Newsletter Subject

Twenty-Percent Gains in Three Months — Did You Capture Them?

From

crowdability.com

Email Address

newsletter@exct.moneyballeconomics.com

Sent On

Tue, Feb 20, 2024 07:01 PM

Email Preheader Text

Late last year, I recommended a specific defense company. And if you took my advice, you’re alr

Late last year, I recommended a specific defense company. And if you took my advice, you’re already sitting on gains of about 20%. But don’t worry if you missed out… There are still opportunities for you to profit here. For a transcript of this video, see below. This transcript has been lightly edited for length […] You’re receiving this email as part of your subscription to Andrew Zatlin’s Moneyball Daily [Unsubscribe]( [Moneyball Daily] Twenty-Percent Gains in Three Months — Did You Capture Them? February 20, 2024 Late last year, I recommended a specific defense company. And if you took my advice, you’re already sitting on gains of about 20%. But don’t worry if you missed out… There are still opportunities for you to profit here. [CLICK HERE TO LAUNCH VIDEO OR READ THE FULL TRANSCRIPT BELOW »»]( For a transcript of this video, see below. This transcript has been lightly edited for length and clarity. Twenty-Percent Gains in Three Months — Did You Capture Them? The International Institute for Strategic Studies just released its 65th annual report on global military-spending. OK, it’s not exactly a page-turner. But it did reveal that defense-spending soared to a new high — $2.2 trillion last year. That’s a $200 billion increase from 2022. Experts believe this level of spending is going to continue throughout 2024. In fact, it may even set another record. The question for investors like us is: how do we profit from all this spending? The Need for Military Spending Across the world, military spending makes sense. After all, much of the world is locked in conflict. Russia and Ukraine continue to wage war. Flareups are dotting Africa and the Middle East. And China is increasing its aggression toward its closest neighbors (Taiwan and Japan, for example), prompting them to ramp up military spending. All this turmoil is creating tens of billions of dollars in revenue for U.S. weapon makers. Why? Because 40% of global military-spending goes to U.S. companies. And another 17% goes to members of NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization). Essentially, close to 60% of military spending ends up in the West. And as I pointed out, this spending doesn’t appear to be slowing down. Now, at first blush, you’d expect that this historic spending would be fantastic news for defense companies… And that the increase in revenue would undoubtedly be translating to a rise in these companies’ stock prices. Not so fast… Spending is Up, But Prices are Down Take a look at the recent stock performance of a few notable defense companies. First, there’s Lockheed Martin (LMT): Next, there’s RTX, formerly Raytheon Technologies (RTX): Then there’s Northrop Grumman (NOC): All three companies’ stock prices are lower today than they were a year ago. What’s going on here? I’ll answer that question in a moment… But let me be clear that this isn’t the case for all defense companies. In fact, Huntington Ingalls Industries (HII), the largest military-shipbuilding company in the U.S., has been on a tear lately: This company may sound familiar to you. We recommended it in early December. And since then, its stock is up about 20%. So, what separates HII from the others? It’s All About the Hiring The answer is hiring activity. Take a look: In recent months, Huntington’s hiring has ramped up significantly. But as you’ll see, that hasn’t been the case for some of its competitors. For example: Hiring at Northrop Grumman is down. And it’s a similar trend at Lockheed Martin: I want to focus on Lockheed’s situation for a moment… Put This on Your Radar If you notice, hiring at Lockheed trended up last summer very briefly, before continuing to fall to close out the year. Last fall, Congress was preparing to vote on a new spending package for Ukraine. And Lockheed was anticipating this new package being passed, and a flood of new contracts and revenues to come pouring in. The thing is, that spending package never saw the light of day. So the wind was taken out of Lockheed’s sails, and hiring dropped to end the year. If there’s a bright side, it’s that Lockheed’s hiring appears to have flattened out. Yes, hiring isn’t booming at the company. But it’s leveled off, showing signs that a turnaround might not be far behind. Lockheed is the maker of the HIMARS rocket launcher, a popular piece of equipment sought by foreign militaries. The company recently announced that it’s ramping up production of this launcher. And this could be the type of announcement that puts this stock back on our radar. In the meantime, let’s continue to let hiring-data guide our way. In it to win it, Zatlin out. In it to win it, [Andrew Zatlin] Andrew Zatlin Moneyball Economics Copyright 2024 © Moneyball Economics, All rights reserved. You signed up on []( Our mailing address is: Moneyball Economics 1125 N. Charles Street Baltimore, Maryland 21201 [Update Subscription Preferences]( | [Unsubscribe from this list]( | [Terms & Privacy]( RISK NOTICE: All investing comes with risk. That includes the investments teased in this letter. You should never invest more than you can afford to lose. Please use this research for the purpose that it's intended — as research only. You should consult a professional financial advisor before ever taking a position in any securities you see herein. DISCLAIMERS: The work included in this communication is based on diverse sources including SEC filings, current events, interviews, corporate press releases, and information published on funding platforms, but the views we express and the conclusions we reach are our own. As such, this content may contain errors, and any investments described in this content should be made only after reviewing the filings and/or financial statements of the company, and only after consulting with your investment advisor. Actual results may differ significantly from the results described herein. Furthermore, nothing published by Moneyball Economics, Inc should be considered personalized financial advice. Although our employees may answer your general customer service questions, they are not licensed under securities laws to address your particular investment situation. No communication by our employees to you should be deemed as personalized investment advice. Moneyball Economics is an independent provider of education, information and research on publicly traded companies, and as such, it accepts no direct or indirect compensation from any companies or third parties mentioned in any of our letters, reports or updates

Marketing emails from crowdability.com

View More
Sent On

13/05/2024

Sent On

10/05/2024

Sent On

08/05/2024

Sent On

06/05/2024

Sent On

03/05/2024

Sent On

01/05/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.