Newsletter Subject

The secret to successful investing in one quote

From

curzioresearch.com

Email Address

support@curzioresearch.com

Sent On

Mon, Aug 9, 2021 09:08 PM

Email Preheader Text

What Peter Lynch can teach us about picking stocks. I started investing when I was 18. I retired fro

What Peter Lynch can teach us about picking stocks. [Curzio Research] The secret to successful investing in one quote "Never invest in any idea you can't illustrate with a crayon." – Peter Lynch Peter Lynch is one of the greatest investors of all time. He became famous while running Fidelity's Magellan Fund from 1977 to 1990. During his time at the helm, he averaged an astonishing 29.2% annualized return. To put this into perspective, the average annual return for the S&P 500 is around 10%. So yeah, he nearly tripled the market's performance over a 13-year timeframe. That's "G.O.A.T." status if you ask me. The quote above is one of my favorites. It resonates with my own philosophy on investing. But it took me years to learn the importance of focusing on simple investment ideas. Whether you're an experienced investor or just a beginner, it's a valuable lesson that will help you appreciate great businesses... and avoid many of the worst stocks. [How I retired from Wall Street at 31 using a very simple strategy]( [[View Report]]( I started investing when I was 18. I retired from Wall Street when I was 31. I tried lots of different techniques and strategies... Then I figured something out. Something BIG. [Let me show it to you]( Businesses you can illustrate with a crayon When I first started investing, I thought complicated equaled good. I bought stocks based on hype about how a company was "going to change the world" with some complex, new technology. As a beginning investor, I didn't know any better. But after losing money repeatedly, I began to question the validity of hard-to-understand stocks. Instead, I began focusing on companies that were easy to comprehend. Basically—similar to Lynch's idea of illustrating an idea with a crayon—if I couldn't explain what a company did to my mom... I passed on the stock. I began to focus on businesses that made great products and had solid fundamentals, like growing sales and earnings. I even studied some of the best-performing stocks of all time. To my amazement, most of them were quite easy to understand... like Coca-Cola and McDonald's, for example. And there are plenty more recent examples to consider, like Starbucks (SBUX): Making and selling coffee is a simple, straightforward business that anyone can understand. Of course, it helps that people are obsessed with those $5 lattes... myself included. Not surprisingly, the stock has been an absolute stud since the company went public in 1992. And it's been a monster Big Money magnet—continuing to garner support from institutional investors over the past decade. Have a look: First, notice all the blue bars. Those are days when the stock ramped in price on big trading volume. That tells us institutional investors were buying. Then, see how the chart is going up over time... which means there's a solid uptrend for us to ride. I grabbed shares myself years ago based on the simplicity of Starbucks' business. And I'm glad I did. Another example is Visa (V). Visa doesn't issue credit cards or worry about extending credit to people... instead, it focuses on running the network that lets folks use their cards. I like to think of the business as a tollbooth... it collects a small fee each time a card is swiped. Today, it operates a massive payment network in over 200 countries around the world... and accounts for about half of the total purchase volume on credit cards. Last year, the company raked in nearly $22 billion in revenue... and kept almost half of that number as profits ($10.9 billion). Let's take a look at Visa's long-term chart: Again, those blue bars are Big Money buy signals... and the more, the better. That's the stairway to heaven, baby. I bought shares of Visa in 2017 and as you can see, the stock has continued its steady rise. Starbucks and Visa exemplify Peter Lynch's preference for simple businesses. Both have become massive, worldwide enterprises with thousands of employees. But at their core, they're both easy-to-understand businesses that can be illustrated with a crayon. Avoid these complex stocks Every industry has its share of complex, overhyped players. But the easiest example of a bad investment is specialty purpose acquisition companies (SPACs). In short, SPACs are "shell companies" that raise money from investors in order to purchase a private company. It's a way for a private company to go public while avoiding the traditional IPO route. I traded SPACs during my career on Wall Street. We referred to them as "blank check companies." That's because the idea of a SPAC is investors entrust their money with sponsors—the SPAC's management team—looking to acquire an early-stage business. Try explaining that with a crayon. SPACs are difficult to understand... and their fee structures are often complex. [This "insider" strategy could’ve 3x’d your money]( [[View Report]]( Main Street investors all over the country are routinely 2x'ing—and even 3x'ing—their money with a weirdly simple "insider" strategy... That gives retail investors the same edge Wall Street hotshots have. [Start supercharging your gains with this strategy now]( But an even bigger reason to stay away from SPACs is their historical performance. A [study released by Renaissance Capital]( last year revealed that since the start of 2015, only about 30% of SPACs completed a merger or took a company public. In other words, about 70% of SPACs never followed through with their acquisition plan, which means the IPO proceeds were liquidated and shareholders received their pro rata amount. Of the 30% that completed their goal, their shares had an average loss of 9.6% and a median return of -29.1%. These results are especially terrible considering the average aftermarket return is 47.1% for traditional IPOs since 2015. As you can see, these complicated investment vehicles are trouble for investors. They're a perfect example of the kind of complexity you should avoid. Peter Lynch said to never invest in any idea you can't illustrate with a crayon. And I agree: Many of the best-performing stocks are easy to understand, like Starbucks and Visa. If you don't understand a business... you should be skeptical. SPACs left a sour taste in my mouth years ago. I've stayed away from them ever since. And the historical data shows they tend to underperform the rest of the stock market. Peter Lynch has plenty of other amazing quotes. Check out my latest [Lessons With Luke video]( where I go over my top 10 Peter Lynch quotes. Luke DowneyEditor, The Big Money Report P.S. When it comes to investing, simple is better... And it's the central philosophy behind The Big Money Report: We buy companies with great businesses... growing profits... and that are Big Money magnets. This strategy made me wealthy enough to retire from Wall Street at 31 years old... [Let me help you do the same](. FOLLOW US [Facebook]( [Twitter]( [LinkedIn]( [Youtube]( This email was sent to {EMAIL} as part of you subscription to Genia Turanova's Commentary. No longer want to receive these emails? [Customize your inbox]( Curzio Research, 1886 S 14th Street, Suite 4, Fernandina Beach, FL 32034, United States Copyright © 2021 Curzio Research. All Rights Reserved. [-](

Marketing emails from curzioresearch.com

View More
Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

04/12/2024

Sent On

10/11/2024

Sent On

08/11/2024

Sent On

07/11/2024

Sent On

06/11/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.