hold the Supreme Court accountable for ethical lapses and they’re failure to police themselves now.]( [ADD YOUR NAME]( Among the most egregious examples of judicial misconduct of which we have learned, Justice Clarence Thomas accepting -- and not disclosing -- millions of dollars worth of gifts and travel from a Republican mega-donor, as well as his repeated refusal to recuse himself from cases due to conflicts of interest posed by his wife Ginni Thomas’s extremist activism, stand out. But new concerns have arisen regarding other justices as well, such as the revelation that Justice Neil Gorsuch sold a 40-acre Colorado property for over $1.8 million to the CEO of a law firm with over 2,000 attorneys that has had 22 cases before the Supreme Court since Gorsuch was appointed. Gorsuch reported the sale in disclosure documents, but strangely enough, though legally required, the box for indicating the buyer was left blank. Were Gorsuch’s opinions in these multiple cases biased by his business relationship with the CEO of Greenberg Traurig? He should have recused himself, but Gorsuch sided with Greenberg Traurig in 67% of the 12 cases in which he filed an opinion. Gorsuch also spoke alongside Gov. Ron DeSantis and former Vice President Mike Pence at a Florida Federalist Society event in 2022 that was closed to the press, and he failed to recuse himself from a case involving Penguin Random House Books, which has paid him over $650,000 in book sales since becoming a justice. Other justices too have experienced ethical lapses. Justices Samuel Alito and Brett Kavanaugh met privately with the head of the National Organization for Marriage, which filed amicus briefs in three cases the justices decided. Alito also failed to recuse in a number of cases involving companies in which he held stock, including Disney, Merck, Rockwell, and PNC Bank. Meanwhile, Americans for Prosperity spent over $1 million to support the confirmation of Justice Amy Barrett, but she did not recuse herself from a 2021 case involving the group. Justice Barrett also gave a speech standing next to Minority Leader Mitch McConnell at the University of Louisville, having just enjoyed dinner with Senator McConnell and his friends, in which she proclaimed that the Court should not be viewed as political. Now Chief Justice Roberts himself has come under fire for conflicts of interest, as his wife has earned millions of dollars in commissions for placing prominent Washington lawyers at top law firms, some of which have cases before the Supreme Court. Roberts also failed to recuse himself from cases involving firms in which he held stock, including Texas Instruments, Life Technologies, and AT&T. [Supreme Court Justices have too much power to be allowed to act with impunity, but Chief Justice Roberts has indicated he will not testify voluntarily for the Senate Judiciary Committee. Add your name to urge Chairman Dick Durbin to subpoena Chief Justice Roberts to address these concerns now!]( Thank you for doing your part to bring accountability to the Supreme Court. - Amanda Amanda Ford, Director Democracy for America Advocacy Fund [Power This Campaign]( Democracy for America Advocacy Fund is a 501c4 organization. Contributions to the Democracy for America Advocacy Fund are not tax deductible for federal income tax purposes. Our mailing address is: PO Box 8521, Essex Junction VT 05451  Sent via [ActionNetwork.org](. To update your email address, change your name or address, or to stop receiving emails from Democracy for America Advocacy Fund, please [click here](.

Marketing emails from dfa-af.com

View More
Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

04/12/2024

Sent On

02/12/2024

Sent On

29/11/2024

Sent On

05/11/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.