Newsletter Subject

Fake Videos, Real Profits

From

crowdability.com

Email Address

newsletter@exct.moneyballeconomics.com

Sent On

Wed, Feb 14, 2024 05:01 PM

Email Preheader Text

Did you watch the Super Bowl? It was a fascinating experience — and I’m not just talking a

Did you watch the Super Bowl? It was a fascinating experience — and I’m not just talking about the overtime thriller on the field. You see, an emerging technology was featured heavily in some of the fan-favorite commercials… And this technology could lead us to our next great profit opportunity. For a transcript of this […] You’re receiving this email as part of your subscription to Andrew Zatlin’s Moneyball Daily [Unsubscribe]( [Moneyball Daily] Fake Videos, Real Profits February 14, 2024 Did you watch the Super Bowl? It was a fascinating experience — and I’m not just talking about the overtime thriller on the field. You see, an emerging technology was featured heavily in some of the fan-favorite commercials… And this technology could lead us to our next great profit opportunity. [CLICK HERE TO LAUNCH VIDEO OR READ THE FULL TRANSCRIPT BELOW »»]( For a transcript of this video, see below. This transcript has been lightly edited for length and clarity. Fake Videos, Real Profits Super Bowl 58 is in the books. And man, what an event! The game… the snacks… the halftime show — it was all amazing. And I haven’t even mentioned the commercials. Some viewers tune into the Super Bowl simply for the advertisements. Companies spend millions of dollars to capture 30 seconds of your attention in hopes of selling you everything from cars and beer to potato chips. This year’s commercials were no different — well, except for one thing. You see, a fast-growing technology was on display during Sunday’s commercials. Did you notice it? When Content Gets Manipulated It’s a technology centered around digital manipulation… More specifically, how a person’s actions, or even their words, can be digitally altered to seem real. You’ve probably seen this technology used before — even during Super Bowl commercials. Recognize this baby? In 2008, the investment-trading platform E*Trade ran a commercial featuring a toddler who spoke with the clarity and maturity of an adult. He would encourage viewers to invest using E*Trade — part of the schtick being that investing through this company was so easy, a baby could do it. Obviously, we didn’t believe this baby was really the one talking. But his mouth sure moved like he was. This was an example of digital manipulation, or what’s being commonly referred to as “deep-fake” technology. (By the way, this ad campaign was a major hit, and talking toddlers have been used by E*Trade in subsequent commercials, even one that ran during last weekend’s Super Bowl.) Using deep-fake technology to advertise an investment platform via a talking baby is relatively harmless — meant mostly for entertainment. But what happens when this technology stops being used for fun and games? When Deep-Fakes Become Dangerous Last week, Iranians hacked into a United Arab Emirates news broadcast. And they made it seem as though the reporter was talking about Gaza. The thing is, he wasn’t. The hackers presented fake pictures of Gaza to accompany this phony report, all with the intent to stoke the flames of their political cause. This isn’t a new tactic. In fact, the Soviets have long since manipulated media by removing unwanted people from certain photos. Israel often accuses Palestinians of using Hollywood-quality staging (what it calls “Pallywood”) to create fake content… And here in the U.S., we’re increasingly seeing the technology used to create phony political ads. This is a topic that’s of particular importance as we gear up for one of the most controversial Presidential elections in recent memory. Deep-Faking Political Ads When you see an ad endorsing a political candidate, or even presented to you by the candidate themselves, you assume it’s legitimate, right? Thirty years ago, that was a safe assumption. These days? Not so fast… In 2017, after Donald Trump was elected, he faced scrutiny over the Steele dossier, a report that alleged Trump had close ties with Russia. Seven years later, Trump is still fighting those accusations, despite the report being completely fake. It’s one thing when potential voters get duped by a deep-fake advertisement. But it’s another when entire businesses fall victim… A $25 Million Mistake Earlier this year, a finance worker at a multinational firm was tricked into paying out $25 million to fraudsters. How did they trick the employee? You guessed it: deep-fake technology. The worker was asked to attend a video call with the company’s Chief Financial Officer and other staff. The CFO looked and sounded like himself. But it wasn’t him. And the other staff members on the call — members that the worker recognized — were actually deep-fake re-creations. On the call, the “CFO” requested that the worker release $25 million, which they did. In the end, the bad actors walked away with a small fortune. It’s a scary example, one that may not hit too close to home. But what happens if a loved one calls you asking for financial help — someone who sounds just like your family member, but is really a cyber-criminal? It could happen… More to Come... That’s why I’m bullish on defensive measures for this type of fraudulent technology. It’ll be something I like to call “cyber-media security.” I’m not exactly sure how it will work yet. But companies will undoubtedly invest in hardware and software designed to verify faces and voices. That might be good news for businesses like Cisco or CrowdStrike. Perhaps consumer-facing companies like Apple and Adobe will release tools that help you know for sure that the content you’re seeing or experiencing is legitimate. Bottom line: we’re in the earliest stages of defending ourselves from deep-fake technology. And as I uncover more about this topic, you can be sure I’ll come to you with more videos — more legitimate videos, that is. Until then, we’re in it to win it. Zatlin out. In it to win it, [Andrew Zatlin] Andrew Zatlin Moneyball Economics Copyright 2024 © Moneyball Economics, All rights reserved. You signed up on []( Our mailing address is: Moneyball Economics 1125 N. Charles Street Baltimore, Maryland 21201 [Update Subscription Preferences]( | [Unsubscribe from this list]( | [Terms & Privacy]( RISK NOTICE: All investing comes with risk. That includes the investments teased in this letter. You should never invest more than you can afford to lose. Please use this research for the purpose that it's intended — as research only. You should consult a professional financial advisor before ever taking a position in any securities you see herein. DISCLAIMERS: The work included in this communication is based on diverse sources including SEC filings, current events, interviews, corporate press releases, and information published on funding platforms, but the views we express and the conclusions we reach are our own. As such, this content may contain errors, and any investments described in this content should be made only after reviewing the filings and/or financial statements of the company, and only after consulting with your investment advisor. Actual results may differ significantly from the results described herein. Furthermore, nothing published by Moneyball Economics, Inc should be considered personalized financial advice. Although our employees may answer your general customer service questions, they are not licensed under securities laws to address your particular investment situation. No communication by our employees to you should be deemed as personalized investment advice. Moneyball Economics is an independent provider of education, information and research on publicly traded companies, and as such, it accepts no direct or indirect compensation from any companies or third parties mentioned in any of our letters, reports or updates

Marketing emails from crowdability.com

View More
Sent On

13/05/2024

Sent On

10/05/2024

Sent On

08/05/2024

Sent On

06/05/2024

Sent On

03/05/2024

Sent On

01/05/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.