Newsletter Subject

'a little blood'

From

citizen.org

Email Address

action@citizen.org

Sent On

Fri, Mar 8, 2024 12:46 AM

Email Preheader Text

The right to vote is increasingly under attack in America. Here’s what I’m talking about:

The right to vote is increasingly under attack in America. Here’s what I’m talking about: - The landmark Voting Rights Act of 1965 contained a provision requiring states with histories of voter suppression to get federal approval (or “preclearance”) for any changes to their voting laws. - Congress reauthorized the Voting Rights Act, including the preclearance provision, in 1982 and again in 2006 with overwhelmingly bipartisan support. Indeed, not a single senator — Democrat or Republican — voted against reauthorization in 2006. - But in 2013 — in a case known as Shelby County — the Supreme Court struck down the preclearance provision of the Voting Rights Act. - The court’s majority based its ruling on the farcical premise that racism was essentially a thing of the past. - The impact of the Supreme Court’s misguided Shelby County ruling has proved to be every bit as cynical, discriminatory, and anti-democratic as many of us predicted it would be. - In the decade since, Republican legislators across the country have imposed barriers to voting, barely concealing their intent to deter people of color from voting. - Nearly 100 laws have already been passed, in more than half of the states, that make it harder for people of color to vote. Hundreds of other voter suppression bills have been introduced in virtually every state in America. - And — as revealed in a massive new study by the Brennan Center for Justice — after Shelby County, the gap between higher voting rates among white people and lower voting rates among people of color has increased the most in places that had been subject to the preclearance provision. Legislation to restore and strengthen the original Voting Rights Act, including its preclearance requirement, has just been reintroduced in Congress. This critical legislation — the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act — is named in honor of the late Rep. John Lewis. On March 7, 1965 — in what is known as Bloody Sunday — Lewis was savagely beaten by racist state troopers as he led peaceful civil rights activists in a historic march across the Edmund Pettus Bridge in Selma, Alabama. The Voting Rights Act, with its critical preclearance requirement, was passed just five months later. A few years ago, I had the honor to be at the House of Representatives when John Lewis spoke about legislation to protect voting rights: “You have heard me say on occasion that the right to vote is precious — almost sacred. In a democratic society, it is the most powerful nonviolent tool we have. In my heart of hearts, I believe we have a moral responsibility to restore access for all citizens, who desire to participate in the democratic process. Many people marched and protested for the right to vote. Some gave a little blood, and others gave their very lives.” The John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act would fortify the original Voting Rights Act of 1965, including by restoring the requirement that jurisdictions with histories of voter suppression get federal approval for any changes to their voting laws. [Tell Congress:]( [The fundamental right to vote is under assault. We call on Congress to protect and expand voting rights by passing the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act.]( [Click to add your name now.]( Thanks for taking action. For democracy, - Robert Weissman, President of Public Citizen Public Citizen | 1600 20th Street NW | Washington DC 20009 | [Unsubscribe]( [supporter]

Marketing emails from citizen.org

View More
Sent On

05/12/2024

Sent On

04/12/2024

Sent On

02/12/2024

Sent On

10/11/2024

Sent On

08/11/2024

Sent On

07/11/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.