Newsletter Subject

The Ides of March

From

dailyreckoning.com

Email Address

dr@email.dailyreckoning.com

Sent On

Tue, Mar 15, 2022 10:32 PM

Email Preheader Text

Fed, Beware Were you forwarded this email? . The Ides of March - Beware the ides of March? - ?

Fed, Beware Were you forwarded this email? [Sign-up to The Daily Reckoning here.]( [Unsubscribe]( [Daily Reckoning] It’s come to our attention that you might be missing out on extra benefits exclusively for The Daily Reckoning subscribers. Check out our website where you can find archives, updates, and everything else included in your subscription. You can access it by [clicking here now](. The Ides of March - Beware the ides of March… - “It seems obvious that the odds of recession are now well above average here in the United States”… - How high would rates have to go to kill inflation?… Recommended Link [10X bigger than 2008?!]( [Read more here...]( The man who predicted the 2008 financial crisis, the election of Donald Trump, Brexit, and even the 2020 Coronavirus market crisis… Is in Washington making another startling prediction. [Click Here To View His Urgent Warning]( Annapolis, Maryland March 15, 2022 [Brian Maher]Dear Reader, Today is March 15 — the ides of the month. “Beware the ides of March,” the soothsayer warned Julius Caesar… presciently. Should investors likewise beware the ides of March? Today and tomorrow the Federal Reserve’s Open Market Committee — so-called — huddles at Washington. These are the questions presently hanging in the air: Will Mr. Powell and his mates finally push the federal funds rate up from zero — even as recessionary omens gather? Or will the unpleasantness overseas hand them excuse to stand paws off, to sit idly upon their perspiring hands? Prior to Mr. Putin’s adventuring, many prognosticators soothsaid a 50-basis-point hike. They reasoned a 0.50% hike would get good water on the inflationary flames currently fanning. These flames are beginning to menace the population… The latest producer’s price index reveals a galloping 10% annual rate of increase. And consumer price inflation blisters at 40-year highs. Little relief is in prospect. Explains Oxford Economics: Inflation in the pipeline is showing few signs of decelerating in the near term, especially as the Russia-Ukraine war wreaks havoc in energy and other commodity markets. Higher input costs will keep producer prices frustratingly elevated and continue to squeeze profit margins, likely feeding higher consumer prices in the coming months until war tensions unwind and goods demand moderates. Of especial concern is the oil price. When oil spirals at such dizzying rates as presently, recession odds spiral with it. Mr. Mark Zandi, chief economist of Moody's Analytics, estimates the odds of recession within the following 12–18 months at one in three. “It seems obvious that the odds of recession are now well above average here in the United States,” adds a certain Gerard MacDonell with 22V Research. How will the Federal Reserve conduct itself? ([Go here]( for Jim Rickards’ answer, and why Jim is starting a “countdown to crisis”). It is unlikely the Federal Reserve will announce a 50-basis-point hosing tomorrow. The Ukraine affair will likely hold them to a 25-basis-point sprinkling. They will likely keep raising interest rates into next year. But enough to douse inflation’s fires? It is… unlikely. Crane your neck. Glance backward to the wildly inflationary year of 1980… The average inflation rate ran to a punishing 13.5%. Meantime, the average nominal interest rate went at 13.35% — plenty handsome. Thus the inflation rate and the nominal interest rate were closely aligned. The real interest rate – the nominal rate minus the inflation rate — thus went at negative 0.15% (13.35 – 13.5 = -0.15). Paul Volcker was determined to get his hands around inflation’s neck. To strangle fatally he squeezed and squeezed until rates ticked 20%. Now come home… Consumer price inflation presently speeds at an annualized 7.9% rate. Meantime, the Federal Reserve’s target rate gutters along between 0% and 0.25%. Hence the real interest rate — the nominal rate minus inflation — ranges between negative 7.65% and negative 7.90%. Recall, Paul Volcker confronted a negative 0.15% real rate. Assume the present inflation maintains its 7.9% gait. The Federal Reserve would have to elevate rates above 10% to cage inflation as Volcker caged inflation. Can you imagine it? Paul Volcker’s economy was but one fraction as indebted as today’s economy. Today’s economy has been erected upon the beach sand of cheap credit, now piling to levels truly abominable. Neither the stock market nor the economy could endure Volcker’s type of roughhousing. Neither could hold out against the 10%-plus rates the business would require today. For the matter of that, we are unconvinced either can withstand rates much above 2%. Meaningfully higher rates will send them both heaping down, collapsed and wrecked. Hence the Federal Reserve hangs from the hooks of a mighty dilemma it itself has engineered. Its options are these: Raise rates and push the economy and the stock market over. Or let inflation burn its way clear through the dollar. Good luck, ladies and gentlemen — you will need it — and then some more. Below, Jim Rickards shows you why the Federal Reserve keeps bungling over and over again. Read on, if you can take it. Regards, [Brian Maher] Brian Maher Managing Editor, The Daily Reckoning Editor’s note: Did you catch Jim Rickards’ emergency [Countdown to Crisis Event]( yesterday? This was urgent information and it generated a ton of chatter. Jim explained why he believes a [massive “Dow drop” of 80% or more could take place less than 24 hours from now…]( This could be one of the biggest financial events of our lifetimes, Jim warns. That’s because a frightening pattern that’s taking shape now also showed up before the big stock market crash in 1987… before the dot-com bubble burst in 2000… and before the Panic of 2008. In the broadcast, Jim revealed [exactly how he thinks you should prepare for it.]( But time is running short. If you missed yesterday’s broadcast, the good news is you can still see a full replay of it, at least for now. [Go here now for immediate access.]( P.P.S. If you hear the hammering in the background at 2:58, we apologize. But this broadcast from Washington, D.C., was too urgent to bother with any sound edits. [Click Here for Your Urgent Rebroadcast]( Recommended Link [Attention! Before You Read Any Further…]( Before you read any further in today’s issue, an urgent situation needs your immediate attention. If you don’t plan on claiming this new upgrade to your Strategic Intelligence subscription, you’re missing out on a huge opportunity. Right now is your chance to grab one of the biggest (and most valuable) upgrades our company has ever made to a newsletter. I’m taking Strategic Intelligence to an entirely new level and I’d hate to see you left behind. [Click Here Now]( The Daily Reckoning Presents: “The Fed has the worst forecasting record in the world. It’s basically been wrong every year since 2009”… ****************************** Why the Fed Keeps Getting It Wrong By Jim Rickards [Jim Rickards]What we’re seeing now is the very definition of volatility. The market’s in a highly unstable state right now. These violent swings show the inadequacy of the standard models that the Fed and other mainstream analysts use. The Fed assumes so many things about markets that are simply false, like that markets are always efficient, for example. They’re not. Under volatile conditions like these they gap up and down — they don’t move in rational, predictable increments like the “efficient-market hypothesis” supposes. The problem is that the Fed’s models are empirically false. Studies have proven how faulty their models are. The Fed has the worst forecasting record in the world. It’s basically been wrong every year since 2009. Equilibrium models like the Fed uses basically say the world runs like a clock and occasionally it gets knocked out of equilibrium. And all you have to do is tweak policy or manipulate some variable to push it back into equilibrium. It’s like resetting a clock. That’s a shorthand way of describing what an equilibrium model is. They treat markets like they’re some kind of machine. It’s a 19th-century, mechanistic approach. But traditional approaches that rely on static models bear little relationship to reality. Twenty-first-century markets aren’t machines and they don’t work in this clockwork fashion. The Fed uses equilibrium models to understand an economy that is not an equilibrium system; it’s a complex dynamic system. The Fed uses the Phillips curve to understand the relationship between unemployment and inflation when 50 years of data say there is no fixed relationship. The Fed uses what’s called value-at-risk modelling based on normally distributed events when the evidence is clear that the degree distribution of risk events is a power curve, not a normal or bell curve. As a result of these defective models, the Fed printed trillions of new money beginning in 2008 to ‘stimulate’ the economy, only to produce the weakest recovery in history. Need proof? Every year, the Federal Reserve forecasts economic growth on a one-year forward basis. And it’s been wrong every year for the better part of a decade. When I say ‘wrong’, I mean by orders of magnitude. If the Fed forecast 3.5% growth and actual growth was 3.3%, I would consider that to be awesome. But the Fed would forecast 3.5% growth and it would come in at 2.2%. That’s not even close, considering that growth is confined to plus or minus 4% in the vast majority of years ([go here]( to see why the Fed’s about to make another serious mistake). Right now the economy faces severe headwinds in the form of geopolitical instability, inflation and supply chain disruptions. The chances of recession are high. The Fed needs interest rates to be between 4% and 5% to fight recession. That’s how much “dry powder” the Fed needs going into a recession. In September 2007, the fed funds rate was at 4.75%, toward the high end of the range. That gave the Fed plenty of room to cut, which it certainly did. Between 2008 and 2015, rates were essentially at zero. The current fed funds target rate is between 0% and 0.25%. If we have a recession this year the Fed doesn’t have anywhere near the room to cut as it did to fight the Great Recession. Recommended Link [Prepare yourself NOW for a CRASH]( A massive market crash could be imminent. [This new must-see presentation]( explains exactly how and WHEN it could happen… You’ll learn 5 CRITICAL steps every American should take to help protect themselves. And details a strategy we believe has the power to 10X your money while the market tanks. So there is NO time to sit by and wait for it to happen. [Click here to watch this video now]( while you still have a chance. Because if and when this next crash hits… It will be FAST and it will be BLOODY. [Click Here To Learn More]( During its hiking cycle that ended in December 2018, the Fed was trying to get rates closer to 5% so they could cut them as much as needed in a new recession. But, they failed. Interest rates only topped out at 2.5%. The market reaction and a slowing economy caused the Fed to reverse course and engage in easing. Can the Fed even get to 2% in its upcoming tightening cycle before it reverses course again? Here’s the deeper problem with all the Fed’s manipulations… The problem with any kind of market manipulation (what central bankers call “policy”) is that there’s no way to end it without unintended and usually negative consequences. Once you start down the path of manipulation, it requires more and more manipulation to keep the game going. Finally it no longer becomes possible to turn back without crashing the system. Of course, manipulation by government agencies and central banks always starts out with good intentions. They are trying to “save” the banks or “save” the market from extreme outcomes or crashes. But this desire to save something ignores the fact that bank failures and market crashes are sometimes necessary and healthy to clear out prior excesses and dysfunctions. A crash can clean out the rot, put losses where they belong and allow the system to start over with a clean balance sheet and a strong lesson in prudence. Instead, the central bankers ride to the rescue of corrupt or mismanaged banks. This saves the wrong people (incompetent and corrupt bank managers and investors) and hurts the everyday investor or worker who watches his portfolio implode while the incompetent bank managers get to keep their jobs and big bonuses. All it does is set the stage for a bigger crisis down the road. It certainly hasn’t helped the economy. In my 2014 book, The Death of Money, I wrote, “The United States is Japan on a larger scale.” That was eight years ago. Japan started its “lost decade” in the 1990s. Now their lost decade has dragged into over three lost decades. The U.S. began its first lost decade in 2009 and is now in its second lost decade with no end in sight. The economic damage from the lockdowns certainly didn’t help. What I referred to in 2014 is that central bank policy in both countries has been completely ineffective at restoring long-term trend growth or solving the steady accumulation of unsustainable debt. In Japan this problem began in the 1990s, and in the U.S. the problem began in 2009, but it’s the same problem with no clear solution. The irony is that in the early 2000s, former Fed Chair Ben Bernanke routinely criticized the Japanese for their inability to escape from recession, deflation and slow growth. When the U.S. recession began during the global financial crisis of 2008, Bernanke promised that he would not make the same mistakes the Japanese made in the 1990s. Instead, he made every mistake the Japanese made, and the U.S. is stuck in the same place and will remain there until the Fed wakes up to its problems. Bernanke thought that low interest rates and massive money printing would lead to lending and spending that would restore trend growth to 3.2% or higher. But he ignored the role of velocity (speed of money turnover) and the unwillingness of banks to lend or individuals to borrow. When that happens, the Fed is pushing on a string — printing money with no result except asset bubbles. That’s where we are today. Regards, Jim Rickards for The Daily Reckoning P.S. I hope you saw my emergency [Countdown to Crisis Event]( yesterday. This might not shock you, but it involves the Fed. And this is serious. I believe a [massive “Dow drop” of 80% or more could take place less than 24 hours from now…]( This could be one of the biggest financial events of our lifetimes, in fact. That’s because a frightening pattern that’s taking shape now also showed up before the big stock market crash in 1987… before the dot-com bubble burst in 2000… and before the Panic of 2008. In the broadcast, I revealed [exactly how I think you should prepare for it.]( But time is running short. If you missed yesterday’s broadcast, the good news is you can still see a full replay of it, at least for now. [Go here now for immediate access.]( P.P.S. If you hear the hammering in the background at 2:58, I apologize. But this broadcast from Washington, D.C., was too urgent to bother with any sound edits. [Click Here for Your Urgent Rebroadcast]( --------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you for reading The Daily Reckoning! We greatly value your questions and comments. Please send all feedback to [feedback@dailyreckoning.com.](mailto:dr@dailyreckoning.com) [James Rickards][James G. Rickards]( is the editor of Strategic Intelligence. He is an American lawyer, economist, and investment banker with 35 years of experience working in capital markets on Wall Street. He is the author of The New York Times bestsellers Currency Wars and The Death of Money. Add feedback@dailyreckoning.com to your address book: [Whitelist us]( Additional Articles & Commentary: [Daily Reckoning Website]( Join the conversation! Follow us on social media: [Facebook]( [LinkedIn]( [Twitter]( [RSS Feed]( [YouTube]( The Daily Reckoning is committed to protecting and respecting your privacy. We do not rent or share your email address. By submitting your email address, you consent to Paradigm Press delivering daily email issues and advertisements. To end your Daily Reckoning e-mail subscription and associated external offers sent from The Daily Reckoning, feel free to [unsubscribe here.]( Please read our [Privacy Statement](. For any further comments or concerns please email us at feedback@dailyreckoning.com. If you are having trouble receiving your Daily Reckoning subscription, you can ensure its arrival in your mailbox [by whitelisting The Daily Reckoning.]( [Paradigm Press]© 2022 Paradigm Press, LLC. 808 Saint Paul Street, Baltimore MD 21202. Although our employees may answer your general customer service questions, they are not licensed under securities laws to address your particular investment situation. No communication by our employees to you should be deemed as personalized financial advice. We expressly forbid our writers from having a financial interest in any security they personally recommend to our readers. All of our employees and agents must wait 24 hours after on-line publication or 72 hours after the mailing of a printed-only publication prior to following an initial recommendation. Any investments recommended in this letter should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company. Email Reference ID: 470DRED01[.](

EDM Keywords (290)

zero year wrote wrong writers would world worker work whitelisting well website way watches watch washington wait volatility view video variable urgent unwillingness unsubscribe unlikely unemployment understand type trying topped ton tomorrow today time three thinks think take system subscription submitting stuck strategy stimulate still starting start stage squeezed spending solving sit signs sight showing shock share set serious send seeing see security saw saves save room role road reviewing result respecting rescue requires rent remain rely relationship referred recession reasoned reading readers read range questions pushing push proven protecting prospectus produce problem privacy printed prepare predicted power population plus plan place pipeline piling path panic orders options one odds occasionally note normal newsletter needed need neck much move moody money models mistakes missing might menace mean matter markets market march manipulations manipulation manipulate man make mailing mailbox magnitude made machines machine lifetimes licensed letter lending lend least learn kind keep jobs jim japanese japan issue irony involves investors inflation individuals indebted increase inadequacy inability imminent imagine ignored ides hurts hope hooks higher high helped help hear heaping healthy hate happens hammering growth go get gentlemen generated gave gap forwarded form following flames fires fight feedback fed faulty fast fact excuse example evidence even essentially escape equilibrium ensure enough engineered engage energy ended end employees election editor economy easing dysfunctions dragged determined details desire describing definition deemed decelerating decade death cut crisis crashes crash countries countdown could corrupt continue consulting consent confined company communication committed comments come collapsed clock clicking clear clean claiming chances chance certainly broadcast bother borrow biggest belong believes believe beginning began basically banks background back awesome average author attention arrival apologize announce allow air advertisements address access 80 2014 2009 2008 2000 1990s 1987 1980 10x 10

Marketing emails from dailyreckoning.com

View More
Sent On

16/10/2022

Sent On

15/10/2022

Sent On

14/10/2022

Sent On

14/10/2022

Sent On

13/10/2022

Sent On

12/10/2022

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.