Newsletter Subject

Debate fairness under scrutiny: a deeper look into the Trump vs Harris showdown

From

civildeadline.com

Email Address

mail@civildeadline.com

Sent On

Sat, Sep 28, 2024 09:39 AM

Email Preheader Text

Took the mask right off. Presidential debates have always been high-stakes affairs, but the latest A

[Logo]( [ABC Moderator's Shocking Admission on Trump Fact-Check] [ABC Moderator's Shocking Admission on Trump Fact-Check]( Took the mask right off. Presidential debates have always been high-stakes affairs, but the latest ABC News debate has drawn sharp criticism, particularly from conservatives and some independent voices. What could have been an even-handed event quickly devolved into what many saw as a coordinated attack against GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump, with both the moderators and Democrat presidential nominee Kamala Harris piling on in ways that raised eyebrows across the political spectrum. Let's break it down. One of the core criticisms leveled at the moderators revolves around fact-checking - or rather, selective fact-checking. Trump, known for his sharp and confrontational style, was repeatedly fact-checked during the debate. However, many of these fact-checks turned out to be flawed or outright false, casting doubt on the impartiality of the moderators. [Even more concerning was the abrupt rule change]( regarding microphone muting, which was apparently instituted just 30 minutes before the debate - and suspiciously aligned with a demand from the Harris campaign. To top it off, Harris was seemingly encouraged to join in on the critique of Trump, making the event feel more like a coordinated attack than a fair debate. I said the reason for how the moderators behaved in the ABC debate was simply because they were not going to let happen to Kamala Harris, what happened to Joe Biden and here she is admitting it[( [pic.twitter.com/x48TIQrz18]( - Stephen L. Miller (@redsteeze) [September 12, 2024]( At the center of the storm is Linsey Davis, one of the co-moderators, who became a lightning rod for criticism after falsely fact-checking Trump on abortion. Rather than facing accountability for this misstep, Davis received glowing coverage from mainstream outlets like the LA Times, which published a piece praising her "fairness and balance." But this narrative took a strange turn when Davis, during an interview with the Times, made a comment that many conservatives saw as a blatant admission of bias. She stated that the moderators' aggressive fact-checking of Trump was a response to the June CNN debate where Biden's poor performance led to his exit from the race. The implication was clear: they didn't want Harris to suffer the same fate as Biden. In essence, Davis openly acknowledged that the moderators were keen to avoid a repeat of the CNN debacle, where Trump's performance and Biden's failure to defend himself hastened the latter's departure from the race. Her remarks suggest that the moderators took an overly aggressive stance against Trump to shield Harris from a similar political downfall. This admission is hardly surprising to Trump's supporters, who have long claimed that the debates are rigged against Republican candidates. Trump himself predicted the outcome, declaring ahead of time that there would be no more presidential debates after this one, calling out the bias he and his supporters have come to expect. The fallout from Davis' comments has been strangely muted. There's no uproar from mainstream media, no calls for reform, and certainly no soul-searching from ABC News or Disney, the network's parent company. It's worth noting that the upper echelons of ABC News have cozy ties with Kamala Harris - one exec is even credited with introducing Harris to her now-husband, Doug Emhoff. Connections like this only fuel the perception that the debate stage is rigged, leaving voters wondering if fairness is still a priority in these high-profile political showdowns. [Gross 'Swifties' Are Now Bullying QB's Wife Over Trump] [Gross 'Swifties' Are Now Bullying QB's Wife Over Trump]( So cyberbullying is ok now? [Ohio Governor Brings In The Calvary To Help Springfield] [Ohio Governor Brings In The Calvary To Help Springfield]( It's about time. [Watch: Kamala & Biden Have To Stand Their As Trump Gets Cheered] [Watch: Kamala & Biden Have To Stand Their As Trump Gets Cheered]( Bwhahaha [Kamala Caught Copy & Pasting 'Ideas'] [Kamala Caught Copy & Pasting 'Ideas']( They really aren't that smart are they? [Taylor Swift Political Announcement Had Some Interesting Timing] [Taylor Swift Political Announcement Had Some Interesting Timing]( Well isn't this a coincidence. You are receiving this email because you opted in to Civil Deadline daily newsletter. Copyright 2024. Civil Deadline. All rights reserved. 30 N. Gould St, Suite 6911, Sheridan, WY 82801 [UNSUBSCRIBE]( | [VIEW IN BROWSER]( | [PRIVACY POLICY](

Marketing emails from civildeadline.com

View More
Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

05/12/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.