Newsletter Subject

Just Another Government Lie

From

dailyreckoning.com

Email Address

dr@email.dailyreckoning.com

Sent On

Fri, Feb 4, 2022 11:02 PM

Email Preheader Text

Unmasking Today’s “Blowout” Jobs Report Were you forwarded this email? . Just Another

Unmasking Today’s “Blowout” Jobs Report Were you forwarded this email? [Sign-up to The Daily Reckoning here.]( [Unsubscribe]( [Daily Reckoning] It’s come to our attention that you might be missing out on extra benefits exclusively for The Daily Reckoning subscribers. Check out our website where you can find archives, updates, and everything else included in your subscription. You can access it by [clicking here now](. Just Another Government Lie - Economists get it wrong yet again… - Seasonal adjustments: the reality behind the numbers… - Time discovers truth… Recommended Link [Attention! Before You Read Any Further…]( Before you read any further in today’s issue, an urgent situation needs your immediate attention. If you don’t plan on claiming this new upgrade to your Strategic Intelligence subscription, you’re missing out on a huge opportunity. Right now is your chance to grab one of the biggest (and most valuable) upgrades our company has ever made to a newsletter. I’m taking Strategic Intelligence to an entirely new level and I’d hate to see you left behind. [Click Here To Claim Your Subscription Upgrade]( Annapolis, Maryland February 4, 2022 [Brian Maher]Dear Reader, On Wednesday we razzed economists for preposterously overguessing — by 481,000 — January private-sector payrolls. Today we must yank their whiskers once again. For they have mangled yet another forecast… and very nearly as badly. Only this time they erred 180 degrees the other way — to the downside. The United States Department of Labor issued the January unemployment numbers this morning. A Dow Jones survey of economists had projected a January nonfarm payroll gain of 150,000. What did today’s report reveal? Today’s report revealed a January payroll gain not of 150,000 — but of 467,000 — a 317,000 surpassing of consensus guesses. Goldman Sachs had even divined a 250,000 net job loss… a 717,000 botching. A Blowout Mr. Cliff Hodge, chief investment officer with Cornerstone Wealth, thus gushes that: The jobs report blew away expectations across the board. The headline number of 467,000 was multiples above expectations, wages came in hot and most importantly the labor force participation rate rose all during a period where Omicron cases spiked. Adds a certain Andrew Hunter — senior U.S. economist for Capital Economics: The 467,000 gain in non-farm payrolls in January is even stronger than it looks, as it came despite the spike in absenteeism driven by the Omicron virus wave… The headline gain appears to make a mockery of our fears that Omicron would weigh heavily on the payrolls figures… Just so. Yet are the blockbusting numbers truthful? Are they truly as they appear? Let us seize our sleuth’s kit. Let us step into our gumshoes. Let us hunt clues... in search of answers. But first, how did the stock market take this morning’s news? It’s All About the Fed Recall that sweet news on Main Street often goes down sour on Wall Street. And a “blowout” unemployment report would only affirm the Federal Reserve’s intentions to begin money-tightening in March. As notes Mr. Barry Gilbert, strategist with LPL Financial: For markets, the jobs report is all about the Fed, and today’s upside surprises in both job creation and wage growth keep the Fed on track to begin raising rates in March and hike four or more times this year. Recommended Link [INCOMING MESSAGE FROM JAMES ALTUCHER]( [Read more here...]( Did you know Coronavirus and inflation could have very little to do with these crazy up and down markets? And the reason your retirement account could go down to zero? I’ve been warning readers about the REAL CAUSE behind this… [I explain everything in my video—you can click the image above to play it…]( [(Watch my short video now, before it’s taken down)]( [Click Here To Watch Now]( Thus stocks opened trading today with pursed lips, ensoured. The major averages gave off winces. By late morning stocks mounted a reversal, motored ahead by favorable earnings from Amazon. The Nasdaq Composite posted a 219-point gain on the day. The S&P, a 23-point gain. The Dow Jones lost courage late this afternoon, turning in a modest 21-point loss. Yet stocks did initially recoil from the unemployment numbers — and that is precisely the point. Meantime, the 10-year Treasury yield leaped to 1.93% today. That is its highest level since August 2019… incidentally. Why So Wrong? Yet to return to today’s unemployment numbers: How did economists so badly miss their mark? Recall, consensus undershot by 317,000. Goldman Sachs men undershot by a canyoning 717,000. Today’s 467,000 figure exceeded all 78 projections. HSBC came nearest to the mark at 225,000. Yet even that represents a 242,000 underguess. Again, why the atrocious aiming — that is, why more atrocious than usual? Here is our clue: seasonal adjustments. Seasonal adjustments, as Investopedia explains them: Are intended to smooth out aberrations in certain types of financial activity. For example, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) uses seasonal adjustment to achieve a more accurate portrait of employment and unemployment levels in the United States. They do this by removing the influence of seasonal events, such as the holidays, weather events, school schedules and even the harvest period. These adjustments are estimates based on seasonal activity in previous years. “Statistics in the Wrong Hands Are a Gun in the Wrong Hands” Seasonal adjustments are intended to clarify, to distinguish signal from noise, to flatten seasonal bumps and variations. Yet in the hands of government number-torturers, they do not clarify. They put out fog. They obfuscate. A seasonal adjustment is — after all — a statistical technique. And statistics in the wrong hands are a gun in the wrong hands. The government statisticians cannot demonstrate that January witnessed 467,000 fresh payrolls. They merely infer it; 467,000 is itself a guess based upon seasonal activity in previous years. In fact, the numbers men at SouthBay Research claim "there has never been a January seasonal adjustment of this magnitude." Recommended Link [Silicon Valley insiders are delighted about WHAT?]( [Read more here...]( What if I told you… That in Silicon Valley, DONALD TRUMP will one day go down as one of the greatest Presidents of all time? Sounds crazy. [Until you see this.]( [Click Here Now]( Unadjusted Numbers What if you “unadjust” the numbers? Zero Hedge: Looking at just the December to January change we find that while the seasonally adjusted number rose by an impressive 467,000, the unadjusted number collapsed, tumbling from 150,349,000 to 147,525,000, a 2.8 million drop (as it tends to do every time the year shifts from December to January) meaning that the entire [change] in the January number — somewhere in the 3 million-plus range — is due to arbitrary adjustments overlaid on top of the data… If [you normalize] the January seasonal adjustment, the payrolls number is some 309,000 lower, or ends up being 166,000, right on top of expectations. Did you catch it?: 309,000 fewer payrolls than trumpeted! At this point the answer to what is behind the massive January beat should be becoming clear: How did a 2.8 million actual drop in jobs translate into an adjusted 467,000? If you said seasonal, COVID and population control adjustments, you are right. Time Discovers Truth We cannot verify these or any other numbers. Yet we suspect — strongly — that 467,000 is a statistical mirage, a phantom, a chimera. It is the product of a vast seasonal misadjustment. It is no more authentic than a set of false teeth, a bald man’s toupee or a congressman’s handshake. Yet we have come to expect little else in these our days. We have a vastly inauthentic stock market and a vastly inauthentic economy erected upon vastly inauthentic credit. Time discovers truth, argued the Roman philosopher Seneca so many centuries ago. We fear he was correct. But please, Lord, not in our lifetime… Regards, [Brian Maher] Brian Maher Managing Editor, The Daily Reckoning Editor’s note: America’s No.1 futurist, George Gilder, recently returned from Atlanta with an [exciting new discovery]( regarding his foundational thesis, the “Cryptocosm.” Specifically… One of George’s colleagues has uncovered a brand-new way to profit from this world-changing technology revolution. In fact, he’s identified a small handful of explosive investment speculations that he believes could soar for [life-changing profit potential]( – as soon as this upcoming week. [Click here for more...]( George was so excited about this fast-moving opportunity, that he put together a [three-minute video clip]( to explain everything. We urge you to watch it as soon as possible. It won’t take you long. And yet, it might be the most important idea you see in 2022. [Go here now.]( --------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you for reading The Daily Reckoning! We greatly value your questions and comments. Please send all feedback to [feedback@dailyreckoning.com.](mailto:dr@dailyreckoning.com) [Brian Maher][Brian Maher]( is the Daily Reckoning's Managing Editor. Before signing on to Agora Financial, he was an independent researcher and writer who covered economics, politics and international affairs. His work has appeared in the Asia Times and other news outlets around the world. He holds a Master's degree in Defense & Strategic Studies. Add feedback@dailyreckoning.com to your address book: [Whitelist us]( Additional Articles & Commentary: [Daily Reckoning Website]( Join the conversation! Follow us on social media: [Facebook]( [LinkedIn]( [Twitter]( [RSS Feed]( [YouTube]( The Daily Reckoning is committed to protecting and respecting your privacy. We do not rent or share your email address. By submitting your email address, you consent to Paradigm Press delivering daily email issues and advertisements. To end your Daily Reckoning e-mail subscription and associated external offers sent from The Daily Reckoning, feel free to [unsubscribe here.]( Please read our [Privacy Statement](. For any further comments or concerns please email us at feedback@dailyreckoning.com. If you are having trouble receiving your Daily Reckoning subscription, you can ensure its arrival in your mailbox [by whitelisting The Daily Reckoning.]( [Paradigm Press]© 2022 Paradigm Press, LLC. 808 Saint Paul Street, Baltimore MD 21202. Although our employees may answer your general customer service questions, they are not licensed under securities laws to address your particular investment situation. No communication by our employees to you should be deemed as personalized financial advice. We expressly forbid our writers from having a financial interest in any security they personally recommend to our readers. All of our employees and agents must wait 24 hours after on-line publication or 72 hours after the mailing of a printed-only publication prior to following an initial recommendation. Any investments recommended in this letter should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company. Email Reference ID: 470DRED01

Marketing emails from dailyreckoning.com

View More
Sent On

16/10/2022

Sent On

15/10/2022

Sent On

14/10/2022

Sent On

14/10/2022

Sent On

13/10/2022

Sent On

12/10/2022

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.