Newsletter Subject

artificial intelligence threatens democracy

From

citizen.org

Email Address

robert@citizen.org

Sent On

Wed, May 8, 2024 06:33 PM

Email Preheader Text

“Policymakers must rush to put in place protections or we’re facing electoral chaos.”

“Policymakers must rush to put in place protections or we’re facing electoral chaos.” That’s what I told The New York Times in a story on deceptive content generated by artificial intelligence (AI) technology — audio, imagery, and video known as “deepfakes” — being used to mislead voters and foment confusion around elections. And here’s what I said on NBC Nightly News: “They are compelling and convincing. They sound real. They look real. So there’s massive possibility for fraud.” AI-generated deepfakes threaten democracy as we know it: - With Big Tech recklessly pumping out ever more powerful AI, we are rapidly getting to the point where everyday Americans, and even experts, won’t be able to distinguish what’s real from what’s fake. - Without clear rules in place in time, AI-generated deepfakes could very well determine the outcome of the 2024 presidential election. - Equally as threatening to a functioning society, an onslaught of deepfakes could make voters feel so confused and powerless that millions essentially give up on our democracy altogether. With Public Citizen leading the way, 15 states have already passed legislation — with bipartisan support — to minimize the chances of deepfakes undermining statewide elections. And we formally petitioned the Federal Election Commission (FEC) — the government agency that is *supposed* to safeguard the fairness and integrity of our elections — to issue clear rules banning the use of deepfakes by national candidates and political parties. But the FEC is dragging its feet, so rules may not be in place in time to prevent AI-generated deepfakes from wreaking havoc throughout the upcoming presidential election. [To the Federal Election Commission:]( [Why is the Federal Election Commission STILL dragging its feet on the threat that political deepfakes pose to the very core of our democracy? The FEC must act without further delay — before it is too late for the 2024 election — and issue clear rules banning the use of AI-generated deepfakes by federal candidates and parties.]( [Click to add your name now.]( Thanks for taking action. For democracy, - Robert Weissman, President of Public Citizen Public Citizen | 1600 20th Street NW | Washington DC 20009 | [Unsubscribe]( [supporter]

Marketing emails from citizen.org

View More
Sent On

24/05/2024

Sent On

23/05/2024

Sent On

22/05/2024

Sent On

21/05/2024

Sent On

20/05/2024

Sent On

19/05/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.