Newsletter Subject

a blow to every consumer in America

From

citizen.org

Email Address

action@citizen.org

Sent On

Tue, Nov 15, 2022 07:01 PM

Email Preheader Text

This may not have made your local news, but American consumers took what could be a major hit last m

This may not have made your local news, but American consumers took what could be a major hit last month. The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals* ruled — wrongly — that the funding structure of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is unconstitutional. Some history: - The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) was created as part of the landmark Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 — after the Big Banks’ reckless greed sparked the Great Recession. - The agency was initially proposed by Elizabeth Warren, then a Harvard professor and now a U.S. senator. - Public Citizen was instrumental in pushing for the creation of the CFPB. - That included an insistence that the agency be funded independently of Congress’ annual appropriations circus — which is far too susceptible to lobbying and campaign cash from Wall Street and other deep-pocketed financial enterprises. - Congress agreed, and intentionally set up the CFPB to be funded through the Federal Reserve, rather than via annual congressional appropriations. - And for over a decade, the CFPB has been working exactly as intended — recovering billions for everyday American consumers and restricting some of the worst impulses of financial companies. - But then a trade group for predatory payday lenders came along and challenged the very structure of the CFPB — even though that structure is intentional and was approved by a majority in both the House and Senate when the agency was created in the first place. Public Citizen issued this statement in response: The Fifth Circuit’s dangerously misguided and outrageous decision jeopardizes the most important consumer protection agency created in the last 50 years along with the rules, guidelines, enforcement actions, and consumer education that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has issued and undertaken. The decision ignores long-established and long-accepted practice of funding financial regulatory agencies, and the prior review of many other courts, in order to decree that the funding mechanism of the CFPB is unconstitutional. If upheld, this decision is a gift to scammers and rip-off artists, payday lenders and Big Banks. If it stands, it will go down as one of the most anti-consumer court rulings in history. It must be reversed. [Click now to add your name as a citizen co-signer of our official statement addressing the Fifth Circuit’s absurd ruling.]( Thanks for taking action. For progress, - Robert Weissman, President of Public Citizen *Our judicial system has 11 circuit courts. Each one covers several states. Collectively, they are the next level below the United States Supreme Court, the highest court in the land. Public Citizen | 1600 20th Street NW | Washington DC 20009 | [Unsubscribe](

Marketing emails from citizen.org

View More
Sent On

05/12/2024

Sent On

04/12/2024

Sent On

02/12/2024

Sent On

10/11/2024

Sent On

08/11/2024

Sent On

07/11/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.