Newsletter Subject

The Myths of Green Energy

From

dailyreckoning.com

Email Address

dr@email.dailyreckoning.com

Sent On

Sat, Feb 27, 2021 03:34 PM

Email Preheader Text

Energy and Debt Were you forwarded this email? Congrats! A $4,005 “credit” has been applie

Energy and Debt Were you forwarded this email? [Sign-up to The Daily Reckoning here.]( [Unsubscribe]( [Daily Reckoning] The Myths of Green Energy - The one fundamental financial dynamic that governs the future… - “All future income is nothing more than a claim on future energy”… - Central banks can’t print energy… Recommended Link [A $4,005 “Credit” Has Been Applied To Your Account]( Congrats! A $4,005 “credit” has been applied to your account. [Click Here To Claim It]( San Francisco, California February 27, 2021 Editor’s note: Have you ever considered the relationship between energy and debt? Today, Charles Hugh Smith shows you why all borrowed money against future income is actually borrowed against future supplies of affordable energy — and the problem with “alternative” energy. [Charles Hugh Smith] Dear Reader, Finance is often cloaked in arcane terminology and math, but the one dynamic that governs the future is actually very simple. Here it is: All debt is borrowed against future supplies of affordable hydrocarbons (oil, coal and natural gas). Since global economic activity is ultimately dependent on a continued abundance of affordable energy, it follows that all money borrowed against future income is actually being borrowed against future supplies of affordable energy. Many people believe that alternative "green" energy will soon replace most or all hydrocarbon energy sources, but this belief is not realistic. All the "renewable" energy sources are about 3% of all energy consumed, with hydropower providing another few percent. There are unavoidable headwinds to this appealing fantasy... Reality Check 1. All "renewable" energy is actually "replaceable" energy, analyst Nate Hagens points out. Every 15-25 years (or less) much or all of the alt-energy systems and structures have to be replaced, and little of the necessary mining, manufacturing and transport can be performed with the "renewable" electricity these sources generate. Virtually all the heavy lifting of these processes require hydrocarbons and especially oil. 2. Wind and solar "renewable" energy is intermittent and therefore requires changes in behavior (no clothes dryers or electric ovens used after dark, etc.) or battery storage on a scale that isn't practical in terms of the materials required. 3. Batteries are also "replaceable" and don't last very long. The percentage of lithium-ion batteries being recycled globally is near-zero, so all batteries end up as costly, toxic landfill. 4. Battery technologies are limited by the physics of energy storage and materials. Moving whiz-bang exotic technologies from the lab to global scales of production is non-trivial. 5. The material and energy resources required to build alt-energy sources that replace hydrocarbon energy and replace all the alt-energy which has broken down or reached the end of its life exceeds the affordable reserves of materials and energy available on the planet. 6. Externalized costs of alt-energy are not being included in the cost. Nobody's adding the immense cost of the environmental damage caused by lithium mines to the price of the lithium batteries. Once the full external costs are included, the cost is no longer as affordable as promoters claim. 7. None of the so-called "green" "replaceable" energy has actually replaced hydrocarbons; all the alt-energy has done is increase total energy consumption. This is what’s called Jevons Paradox: every increase in efficiency or energy production only increases consumption. Here's a real-world example: Building another freeway doesn't actually reduce congestion in the old freeway; it simply encourages people to drive more, so both freeways are soon congested. Recommended Link [The Biggest Transfer of Wealth in History?]( [Read more here...]( He’s the man who predicted the 2008 recession… Recognized as the #1 personal finance expert in the world… Author of Rich Dad Poor Dad with 41 million copies sold… Now, he’s coming to you to reveal EXACTLY what’s going on under the nose of every American… an urgent warning to every single American… The biggest transfer of wealth in U.S. history… It’s a disturbing new movement set-off by a group of 12 unelected officials… “secretly” siphoning money from the poor and middle class to the wealthy. Unfortunately, nobody will be able to stop this new movement… Not Democrats. Not Republicans. Not Congress… Not even the president. Unfortunately, 99% of Americans don’t understand what’s going on… But today Robert Kiyosaki will blow the lid off the entire operation and help you take 5-steps to protect & grow your wealth during the coming weeks. There’s not much time... [Get All The Details Here]( All Future Income Is a Claim on Future Energy Setting aside the impracticalities of replacing most or all hydrocarbons with "replaceable" energy, the real issue is all debt service/repayment is ultimately funded by future energy. On the face of it, future income is used to pay back borrowed money, but all future income is nothing more than a claim on future energy. "Money" without access to affordable energy is worthless. Imagine being air-dropped into the Sahara desert with a backpack of gold and $100 bills. You're wealthy in terms of "money" but if there's no water, food and transport to buy with your money, you'll die. The point is that "money" is only valuable if the essentials of life are available at affordable prices. Right now the average full time wage in the U.S. is about $19/hour, and the average cost of a gallon of gasoline is $2.25. So a mere 7 minutes of (pretax) labor will buy a gallon of gasoline. But what happens if inflation increases the cost of oil but wages continue stagnating? What happens to the economy if it takes one hour of labor to buy a gallon of gasoline instead of 7 minutes? The Hidden Costs of Alternative Energy Economics claims that cheaper substitutes will appear to replace whatever is expensive, so cheap electricity will replace costly oil, or transport will switch to cheap natural gas, etc. But these proposed transitions are not cost-free. The cost of replacing 100 million internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles is non-trivial, as is building the "replaceable" energy infrastructure needed to power all these vehicles. The true costs of "replaceable" energy have been fudged by not counting external costs or replacement costs; the full lifecycle costs of "replaceable" energy are much higher than promoters are claiming. There are supply constraints that are also not included. For example, all the plastic in the world is still derived from oil, not electricity. (Note that each electric vehicle contains hundreds of pounds of plastic.) Energy in any form is not magically pliable. Just as we can't turn electricity into jet fuel, we can't turn a barrel of oil into only diesel fuel. Coal can be turned into liquid fuel but the process is non-trivial. All of which is to say that the cost of energy in hours of labor is likely to increase, possibly by more than the global economy can afford. There may also be supply constraints, situations where the energy people want and need is not available in sufficient quantities to meet demand at any price. As "software eats the world" and automation replaces costly human labor, it's also likely that the erosion in the purchasing power of labor that's been a trend for 20 years will continue and accelerate. Analyst Gail Tverberg has done an excellent job of explaining that it's not just the availability of energy that matters, it's the affordability of that energy to the bottom 90% of consumers. Recommended Link [Brown: Biggest Tech “Shock” Since 2000…]( [Read more here...]( The firm that called the EXACT PEAK of the dot-com boom has just issued another major prediction. If you’ve got money invested in the market – and especially in popular tech stocks – this is critical information for the days ahead… [Watch The Video Here]( Central Banks Can’t Print Energy Again, "money" is nothing but a claim on future energy, because energy is the foundation of the global economy. Without energy, we're all stranded in the desert and all our "money" is worthless because it can no longer buy what we need to live. Central banks can print infinite amounts of currency but they can't print energy, and so all central banks can do is add zeroes to the currency. They can't make energy more affordable, or guarantee that a day's labor will buy more than a fraction of the energy that labor can buy today. The global financial system has played a game in which "money" is either printed or borrowed into existence, on the theory that energy will be more abundant and more affordable in the future. If this theory turns out to be incorrect, the "money" used in the future to pay back debts incurred today will have near-zero value. The question is: how much energy, water and food will the "money" created out of thin air in the future buy? If the lender can only buy a tiny sliver of the energy, water and food that the "money" could have bought at the time the "money" was borrowed, then it won't really matter how many zeroes the "money" will have. What matters is how much purchasing power of essentials the "money" retains. Borrowing trillions of dollars euros, yen and yuan every year expands the claims on future energy at a rate that far exceeds the actual expansion of energy in any form. This has created an illusion that we can always create money out of thin air and it will magically hold its current purchasing power for ever greater amounts of energy, food and water. The monumental asymmetry between the staggering rate of expansion of "money" — claims on future energy — and the stagnant supply of energy means this illusion is only temporary. Regards, Charles Hugh Smith for The Daily Reckoning Editor’s note: 99% of investors out there are all pretty much the same... They plod along happy to make the market averages of about 8% per year. Maybe they’ll get lucky and score a 50% or even a 100% winner here or there. Little do they know, they could be doing better, [way better.]( If you have any doubts about this, just look at Wall Street… The “big boys” make billions. And get this... they make a lot of that money by making bigger gains trading the exact same stocks as the average investor. So what are they doing differently? Most average Americans have no idea. As a result, they get table scraps while Wall Street feasts. Well, on Wednesday, [March 3 at 4 p.m. ET]( that can change for thousands of Americans. You’ll learn all about it when you sign up here. This new initiative, [Project Lightspeed]( could well be a retirement game changer. We’re talking about back-tested gains of 484%, 624%, even 1,711%. Don’t let Wall Street hog all the mega gains. [Please, go here now to learn how you can potentially join them.]( --------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you for reading The Daily Reckoning! We greatly value your questions and comments. Please send all feedback to [feedback@dailyreckoning.com.](mailto:dr@dailyreckoning.com) [Charles Hugh Smith][Charles Hugh Smith]( is an American writer and blogger, and serves as the chief writer for the blog "Of Two Minds". Started in 2005, this site has been listed No. 7 in CNBC's top alternative financial sites, and his commentary is featured on a number of sites including Zerohedge.com, The American Conservative, and Peak Prosperity. Add feedback@dailyreckoning.com to your address book: [Whitelist us]( Additional Articles & Commentary: [Daily Reckoning Website]( Join the conversation! Follow us on social media: [Facebook]( [LinkedIn]( [Twitter]( [RSS Feed]( [YouTube]( The Daily Reckoning is committed to protecting and respecting your privacy. We do not rent or share your email address. By submitting your email address, you consent to Paradigm Press delivering daily email issues and advertisements. To end your Daily Reckoning e-mail subscription and associated external offers sent from The Daily Reckoning, feel free to [unsubscribe here.]( Please read our [Privacy Statement](. For any further comments or concerns please email us at [feedback@dailyreckoning.com](mailto:feedbackdailyproof@dailyreckoning.com). If you are having trouble receiving your Daily Reckoning subscription, you can ensure its arrival in your mailbox [by whitelisting The Daily Reckoning.]( [Paradigm Press]© 2021 Paradigm Press, LLC. 808 Saint Paul Street, Baltimore MD 21202. Although our employees may answer your general customer service questions, they are not licensed under securities laws to address your particular investment situation. No communication by our employees to you should be deemed as personalized financial advice. We expressly forbid our writers from having a financial interest in any security they personally recommend to our readers. All of our employees and agents must wait 24 hours after on-line publication or 72 hours after the mailing of a printed-only publication prior to following an initial recommendation. Any investments recommended in this letter should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company. Email Reference ID: 470DRED01

EDM Keywords (222)

writers worthless world whitelisting wealthy wealth water video vehicles valuable used unsubscribe understand turned turn trend transport time thousands theory thank terms talking switch submitting structures stranded stop stocks site simple sign share serves security score scale say reviewing result respecting republicans replacing replaced replace rent relationship realistic reading readers reached rate questions question protecting prospectus promoters production process problem privacy printed price predicted practical power pounds poor point played plastic physics performed percentage percent oil number nothing note nose need myths money matters math materials material market man make mailing mailbox made lot look longer long little listed limited likely life lid licensed letter lender learn last labor lab know investors intermittent incorrect included impracticalities illusion idea hydrocarbons hours history help happens guarantee group governs gold going get gasoline game gallon future fudged freeways fraction foundation forwarded form food follows following firm feedback featured face explaining expensive expansion existence example exact even et essentials especially erosion ensure energy end employees efficiency economy drive doubts done differently die details desert democrats deemed debt day currency created could cost continue consulting consent congress communication committed comments commentary coming cnbc claims claiming claim change called buy building broken bought borrowed blow blogger blog belief behavior barrel backpack available availability arrival applied appear americans also affordable affordability afford advertisements address adding actually abundant able 50 2005

Marketing emails from dailyreckoning.com

View More
Sent On

16/10/2022

Sent On

15/10/2022

Sent On

14/10/2022

Sent On

14/10/2022

Sent On

13/10/2022

Sent On

12/10/2022

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.