Boeing cites risks in design of newest Airbus jet

[DearWallstreet.com] DWS Daily on Mar 02, 2021 EMAIL}/redirect [Boeing cites risks in design of newest Airbus jet Tim Hepher]( Image]( By Tim Hepher PARIS (Reuters) - Boeing Co has raised concerns over the design of arch-rival Airbus' newest narrow-body jet, the A321XLR, saying a novel type of fuel tank could pose fire risks. The U.S. plane giant's intervention is not without precedent in a global system that regularly allows manufacturers to chime in whenever safety rules are being interpreted in a way that might affect the rest of the industry. But it comes at a pivotal moment as Boeing emerges from a two-year safety crisis over its competing 737 MAX, and Airbus faces its own crucial test of the tougher mood expected from regulators worldwide following the MAX's 20-month grounding. In a submission to the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), Boeing said the architecture of a fuel tank intended to increase the A321XLR's range "presents many potential hazards." The debate surrounds the hot-selling A321XLR's main marketing point - the longest range of any single-aisle jet. In most jets, fuel is carried in wings and central tanks. To meet demand for longer routes, Airbus has already added optional extra fuel tanks inside the cargo bay of some A321s. For the A321XLR, Airbus plans to eke out more space for fuel by moulding one tank directly into the fuselage, meaning its shape would follow the contours of the jet and carry more fuel. The concept caught the attention of EASA which in January said it would impose special conditions to keep passengers safe. "An integral fuselage fuel tank exposed to an external fire, if not adequately protected, may not provide enough time for the passengers to safely evacuate the aircraft," it said. In comments to EASA first reported by Flightglobal, Boeing cited risks if a jet veers off a runway or its wheels fail. "Public consultation is part-and-parcel of an aircraft development programme," an Airbus spokesman said, adding any issues raised would be tackled together with regulators. COMMERCIAL STAKES Such technical exchanges rarely capture attention. But a battered aerospace industry is on edge after the MAX crisis, compounded by COVID-19, shook confidence in aviation. Commercial stakes are also high. One industry source familiar with the project warned any extended wrangle over certification could delay the A321XLR's service entry from "late 2023" to 2024 or beyond. Should that happen, sources say Boeing is expected to encourage airlines to wait a few years longer for a potential all-new model that insiders say would leapfrog the A321XLR. While insisting they never compete on safety, Airbus and Boeing have a record of goading each other in the past over issues like novel flight computers on the Airbus A320 or European claims that four engines were safer than the 777's two. Fuel tanks have provoked particularly sharp disagreement. In 2001, the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration triggered changes to the design of fuel tanks worldwide, five years after a Boeing 747 exploded in mid-air. Investigators said TWA 800 was brought down by a fuel-tank explosion in the presence of unwanted oxygen, but Airbus officials maintained their own jets were less at risk. (Reporting by Tim Hepher in Paris; Additional reporting by Eric M. Johnson; Editing by Matthew Lewis) [U.S. Commerce sets anti-dumping duties on aluminum sheet from 16 countries]( WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Commerce Department on Tuesday issued final anti-dumping duties ...([Continue Reading]( EMAIL}/redirect [State treasurers pressure Marathon to end lockout at Minnesota refinery]( By Laura Sanicola (Reuters) - A group of state treasurers are pressuring Marathon ...([Continue Reading]( [Rio Tinto Chairman Simon Thompson to step down in 2022]( (Reuters) - Rio Tinto Ltd said on Wednesday Simon Thompson will step down as chairman next year ...([Continue Reading]( EMAIL}/redirect GENERAL NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER - PLEASE READ CAREFULLY THE FOLLOWING NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER MUST BE READ AND UNDERSTOOD AND YOU MUST AGREE TO THE TERMS CONTAINED THEREIN BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE OR SUBSCRIBING TO OUR NEWSLETTER.This is a PAID ADVERTISEMENT provided to customers/subscribers of dearwallstreet. Although we have sent you this email, dearwallstreet does NOT specifically endorse this product nor is it responsible for the content of this message. Furthermore, we make no guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. DISCLAIMER: In accordance with Section 17(b) of the Securities Act of 1933, you are hereby advised that dearwallstreet. "DWS" is receiving a fee of over $1000.00 in cash, from an independent third party as compensation for the distribution of this message. DWS has not determined if the statements and opinions of the advertiser are accurate, correct or truthful. The purpose of this message, like any advertising, is to provide publicity for the advertising company, its products or services. You should not rely on the information presented; you should do independent research to form your own opinion and decision. Information contained in our disseminated emails does not constitute investment, legal or tax advice upon which you should rely. The purchase of high-risk securities may result in the loss of your entire investment. Advertisements received by you are not a solicitation or recommendation to buy securities of the advertised company. An offer to buy or sell securities can be made only by a disclosure document that complies with applicable securities laws and only in the States or other jurisdictions in which the security is eligible for sale. Advertisements distributed through disseminated emails are not disclosure documents. If you are considering purchasing any securities of an advertised company, you should call your State Securities Administrator to determine if the security may be sold in your State. Many companies have information filed with State securities regulators who may be able to supply you with additional information. You also should read and review, if and to the extent available, any information concerning an advertised company available at the web sites of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") at and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (the "FINRA") at . We also strongly recommend that you read the SEC advisory to investors concerning Internet Stock Fraud at as well as related information published by the NASD on how to invest carefully. You are responsible for verifying all claims and conducting your own due diligence. You agree and acknowledge that any hyperlinks to the website of (1) an advertised company, (2) the party issuing or preparing the information for the advertised company, or (3) other information contained in our disseminated emails is provided only for your reference and convenience. We are not responsible for the accuracy or reliability of these external sites, nor are we responsible for the content, advertising, opinions, products or other materials on external sites or information sources. If you use, act upon or make decisions in reliance on information contained in any disseminated email or any hyperlink, you do so at your own risk and agree to hold us, our officers, directors, shareholders, affiliates and agents harmless. You acknowledge that you are not relying on us, and we are not liable for, any actions taken by you based on any information contained in any disseminated email or hyperlink. You also acknowledge that we are not an investment advisory service, a broker-dealer or an investment adviser. You acknowledge that you will consult with your own advisers regarding any decisions as to any advertised company. dearwallstreet.com is affilated with interactiveoffers.com. Rua Frei Tomé de Jesus n. 18 1 dto. Lisboa Lisboa 1700-215 PORTUGAL [Unsubscribe]( | [Change Subscriber Options](