Newsletter Subject

How To Avoid “Market Whiplash”

From

crowdability.com

Email Address

newsletter@mb.crowdability.com

Sent On

Wed, Jul 10, 2024 03:00 PM

Email Preheader Text

Being an investor can give you whiplash. Just yesterday, it seemed like you had a perfect investment

Being an investor can give you whiplash. Just yesterday, it seemed like you had a perfect investment plan. But today, a talking head on CNBC is preaching about how wrong your strategy is. So, should you stick with your Magnificent Seven stocks, your QQQ, your 60/40 portfolio, or whichever plan you decided on in the […] You're receiving this email as part of your subscription to Crowdability. [Unsubscribe here](. [Crowdability Editorial]( [feature] How To Avoid “Market Whiplash” Matthew Milner Being an investor can give you whiplash. Just yesterday, it seemed like you had a perfect investment plan. But today, a talking head on CNBC is preaching about how wrong your strategy is. So, should you stick with your Magnificent Seven stocks, your QQQ, your 60/40 portfolio, or whichever plan you decided on in the past? Or should you dump everything and buy bitcoin and gold, or jump on the AI bandwagon, or only invest in private startups? Too bad there’s not a better roadmap — a way to invest that won’t make you feel like a chicken running around with his head chopped off. Actually, there is a better roadmap. And we can uncover it by looking at how two successful investors navigated a time of great uncertainty: the dot-com boom and bust. Destroying Value! “Value is destroyed, not created, by any business that loses money over its lifetime.” This quote is from Warren Buffett. He was discussing his rationale for avoiding money-losing dot-coms during the late 90s. At the time, everyone on the planet seemed to be pouring money into these companies. Buffett’s avoidance of these stocks led many to dismiss him, and his investing framework, as outdated. After all, professional and amateur investors alike were making fortunes from this trend. It seemed Buffett was missing out. But Warren ended up doing just fine — in fact, better than fine. He’s still one of the Top 10 wealthiest people in the world, with a net worth of over $100 billion. Does that mean he was right and everyone else was wrong? To explore this question, let’s look at a tech investor named Fred Wilson. Tech Investors Have Done Well, Too Fred is the co-founder of Union Square Ventures, one of the world’s most successful venture-capital firms. He invested in money-losing startups like Twitter, Zynga, and Etsy at their earliest stages — and profited massively as they grew to become multi-billion-dollar public companies. He tends to look at companies and investments differently than Buffett. For example, things like profits (or lack thereof) don’t necessarily concern him. More than ten years ago, he wrote a [timeless post on his blog]( that sums up his thinking about how he sees businesses and investments over the long term. In the post, Fred talks about publicly-traded companies that are currently losing money, but still command multi-billion-dollar market caps. Fred argues that these losses are intentional. After all, he says, the company’s managers could turn those losses into profits at any time. All they’d need to do is invest less in future growth. Startups are essentially doing the same thing. They’re not losing money, per se. They’re simply making an investment in their future. Does this mean Fred is right? Is the road to riches paved with profitless tech companies? Here’s What You Should Do These are two very different schools of thought when it comes to investing. But instead of looking at what makes them different, let’s look at what they have in common. Long-Term Thinkers Both Buffett and Wilson take a long-term view of their investments. Buffett is clearly unmoved by the pundits on CNBC. He’s been using the same investment strategy for decades, and has been through multiple market cycles. The internet trend didn’t phase him at all; he stuck to the plan he’d always had without feeling he was missing out. Same with Fred. After the dot-com meltdown, many “tech investors” suddenly had zero interest in tech companies. But Fred believed in the power of technology and its ability to change the word — maybe not right away, but certainly over time. He kept right on investing in new tech startups, and he’s continued to have enormous success. Invest in What You Know Buffett has often said he doesn’t avoid tech stocks because he thinks they’re inherently “risky.” He just thinks they’re risky for him because he doesn’t know enough about tech. What he knows about is insurance, consumer goods, and finance — which explains his investments in companies like Coca-Cola, Goldman Sachs, and Geico. Fred, on the other hand, has been an early-stage technology investor his entire career. And before he was a venture capitalist, Fred attended MIT where he studied Mechanical Engineering. Technology is in his DNA. It’s what he knows, which explains why this is where he invests. Frameworks Warren and Fred don’t throw darts at the wall to pick their investments. They create an investing framework — a filter. By putting a potential investment through their filter, they can determine its merit. Buffett’s framework, for example, involves looking for companies in specific industries, trading at prices that denote “value.” Wilson’s framework involves getting into certain types of technology companies very early — companies that can gain “network effects,” for example, where the value of a product increases as more and more people use it. Think Facebook, or Twitter, or social games. Without a stable framework, it’s doubtful that either investor would be as successful as they are today. Play the Long-Hand To wrap things up, let’s look at how this relates to what we do here at Crowdability. Investing in private startups has become very popular recently. Makes sense. According to Cambridge Associates, over the last 25 years, startups have returned an average of 55% per year. That’s about 10x higher than the stock market. And if you get into startups like Uber or Facebook or Airbnb… well, you could turn a few hundred dollars into millions. But if you jump into startup investing because it’s “trendy,” you might lose the confidence to stick around when the waters get choppy. Keep in mind: sailing through choppy waters is one of the hallmarks of both Buffett and Wilson. They play the long-hand. And this steadfastness is what’s led them to create vast wealth. To be the most successful startup investor you can be, follow the time-worn lessons of by Buffett and Wilson: Think in terms of years, not months. Stick to industries you know or can understand. And have a framework that you can apply consistently. We can help you create a framework in our free report: The [10 Crowdfunding Commandments »]( If you haven’t already read it, dive in today! Happy Investing. Best Regards, [Matthew Milner] Matthew Milner Founder Crowdability.com [Click Here to Leave a Comment for Matthew »]( [related] - [This App Can Turn You Into a Spy]( - [Turning Point: Scientists Discover Obesity Gene]( - [This Laptop Has No Screen]( - [Wait a Minute — Stuff is Getting Cheaper?]( - [The Weirdest Job Listing You’ll Ever See]( [related] - [How To Make a Million Dollars from a Napkin]( - [The Mona Lisa is Ready to See You Sweat]( - [How a Formula 1 Driver Consistently Beat the S&P by 117%]( - [Can You Afford to Retire? This Can Help]( - [Forget Stocks — Invest in Legos for $500,000 in Profits]( [watch] [About Crowdability]( About Crowdability What is Crowdability, and how can we help you? Watch this two-minute video to find out... [Click here to watch »]( [try our premium products] [ESP]( [Early Stage Playbook]( An in-depth video series that helps you master the proven process used by industry professionals to build a portfolio of early-stage "start-ups." [CIQ]( [Crowdability IQ]( An easy-to-use “stock screener” that quickly helps you identify the most promising early-stage start-ups to invest in. [PMP]( [Private Market Profits]( The world’s first investment research service that provides individual investors with private market opportunities offering significant upside potential. [IUN]( [Income Unlimited]( The first research service in the world to provide individual investors with high-yielding income-generation opportunities from the private market. Copyright © 2024 Crowdability, a division of Paradigm Press, LLC., All rights reserved. You signed up on []( [Add us to your address book]( Our mailing address is: Crowdability, a division of Paradigm Press, LLC. 1001 Cathedral Street Baltimore, Maryland 21201 [Update Subscription Preferences]( | [Unsubscribe from this list](

Marketing emails from crowdability.com

View More
Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

08/11/2024

Sent On

04/11/2024

Sent On

01/11/2024

Sent On

25/10/2024

Sent On

21/10/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.