Newsletter Subject

deepfakes, democracy, and Taylor Swift

From

citizen.org

Email Address

president@citizen.org

Sent On

Tue, Aug 27, 2024 06:42 PM

Email Preheader Text

We have two days. The Federal Election Commission is meeting this Thursday. And we’re hearing t

We have two days. The Federal Election Commission (FEC) is meeting this Thursday. And we’re hearing that the FEC may reject our formal petition that it take action to prevent political deepfakes from undermining the 2024 election. [This may well be our last chance to stop the FEC from shirking its duty to safeguard our democracy.]( [Please take action right now, even if you’ve taken action before on this critical issue.]( See Lisa’s earlier note — copied below in case you missed it — for more about the threat of political deepfakes. - Robert Weissman, Co-President of Public Citizen ****** Earlier this month, Donald Trump posted deepfakes online that appeared to show pop music superstar Taylor Swift and her fans endorsing him for president. What are “deepfakes”? - Deepfakes are sounds, images, or videos generated using so-called “artificial intelligence” (AI). - This is not science fiction or paranoia. - Existing AI technology is powerful enough to make deepfakes that are essentially indistinguishable from the real thing. - In fact, deepfakes are already being used — nefariously yet effectively — in real-world elections both here in America and elsewhere in the world. To be clear, Taylor Swift has not endorsed Donald Trump. And here’s what I told the national media: “The deepfakes of Taylor Swift are yet another example of AI’s power to create misinformation that deceives and defrauds voters. The potential harms to our society that could result from such misinformation, including abuses of our elections, are wide-reaching and immensely damaging.” In July of 2023, Public Citizen formally petitioned the Federal Election Commission (FEC) to require that political deepfakes be labeled as such. Frankly, it’s the least that the government agency tasked with safeguarding the integrity of our elections should do. But — over a year since we asked the FEC to take this obvious step — we’re hearing that the agency may reject our petition and shirk its duty to prevent deepfakes from undermining the 2024 election. [We are running out of time to make our voices heard before the FEC makes a potentially disastrous mistake. Take action right now, even if you’ve taken action before on this critical issue.]( [To the Federal Election Commission:]( [The FEC’s core responsibility is to safeguard the integrity of our elections. And one of the most serious threats to our democracy is the emergence of political deepfakes. You can still get this right and require that political deepfakes be labeled as such. Democracy itself is hanging in the balance.]( [Click to add your name now.]( Thanks for taking action. For democracy, - Lisa Gilbert, Co-President of Public Citizen [Donate]( | Public Citizen | 215 Pennsylvania Avenue SE | Washington DC 20003 | [Unsubscribe]( [supporter]

Marketing emails from citizen.org

View More
Sent On

05/12/2024

Sent On

04/12/2024

Sent On

02/12/2024

Sent On

10/11/2024

Sent On

08/11/2024

Sent On

07/11/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.